• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ethanol replaces $47.2B (465M Barrels of imported oil)!

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Ethanol replaces $47.2B (465M Barrels of imported oil)!

    RFA Report Finds Despite Challenges, Ethanol Industry
    Creates Over 380,000 Jobs and $43 Billion in GDP in
    2012
    Date Posted: February 6, 2013

    Las Vegas—In a challenging year for America’s farm
    economy, domestic ethanol production reached an
    estimated 13.3 billion gallons — the second highest
    annual production level in history amidst the nation’s
    worst drought in 50 years.

    According to analysis conducted by Cardno-ENTRIX
    and commissioned by the Renewable Fuels Association
    (RFA), the production of the estimated 13.3 billion
    gallons of ethanol directly employed 87,292
    Americans.

    An additional 295,969 Americans found work in
    positions indirectly affiliated with or induced by
    ethanol production.

    These 383,260 total jobs helped create $30.2 billion in
    household income and contributed $43.4 billion to the
    national Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

    Last year’s second highest annual ethanol production
    also helped displace 465 million barrels of imported
    oil worth $47.2 billion.

    “This past year, our nation’s ethanol industry has
    demonstrated its efficiency and resilience during one
    of the worst droughts in half a century.

    "Despite the weather and declining gasoline
    consumption, our domestic, homegrown industry kept
    up production, continued to improve the environment,
    and helped reduce our dependence on foreign oil,”
    said RFA President and CEO Bob Dinneen.

    The report, entitled “CONTRIBUTION OF THE ETHANOL
    INDUSTRY TO THE ECONOMY OF THE UNITED STATES,”
    was completed by CARDNO Entrix and can be
    downloaded here.

    Key finding of the report include:

    • 87,292 direct jobs

    • 295,969 indirect and induced jobs

    • $43.4 billion contribution to GDP

    • $30.2 billion in household income

    • 465 million barrels of imported oil displaced, valued
    at $47.2 billion in 2012.

    • $7.9 billion paid in federal, state and local taxes
    helping support local roads, schools, first responders."

    http://www.biofuelsjournal.com/info/bf_articles.html?
    ID=130174

    #2
    RFA to UN: Biofuels Benefit Developing Economies and
    Global Food Security
    Date Posted: February 5, 2013

    Washington—The Renewable Fuels Association (RFA)
    submitted comments condemning a U.N. Committee
    on World Food Security (CFS) draft study on biofuels
    and food security.

    The U.N. CFS appointed a “high level panel of experts”
    to conduct the study.

    Timothy Searchinger, an outspoken critic of biofuels
    and author of a highly controversial 2008 report on
    indirect land use change, is among the appointed
    panelists.

    Geoff Cooper, RFA’s Vice President for Research and
    Analysis, explained that the draft report “needs
    substantial revision before it can be submitted for
    official peer review.

    "Not only does the report fail to discuss potentially
    positive impacts of biofuels expansion on food
    security, but it also inappropriately expands the
    intended scope of the study, blatantly disregards input
    from the May 2012 consultation, fails to include a
    comprehensive literature review, and adopts highly
    questionable assumptions regarding animal feed co-
    products, crop yields and other factors.”

    The RFA comments reflect the association’s belief that
    “biofuels are providing tangible benefits and positive
    outcomes for both the world’s farmers and consumers.

    "Biofuels have already proven themselves as agents of
    economic development, environmental improvement,
    and social progress in many developed nations.

    "We believe biofuels can bring the same benefits to
    developing nations without jeopardizing food security.

    "In fact, biofuels have the potential to serve as an
    important tool in reducing food insecurity.

    "Indeed, we agree with the U.N. Food & Agriculture
    Organization (FAO) that: ‘…investment in bioenergy
    could spark much-needed investment in agricultural
    and transport infrastructure in rural areas and, by
    creating jobs and boosting household incomes, could
    alleviate poverty and food [in]security.’”

    The RFA comments can be read in full here.

    http://www.biofuelsjournal.com/info/bf_articles.html?
    ID=130128

    Comment


      #3
      ACE: Big Oil and Others Continue Misguided Attacks on
      U.S. Ethanol
      Date Posted: February 5, 2013

      Sioux Falls, SD—The Executive Vice President for the
      American Coalition for Ethanol, Brian Jennings released
      the following statement Feb. 4 in response to groups
      led by Big Oil calling for an end to the Renewable Fuel
      Standard (RFS).

      Following last night’s heart-warming Super Bowl ad by
      Dodge, reminding the world who farmers really are, I
      was hopeful that more people would realize how
      important these providers of fuel are to our nation.

      Leave it to Big Oil, Big Food and their partners in
      misinformation to hold the latest Cheap Corn Coalition
      press even a day later.

      The RFS is working.

      It is the most effective policy ever enacted by Congress
      to reduce foreign oil imports.

      When the RFS went into effect in 2006, U.S. oil imports
      stood at 60 percent. In 2012, net oil imports fell to
      less than 40 percent.

      Further, unlike oil, ethanol is not subsidized and
      wholesale prices of ethanol are still 40 to 50 cents per
      gallon less expensive than unleaded gasoline.

      Consumers would pay more at the pump if the RFS is
      repealed, and the U.S. would return to relying on the
      rest of the world for more expensive forms of fossil
      fuel.

      Big Oil built the “blend wall,” by refusing to take any
      steps toward meeting the RFS while they instead spent
      millions of dollars on lawsuits and PR efforts like the
      one they staged again today.

      Even reporters ask if there is anything new in their
      message.

      There isn't - because big oil continues to spend its
      considerable financial and political capital to block the
      use of ethanol in gasoline.

      The RFS was enacted in-part to help break through the
      blend wall by enabling consumers to have access to
      more affordable and cleaner choices at the pump.

      There also continues to be considerable rhetoric and
      time spent discussing E15 and small engines.

      It is illegal for small engines to use E15. EPA approved
      E15 for the majority of motor vehicles on the road
      today but did not approve the fuel for non-road
      engines in part because these engines are not
      advanced enough to take advantage of ethanol-blends.

      Small engine owners, including marine equipment
      owners, should not use E15.

      Finally, corn production has expanded and become
      more efficient since enactment of the RFS.

      Even with last year’s drought, global grain production
      still reached one of the largest production totals ever,
      and ethanol is slated to use about three percent of that
      total on a gross basis, returning one-third of the corn
      we process to livestock producers as a valuable feed.

      While these ethanol opponents continue to cast
      themselves as being concerned about all sorts of
      different issues, they simply want to eliminate
      competition for their products.

      The Cheap Corn Coalition lives to spread even more
      misinformation.

      http://www.biofuelsjournal.com/info/bf_articles.html?
      ID=130105

      Comment


        #4
        Sooo... It is clear ethanol DOES NOT cause more fuel to
        be burned than the energy it creates... that Ethanol
        adds to the economy all around... adds over $32 Billion
        to employment... $7.9 Billion to taxes and local
        services... causing US employment of over 380,000
        folks with good paying jobs.

        Except for loss of income to Big Oil (who are doing just
        fine anyway) there is no down side... and billions of
        subsidies to grain agriculture are gone/not needed. A
        great deal all around! Husky in Canada is doing great...
        good we have Oil folks up here that do not skew and in
        the same way spew misinformation quite the same!

        Cheers

        Comment


          #5
          And what about Bitumen production? More energy expended than what is derived from its extraction? Check that one out Tom and think you would be surprised at what you would find also.

          Comment


            #6
            Where are your numbers Willy?

            Comment


              #7
              ColevilleH2S: I don't have any...that's why I asked Tom to check it out...for comparison purposes. He's good at finding stuff like that and besides he has nothing better to do apparently.

              Comment


                #8
                Willy,

                I consider Ethanol and checking the stability of US
                production/prices of corn an important part of my job
                of understanding risk management. Oil sands oil
                cost... I do not directly see as an issue in the
                production and sale of our grains. Crude oil prices in
                general are important globally. Crude oil is related to
                grain prices but corn affects our prices going forward
                MUCH more...

                Cheers

                Comment


                  #9
                  Tommy'll is busy workin on Alberties
                  budget whoes right now wit his
                  Conservative cronies in Calgary.

                  Good fer the usa, finally doin something
                  right and putting the screws to oil
                  producing countries fer a change. To
                  bad/sad that Comedia is being victimized
                  two. Butt change is constant. Maybe
                  our energy prices'll fall. Probably not
                  though, they'll go up cousin the oilies
                  have no place to sell their shit now,
                  ha, ha, ha..........

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Wilagro The reason I know your statement about energy balance in the oilsands is complete BS, is because even after the Albertie and Comedian Governments steal their share of money out of the project, and and after the companies pay dividends to their pension fund shareholders, it all continues to operate at a profit after decades and decades of operation.

                    Logic would dictate if more was going in than coming out, it would eventually run out and stop, and it hasn't. So I call bullshit.

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...