Dyno, your excessive personal attact aimed at others within this website deserves comment.
My first reaction to posting was;
"Wow is this guy ever sensitive"
The kind of sharpe attack you presented was very much indicitive of someone who; 1. is intolerent to points of view that differ from their own. 2. is not accustomed to thinking broadly beyond what would be considered the norm. 3. appears to have a greater personel stake in the matter at hand than they are letting on. (Not the Ken Dillion incident but the CWB in general)
As someone who is naturally inquisitive and get's annoyed and frustrated at not knowing the answers to questions, I ask more questions, make inquires, anylize various possabilities and try to find out the answers. This ranges from why my kid's are constantly at each others throats?, to, are there any benifits to duals on my combine? and why does sclerotina show up in one field and not the other?
It also extends into why does the CWB say they get me a premium for my wheat and barley when the evidence (the cheques I've put in the bank)would suggest otherwise?
Why does the CWB not take into consideration the extra costs associated with the single desk when calculating out the value of the single desk system?
What is so important and so valuable about a system where it take millions of dollars per year to defend it from foreign and domestic challenges alike?
Why is the government so protective of a system that has divided the farmers, made friends into enemies and where farmers from both sides of this issue claim to have been threatened?
Why won't the minister and the board of directors answers director Jim Chateney's questions?
This natural inquisitivness that also extends to;
Why is Ken Dillon in a comma in Regina?
Which leads to many other questions with no clear answers immidiatly available,
does not warrent the label of conspiricy theorists.
What it does suggest though is that there are alot of people who will demand more than dismisive comments from the investigators of this incident.
My first reaction to posting was;
"Wow is this guy ever sensitive"
The kind of sharpe attack you presented was very much indicitive of someone who; 1. is intolerent to points of view that differ from their own. 2. is not accustomed to thinking broadly beyond what would be considered the norm. 3. appears to have a greater personel stake in the matter at hand than they are letting on. (Not the Ken Dillion incident but the CWB in general)
As someone who is naturally inquisitive and get's annoyed and frustrated at not knowing the answers to questions, I ask more questions, make inquires, anylize various possabilities and try to find out the answers. This ranges from why my kid's are constantly at each others throats?, to, are there any benifits to duals on my combine? and why does sclerotina show up in one field and not the other?
It also extends into why does the CWB say they get me a premium for my wheat and barley when the evidence (the cheques I've put in the bank)would suggest otherwise?
Why does the CWB not take into consideration the extra costs associated with the single desk when calculating out the value of the single desk system?
What is so important and so valuable about a system where it take millions of dollars per year to defend it from foreign and domestic challenges alike?
Why is the government so protective of a system that has divided the farmers, made friends into enemies and where farmers from both sides of this issue claim to have been threatened?
Why won't the minister and the board of directors answers director Jim Chateney's questions?
This natural inquisitivness that also extends to;
Why is Ken Dillon in a comma in Regina?
Which leads to many other questions with no clear answers immidiatly available,
does not warrent the label of conspiricy theorists.
What it does suggest though is that there are alot of people who will demand more than dismisive comments from the investigators of this incident.
Comment