Pecuniary Benefit...What the hell is it?

[wilagro]

Why all of this squawking? Someone pull your tail feathers?

[parsley]

14(b)is the regulation pursuant to section 46(d) of the Act.

46(d) of the Act and 14(b)regulation work hand in hand.

I figured I'd post the regulation. workhorse.

Parsley

[parsley]

Wilagrow, you need to read the story about little red hens.

They dislike turkeys.

[parsley]

What does the dictionary say?
Can't say I made it up!

pecuniary

adj
1. Consisting of or relating to money; monetary

2.Having a monetary penalty; entailing a fine.


So we know it's going to cost us!

[parsley]

And what did the legislators consider it to be?

Did they feel it was a fine?


CABINET documents tell us exactly what the Cabinet wanted the pecuniary benefit to represent:

They said it

"..merely provides a device exactly corresponding to the operation of the protective tariff.."


Ah...so the CWB's intended pecuniary benefit is described as a NATIONAL TARIFF.


We cannot argue with the originators of the bill, can we? They knew what they meant!


If you are tired of being plucked by single deskers, read on.

[parsley]

So now we know the pecuniary benefit is a NATIONAL TARIFF tariff that has to be paid to the Wheaat Board.



(b) the applicant pays to the Corporation a sum of money that, in the opinion of the Corporation, represents the pecuniary benefit
enuring to the applicant pursuant to the granting of the licence


enuring to the applicant......


Dictionary says inure means
To have or take effect; to be applied
Also spelled enure


SO the pecuniary benefit/tariff is to be applied to the applicant... Yup.

northfarmer can be the applicant, for example. And he pays the tariff to the Wheat Board as soon as he gets the license.


Now, one question you should ask is this.....When it comes to national tariffs, which collect monies from all across the nation,where is that money SUPPOSED to sent? The CWB collects it, but where is it supposed to end up?

Think about the gun registry money. Should a collection agency keep it?Should only Labrador stash the cash?

National Tariffs for automobiles?
National Tariffs for lumber?
National Tariffs for machinery?
Where should it be deposited?

Legally, that is.....?

It is supposed to go to the Revenue consolidated fund. Federal tarrifs must be forwarded to the Federal Government by the Collection agency.

Uh huh.

Anybody see something the matter with this picture?

Guess who forgot to remit the tariffs?

Yup.

I am no longer allowed to say names.

Shhhh.

But we, know, don't we. Yup. We know.

Parsley

[parsley]

makar,
I had to re-write this for you, and it has been revised to accomodate the faint of heart.


Slavery in the village can stop when we take the time to read the fine print.

The CWB decided NOT to bite a hunk of cash out of .......whom?

Well lookie, lookie

1. All seed growers. They apply to the CWB, and are automatically given a license that remains in effect. NO pecuniary benefit is collected from them! They pass go and pocket the "pecuniary benefit". Hmmm.

2. Any farmer in Canada outside the Designated Area, DO NOT PAY A PECUNIARY BENEFIT into the pooling accounts.

Every Eastern farmer banks that PB they don't pay. No wonder a certain MP squawks. Can you imagine what Ontario and Quebec farmers would tell the Wheat Board if Easterners were told a big tall tale about capturing a "peculiarly benefit " from them?

3. Feed mills in Canada buying millions and millions of bushels of feed wheat and barley do not pay one red cent of pecuniary benefit to the CWB pooling acc****s.

Just naming a few, so you get the point.

So tell me this, Agri-villers:

Citizen X from the Wheat Boaard told this to Allan Dawson and I'm quoting it from a public newspaper:


"...the act also compels the CWB to capture the pecuniary benefit..."


Does "X" mean the CWB breaks the law when they don't capture the benefit from Eastern farmers?


Does that mena the CWB breaks the law when they don't capture the benefit
from feed mills?

Does that mean the CWB breaks the law when they don't capture the benefit from seed growers?


And then, the CWB's " Representative X" states in a public newspaper:

"The act is pretty clear in that regard."



hmmmm..


hmmm.

Either it's a falsehood,
or else

the CWB is breaking the law,

or else
Allan Dawson's reporting is false/incorrect.

Which is it?

Parsley


PS

I find Allan Dawson measured in his words he quotes, and I like him, although I do not regularly agree with him. LOL

[agstar77]

Please read joedale's post, particularily the parts about monopolizing discussion and personal attacks.

[parsley]

(b) the applicant pays to the Corporation a sum of money that, in the opinion of the Corporation, represents the pecuniary benefit enuring to the applicant pursuant to the granting of the licence, arising solely by reason of the prohibition of the export of that grain or those products without a licence,


soley means ONLY ONE reason

So on what can the CWB slap the tariff on you and you have to pay? Your seed barley? The oat chop you feed to your cows? What about flax? Or beans? What about if you have the license, do you still pay the tariff?

NOPE
Look again...


"arising solely by reason of the prohibition of the export of that grain or those products without a licence,"


It says above, you pay a pecuniary benefit/national tariff for ONLY ONLY:

1 Wheat or barley/their products.(they could add soybeans and take out barley!) being exported without a license.

2. In other words, if you have a license, you don't pay a tariff.

3. A feed mill gets a license, and skips away without paying a tariff.


4. Don't you ever wonder who gets licenses,er... quietly. No tariff. $0.00 lotta cash saved that way.


Parsley

Wait...there is more

[parsley]

This isn't monopolization of discussion, agstar.

This is a litany of discussional literature.

I would like to politely suggest that you move to a less offensive thread and I got that idea from CWB staff who repeatedly told farmers in the Designated Area to move to the United States if they don't like the Canadian Wheat Board.

My suggestion is made respectfully, of course.

Parsley