I'll quote silverback to respond to your request revisiting your first posting. He was brillaint in his choice of questions:
silverback posted Jan 16, 2008 9:15
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That was very mature J.
Going back to your first post here, the only thing I can take from it is that you feel that having higher prices is a bad thing. Is that correct?
Or are you saying that it would be better if prices are to rise that they only rise a little bit? Who will decide the proper level of price increase?
I am not sure you are watching at the moment since you are not a producing farmer, but the world price for wheat and barley is way higher than what our forced pooling masters think we should receive. I guess this fact makes you happy?
Do you believe that a farmer in ND that is going to be able to sell his wheat at the highest price in generations is doomed to be blasted out of existence because he captured those high prices?
Do you think it is better to have long term debt sitting on the books and not getting paid off in a really good year?
I also don't understand how you can argue that asking small, poorer countries to actually pay the world price for grain is a bad thing? Funny how they are managing to pay for it right now. Do you favor asking different prices in different countries for the same wheat? Who actually gets to decide if that is good policy for the farmers who produced it? If we sold wheat to China and India 15 years ago at less than market value was that smart? They seem to be doing pretty good right now, maybe they will pay more than market value this year if we ask nicely.
UNQUOTE
My not-so-nuancity is really saying nobody would make the statement you did, with a straight face, unless you don't beleive in the free market system.
Here's a tried and true formula:
Two-by-four whack ducking cross-dressers' defense of statements hit and yawn = single desk mentality
Yup.
Parsley
ps Thanks silverback. You are eloquent.
silverback posted Jan 16, 2008 9:15
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That was very mature J.
Going back to your first post here, the only thing I can take from it is that you feel that having higher prices is a bad thing. Is that correct?
Or are you saying that it would be better if prices are to rise that they only rise a little bit? Who will decide the proper level of price increase?
I am not sure you are watching at the moment since you are not a producing farmer, but the world price for wheat and barley is way higher than what our forced pooling masters think we should receive. I guess this fact makes you happy?
Do you believe that a farmer in ND that is going to be able to sell his wheat at the highest price in generations is doomed to be blasted out of existence because he captured those high prices?
Do you think it is better to have long term debt sitting on the books and not getting paid off in a really good year?
I also don't understand how you can argue that asking small, poorer countries to actually pay the world price for grain is a bad thing? Funny how they are managing to pay for it right now. Do you favor asking different prices in different countries for the same wheat? Who actually gets to decide if that is good policy for the farmers who produced it? If we sold wheat to China and India 15 years ago at less than market value was that smart? They seem to be doing pretty good right now, maybe they will pay more than market value this year if we ask nicely.
UNQUOTE
My not-so-nuancity is really saying nobody would make the statement you did, with a straight face, unless you don't beleive in the free market system.
Here's a tried and true formula:
Two-by-four whack ducking cross-dressers' defense of statements hit and yawn = single desk mentality
Yup.
Parsley
ps Thanks silverback. You are eloquent.
Comment