If a smart group of growers of malt barley put together a proposal to the malting company of their choice:
1. Canada Malting Company Ltd with plants in Calgary, Thunder Bay and Montreal.or
2. Rahr Malting located in Alix, Alberta. (My choice because they are solidly prepared to deal one on one with farmers)
3. Prairie Malt Limited in Biggar Sask., or
4. ADM Malting located in Winnipeg.
(These companies, together, are the largest customers of the CWB buying approximately 1.1 million tonnes/yr.
These growers, if they are smart, will negotiate a tentative contract with the malting companies, dedicating SPRING ACRES to malting barley.
Rahr already has created a grower's contract and they have shown positive initiative in dealing with farmers.
The contracts would be conditional upon the CWB NOT being involed in any of the deal. No buyback. No fees. No deals.
Feed companies, with the blessing of the CWB, in the past, successfully negotiated the Export Manufactures Feed Agreement, bypassing CWB marketing and pooling, with Licensing cost downloaded onto the pooling accounts.
Directors like McCreary and Oberg obviously must love to pay for corporations' licensing costs, because if they did not, they would make sure the Federal Governemtnt pays for them, as the Feds are legislatively responsible to do so.
If the malt copmpanies and malting barley farmers cannot negotiate an Export Malting Barley Agreement with the CWB, the farmer can rip up the tentative contract and sow a different crop or grow feed barley.
The only dispensible entity is the CWB.
Parsley
1. Canada Malting Company Ltd with plants in Calgary, Thunder Bay and Montreal.or
2. Rahr Malting located in Alix, Alberta. (My choice because they are solidly prepared to deal one on one with farmers)
3. Prairie Malt Limited in Biggar Sask., or
4. ADM Malting located in Winnipeg.
(These companies, together, are the largest customers of the CWB buying approximately 1.1 million tonnes/yr.
These growers, if they are smart, will negotiate a tentative contract with the malting companies, dedicating SPRING ACRES to malting barley.
Rahr already has created a grower's contract and they have shown positive initiative in dealing with farmers.
The contracts would be conditional upon the CWB NOT being involed in any of the deal. No buyback. No fees. No deals.
Feed companies, with the blessing of the CWB, in the past, successfully negotiated the Export Manufactures Feed Agreement, bypassing CWB marketing and pooling, with Licensing cost downloaded onto the pooling accounts.
Directors like McCreary and Oberg obviously must love to pay for corporations' licensing costs, because if they did not, they would make sure the Federal Governemtnt pays for them, as the Feds are legislatively responsible to do so.
If the malt copmpanies and malting barley farmers cannot negotiate an Export Malting Barley Agreement with the CWB, the farmer can rip up the tentative contract and sow a different crop or grow feed barley.
The only dispensible entity is the CWB.
Parsley
Comment