• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cranston grain, Trevor Schulz, screws farmers

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    There isn't much you can do after the
    fact. This was a 30k deal for me,
    seemingly not a large amount, won't go
    broke. Just have to watch every amount
    going forward, even a load. Others had
    less, others had much more hurt.

    Cranston Grain was told by the CGC that
    he did not need to be bonded. Had a
    strong reputation for seven years, no
    BBB complaints, always paid the bills.
    Everything in the right place.

    The worst is guys who had cheques
    deferred. That sucks as they found out
    Dec 24th. Nice Xmas present, not!

    We need paypal (or something like it)
    for grain. Given the price of grain
    today even a load of barley is a good
    chunk of money.

    Comment


      #12
      They absolutely were payed by feedlots
      etc. He took the money.

      Comment


        #13
        Sounds like fraud then. Even if they try to bank,
        hide, bury or run.

        Comment


          #14
          Holy shit, I should proof read my
          posts.... didn't make sense, said the
          same thing. The 30 grand would go a long
          way in making a yearly payment on one of
          my major pieces of equipment, to me it is
          substantial.

          Comment


            #15
            WD9,

            Shelly at Market Master LTD was telling us about a
            'Producer Security Program' PSP that is just being put
            in place under the revisions to the CG Act.

            1. It will be 90 percent coverage;

            2. Cost will be about .005 percent ($50/10,000)

            3. An approved list of buyers are being screened as we
            speak... which Market Master will be an Agent for
            selling to, so you can buy the insurance from Market
            Master... and the Insurance Co's will have a policy you
            WD9 will buy from Market Master. I understand your
            name will be on the face of the contract... and the
            grain buyer being the insured... Market Master being
            the Agent selling the PSP somewhat like buying hail
            insurance from a local rep.

            4. If the normal 3 weeks or so go buy.. and payment is
            not forthcoming... after refusal to pay... then the
            insurance Co's like EDC go after the grain buyer.... if
            still no payment... then 90 percent is paid by the PSP
            to WD9.

            5. About 6 big insurers like EDC will be backing the
            PSP program... which means it is secure.

            6. Each load can be insured individually.

            7. Proper paper work will be required... for the PSP to
            be in effect.

            I truly hope this will help growers to assess risk and be
            secure.

            We learn through the school of hard knocks... we took
            our medicine on our farm... as well. I look forward to
            this innovative change the new CG Act will provide.

            Cheers

            Comment


              #16
              Accounts Receivable Insurance equals
              downloading moral responsibility on
              others. I have a problem with it. When
              some of these companies sense they are
              going to have trouble meeting their
              accounts payable, why do they continue to
              do business?

              Comment


                #17
                Naive at my age, TSK TSK!!

                Comment


                  #18
                  Here we go again , more offloading of costs. The Harper master plan at work.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Why should it not be the responsibility of a licensed grain dealer to have adequate bonding? Am I crazy or does anyone else see the problem with the cgc system?

                    Comment


                      #20
                      As indicated by TOM4CWB, the new Canada Grain Act
                      will replace current bonding requirements with an
                      insurance program with premiums paid for by the
                      buyer side. Likely will only apply to licensed
                      elevators/dealers as defined by the Act. There is
                      some talk of extending this insurance programs to
                      non-licensed grain buyers.

                      The Canada Grains Act was included with the bigger
                      Bill. Final details are being worked out so still time to
                      influence decisions. Won't help in this case but there
                      are things that could be done to improve payment
                      security.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...