• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cranston grain, Trevor Schulz, screws farmers

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Farmaholic,

    The cost of producer security is ALREADY in the basis
    now today... for Licensed and Bonded
    dealers/elevators under the Canada Grain Act. My
    understanding is the new insurance producer security
    program is an alternative to the CGC system... for
    growers to use with security approved (by the six
    insurance co's) who approve grain buyers... that are
    not Licensed under the CG Act.

    Will be great to see the program roll out in the next
    few weeks I am told.

    Comment


      #32
      It better not be a financial advantage for large
      companies over the smaller ones. If that was to
      happen there would be even less price discovery,
      and few delivery options in the future. Don't give
      the big guys the opportunity to buy the market, or
      they will, seems to be major consolidation
      already, future options will be limited. Won't
      matter what competition bureau thinks.

      Comment


        #33
        I am more than happy to do my own diligence for
        my own farm/business. I will pay the cost. It's a
        minuscule amount compared to pissing tens of
        thousands of dollars into the wind.
        A working man/ woman gets up in the morning,
        and goes to work every weekday for six months to
        earn $30,000.
        Farmers won't even pick up a phone, or click a
        mouse 4 times to look after their own sales, and
        then complain on a public forum that the
        responsibility, and cost for their due dilligence
        belongs to somebody else.
        Are you guys for real?
        I think I am in an episode of Seinfeld.

        Comment


          #34
          Tom4,
          The insurance program works excellent. Accounts
          recievable insurance has been available in the
          business world for decades. I started with it in
          2006. One bad credit check ( no sale) and no
          defaults. I have done over 2 million dollars in
          value of sales.. This is why I have been
          encouraging it on AV since October. The insurers
          participating in the program you describe also
          cover export sales for line companies and the
          cwb. Ironically, farmers have difficulty seeing
          value in it!

          Comment


            #35
            You guys should check out cleargrain.com.au
            Basically eBay for grain with payment security

            Tom4cwb know how it works and is skilled up on
            it

            Comment


              #36
              Hobbyfarmer, for sure there are avenues
              to protect yourself. We are not as dumb
              and lazy as you suggest, however my
              point is where do you start drawing the
              line?

              At 10k? 30K? All loads? For me its
              simple going forward, i'm gonna get
              paid. Its gonna cost a little bit and
              that's ok.

              But calling me a loser and lazy isn't
              very nice. The lesson for me has been
              nobody knows the financial state of
              anyone anymore. No one can be trusted.
              Regardless of contract size, and who it
              is, be protected.

              Here's an interesting question. How many
              of you actually have signed contracts
              every time by both parties? Often its a
              phone call and confirmation. Will
              insurance cover unsigned contracts?
              Nope. Can you confidently go to court
              without one, nope. More tough lessons.

              Comment


                #37
                "Cranston Grain was told by the CGC that he did not need to be bonded."

                This is illogical if the company was buying farm grain. Is this fact or coffee shop talk?

                Comment


                  #38
                  My thoughts exactly Larry. That
                  statement make absolutely no sense.
                  Maybe that is coffee shop talk or maybe
                  that's a statement Cranston Grain is
                  using as a excuse. Either way, it's not
                  true. My best guess would be that
                  Cranston decided not to get bonded by
                  the CGC because of the cost associated
                  with getting the bond level that the
                  needed. The CGC has never, nor will they
                  ever tell a buyer who is buying grain
                  from a Canadian farmer that they don't
                  need to be bonded.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Motto of new grain insurance company.
                    "When a claim is received, deny, deny,
                    deny, framers are sooo stupid they'll just
                    walk away, mumbling bout it." Nother way
                    ta screw framers, angribusiness at its
                    best!

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Unfortunately,I got to meet Trevor when
                      this first surfaced. I'm sure there are
                      more sides to the story, but this was
                      his side:
                      He purchased/contracted, then resold a
                      bunch of grain from farmers before the
                      run up in prices. Fall came, the price
                      went up, and many of the farmers refused
                      to deliver at the lower prices, so he
                      had to buy grain at higher market values
                      to fill his obligations. Combined with
                      being late in getting paid by some of
                      his clients, everything snowballed from
                      there. I also understand that he was on
                      the wrong side of the Newco default as
                      well. Not justifying what happened,
                      just filling in what I know, and as I
                      say, only one side of the story.
                      However, there were many lies about what
                      was going on. I will say it looks like
                      a lot of assets in a fancy home and
                      vehicles, but there could be no equity
                      in either. After asking around, almost
                      none of the brokers around here are
                      bonded, my new policy is selling one
                      load at a time if the broker isn't
                      bonded, I can't afford a hit like wd9
                      had.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...