• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Reasons Why should CWB Directors Should Provide DA Farmers With Marketing Choice

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Unless they are truly dull of mind.

    Yup!

    these guys don't even know their light bulbs are burnt out (ya know, the ones that go off when they get an inspiring idea)

    Comment


      #22
      You are far too persuasive, AdamSmith.

      Comment


        #23
        Lets not forget the CWB Directors and bureaucracy are not in charge. The Act is full of "the Governor in Council may make regulations..." A few examples cut and pasted:

        "Duty to comply
        3.12 (2) The directors and officers of the Corporation shall comply with this Act, the regulations, the by-laws of the Corporation and any directions given to the Corporation under this Act.
        6. (1) The Corporation possesses the following powers:
        (j) to act as agent for or on behalf of any minister or agent of Her Majesty in right of Canada in respect of any operations that it may be directed to carry out by the Governor in Council;
        Directions to the Corporation
        18. (1) The Governor in Council may, by order, direct the Corporation with respect to the manner in which any of its operations, powers and duties under this Act shall be conducted, exercised or performed.
        Directors (1.1) The directors shall cause the directions to be implemented and, in so far as they act in accordance with section 3.12, they are not accountable for any consequences arising from the implementation of the directions.
        Best interests (1.2) Compliance by the Corporation with directions is deemed to be in the best interests of the Corporation."

        As long as the G.in C. doesn't give orders contravening or beyond the Act, the orders must be followed.

        Why would we try to convince leftie directors, Bloque lefties and liberal senators if Minister Ritz can give us what we need?

        Comment


          #24
          Raven,

          I think the Canadian Wheat Board Act is an abomination.

          For example, feed mills and elevators are treated like they have been confiscated for Canadians. Good grief. I don't want that kind of anit-democratic control to continue, and regulatory changes can weaken and not destroy. My choice would be to delete the CWB into Trash.

          Why should wheat and barley shipments be licensed? Canola and flax are not.

          Why should the CWB have so much legislated control over the railroads?

          The CWB Act functions as a national licensing body, but it does it in a discriminatory fashion. So what is the point of continuing with national licnesing duties?

          The CWB functions as though it is a mutant, crippled by sections not in force, ignoring the Act that is supposed to rule it, disdaining the people it is supposed to serve, afflicted with cronyism.

          Haughty, self-serving, secretive, and hopelessly indifferent, their percieived incessant fighting with and percieived deceptive practices to the farm community has destroyed whatever they might have been,.

          I really don't sanction its' survival, but I would tolerate Directors' licensing approval until it is put to sleep as is the fate of all slightly rabid dogs.

          Parsley

          Comment


            #25
            Parsley,

            I posted your email so hope I am not in trouble.

            Comment


              #26
              The cwb have to provide it because they are not above the gov't. Like agriweek said a months ago - what would happen if the army decided to do anything they pleased.
              Until the pro cwb crowd decides to start paying my input bills - quit stealing my money by this communistic pooling.

              Comment


                #27
                Parsley, While I appreciate option #5 to some degree I would never be an advocate for breaking the law. Thanks anyway.hehe
                I will have to agree with you that an immediate change of policy regarding no-charge license (option #4) with forthcoming changes via parliament abolishing the act completely (option #2).

                Comment


                  #28
                  1. Raven: Fine, but I'd appreciate it if you don't post it on your website.

                  2. bucket:

                  "The cwb have to provide it because they are not above the gov't."

                  I agree. However, the single-desk Directors have ignored their own Act for so long, they actually think they are above the law. Irresponsible.

                  Maybe a class action against the Single-Desk Directors is appropriate.

                  If the Choice directors are smart, they will ask for a recorded vote.

                  3. Jay-mo: Ghandi broke the law. If he hadn't, Indians woould still be paying a tariff to the British in order to get salt from the ocean in their own bloody country.

                  Parsley

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Please let me know how to participate in a class action suit. I would be very interested in that.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      I've often thought the same, Parsley.
                      >>
                      If the Choice directors are smart, they will ask for a recorded vote.<<

                      But, what does it matter? The board minutes are not public, I've asked numerous times. Maybe in a court of law, tho.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...