• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Update on the Mississippi River.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Update on the Mississippi River.

    Published: Dec 28, 2012
    The latest U.S. Army Corps of Engineers forecast for Mississippi River water levels near Thebes, Ill., could mean that traffic will come to a halt as early as Jan. 3, according to the Waterways Council, Inc.

    Though previous forecasts suggested that the congressionally authorized nine-foot navigation channel could remain in operation until perhaps the middle of January, the latest forecast calls for the Mississippi River gauge at Thebes to be at 3 feet and falling on or around January 3-4, with vessel drafts limited to 8 feet, WCI says.

    The forecast for the river gauge to reach to 2 feet and falling will be on or around January 12-13, allowing only a 7-foot maximum vessel draft. It is estimated that the river will reach a reading of 1 foot and falling on or around January 19, which equates to 6 feet of navigable depth.




    Work has begun on rock pinnacle removal near Thebes, Ill., but some caution that rock removal isn't enough to keep river commerce moving.
    WCI notes that a majority of towboats require a 9-foot draft to operate and only a very small number of towing vessels can operate at 8- or 7-foot drafts.

    WCI and other stakeholders continue to urge the Administration to release a minimal amount of water from the Missouri River reservoirs (4,000 cfs or 1% of current storage in the reservoir system) to avert this effective shutdown of the Mississippi River to barge transportation.

    While the Corps and the Coast Guard have said that they have no plans to close the river, WCI says this latest forecast and falling water levels will preclude navigation because towboats will be unable to transit the "bottleneck reach" between St. Louis, Mo., and Cairo, Ill.

    "The Corps' rock pinnacle removal and dredging work and our collective prayers for rain have not produced enough water to sustain navigation on the Mississippi River and so the Administration must act to avert a closure," said Michael J. Toohey, WCI president and CEO. "We have been urging action all along and the time is now to release needed water or we will have run out of time on this national crisis," he continued.

    Tom Allegretti, American Waterways Operators president and CEO, stressed the effects closure would have on industry.

    "The nation's shippers, farmers, manufacturers and operators have been feeling the impacts of this emergency, with cancelled orders, lost exports to market, and higher prices to consumers, but unless water is provided now to avert a shutdown, those impacts will increase significantly," Allegretti noted.

    "Unless the Administration takes action now, the nation risks 60 days or more without waterborne commerce on the mid-Mississippi River. We urge the White House to authorize the release of additional water immediately to maintain navigation on our country's busiest and most important waterway," Allegretti said.

    WCI says the potential supply-chain disruption could affect nearly 20,000 jobs and $130 million in wages in Mississippi River states as well as $7 billion in commodities in December and January alone, including more than 7 million tons of agricultural products worth $2.3 billion and 1.7 million tons of chemical products worth $1.8 billion.

    "Thousands of the nation's farmers, shippers, manufacturers and towboat operators urge action from President Obama to direct the Corps to release a small amount of water from Missouri River reservoirs over a short period of time to keep businesses open, exports and cargo moving, and Americans employed," Toohey and Allegretti concluded.

    #2
    looks like more water storage would be a great idea. Both in the US and Canada.

    Without water... we all fail. We need to save all the water we can... for the times of shortage.

    Cheers!

    Comment


      #3
      Canada has been blocking the drainage of Devils Lake into the Red River system due to foreign species getting into the Lake Winnipeg Commercial fishing

      I have heard that it would actually be easier to send it to the Missouri, and eventually to the Mississippi system...... Why not do this to provide some more water? Short term gain, and maybe recover some ND farmland?

      Comment


        #4
        Tom

        You are right, Canada should be damning the north and south saskatchewan rivers at every point it becomes a trickle.

        Why they wait is beyond reason. It doesn't get cheaper or easier to do unless they are waiting for the tree huggers to ok it.

        Comment


          #5
          There has been a proposal around since the
          1920's to dam the South Saskatchewan near the
          point where it crosses the Alberta Saskatchewan
          boarder. The Meridian dam project. It gathers dust
          and then every 30 years or so governments study
          it, reject the idea, then it gathers dust again. Last
          time it was studied was around 2002.
          Environmental lobbyists came from all over to
          fight the proposal. Those same lobbyists received
          funding from all over the world to fight the project.
          As a result the proposal is gathering dust again. I
          agree, we should be saving water but don't
          believe it will happen in my lifetime.

          Comment


            #6
            Sad, isn't it. That people can't understand the value.

            If Lake diefenbaker wasn't here, neither would saskatchewan.

            60 percent of the people living in Saskatchewan rely on that body of water!

            The truth is once the meridan dam was full normal flows would return downstream but maybe a little less drastic water level fluctuations. Plus you would have another reservoir and maybe another hydro electric plant.

            There is no reason why we are not cascading the water from the rocky mountains and generating 5 times the power from the same water.

            As I have said there is no vision from the politicians in this province. Period.

            Thank god diefenbaker, douglas and gardner and others had the vision to do what they did, when they did, because that lake wouldn't be built today with the current leaders.

            Comment


              #7
              Supposedly Harper is naming 4 Things after Old Man John Diefenbaker. Also hearing The Goverment gunna Divest all of its Irrigation Assests in Sascratch&win. Anyone take a guess on how much it gunna go for in $$$$$$'s?????????

              Comment


                #8
                A strategic water control policy would establish more small water catchment areas with small resevoirs to prevent flooding and allow for better water use. Grandiose water projects like the Red River diversion look good but are not the best solution.

                Comment


                  #9
                  BTO

                  My guess would be nickels on the dollar.

                  The riverhurst irrigation district has made millionaires and now they will sell the infrastructure to them for nothing. And then when they can't afford to replace a pump they will go to the government for funding.

                  Its really quite sickening. The highest subsidized farmers in western canada live within 20 minutes of me and they need help to purchase infrastucture, yet they can afford million dollar harvesting and seeding equipment.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Damming the Saskatchewan Rivers won't help the situation on the Mississippi. However you are all right, The structures that have been build on the prairies have done a huge amount of benefits to the Prairies. Hydro, irrigation, municipal uses, flood control, etc etc. Those tree huggers need to get a life and see the benefits beyond the flooding of a few acres of land, some "heritage sites" and the cost to relocate a few roads etc.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Missouririvermap.jpg

                      Heres a picture of the Missouri system. Except for a few miles of the Milk River, in Southern Alberta, all the water in Missouri comes from the USA. According to Wiki, I didn't realize its the longest river in the USA.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Remember Devine intervention and Rafferty-
                        Alameda? That project met with a lot of
                        opposition. Now we are benefitting because of
                        his persistence.

                        Comment

                        • Reply to this Thread
                        • Return to Topic List
                        Working...