I don't get the arguement about stolen farmer's assets as all assets should still be there to be used. The assets are not stolen and put in Harper's back yard. Contingency fund maybe could have an argument but it would not get distributed fairly anyway so why not use it for future use where is what it was for in the first place.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
S. Korneychuck strikes back! Take that Minister Ritz!!!
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
The railcars still had debt booked against them. So if they sold them to the new cwb, before farmers get paid anything the outstanding debt has to be paid.
I was in the camp that thought there should be a payout for assets. But after it was explained the debt had to be paid, it was understandable.
Then I was angry that the cwb deducted all that money and never paid the railcar debt off.
Either way there should be a public accounting for the assets. Or at least to farmers there should be an explanation of how the assets are transferred. A foot note in the new cwb's annual report won't cut it.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment