• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

commissions and assosiations

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    No Dan, the issue IS refundable checkoff or non
    refundable checkoff.

    That is the issue so dont try to camoflauge it.

    How can an arranged marriage of co-operation
    working amongst the 'little groups' work ?Is
    legislatied co-operation simply one big forced
    money pot dished out by Chief GrainBowl, but
    still another Wheat Board, isn't it.

    National vs local representation
    Dairy industry ends up the inevitable model.

    I have observed a lot of per diems and schemes,
    and brilliant salespitches and expense sheets,
    and research papers. One thing stands out:
    farmers pay for that which is of more benefit to
    others. Value is questionable, at the kindest.
    pars.

    Comment


      #32
      Farm Ranger the 4-5 buck a tonne is from $800 a tonne pinto beans and kidney beans are $1100 a tonne at .5% that makes $4 to $5.5 per tonne

      the cereal commision or association is where we need to go,
      thats the suggestion, this may be a long way to go but there are intrests from cereal to cereal that cross boundrys,
      the local vs international issues you are correct, couldnt we have provincal commitees to deal with crop insurance (provincial) and variety trials (regional)?
      its just time we start putting the tables together.
      the world is becomming very small.

      Parsly isnt the only non refundable check-off Sask Pulse?

      the others (at least manitoba) are all refunable on request
      heres an interesting fact if i sell edible beans to the U.S i pay northarvest check off and mb checkoff

      Comment


        #33
        You've made a good point. Same beans are
        checked-off, and checked-off and checked-off.
        You'd enjoy .

        That is why all checkoffs should be made on a
        voluntary basis. not an automatic checkoff where
        the onus is on a producer like me to request
        refunds. it is, after all, my money.

        And you could voluntarily double your Ca-Ching.
        Ca-Ching. Ca-Ching when your eyes were
        amazed at the benefits. it is after all, your money
        Pars

        Comment


          #34
          thanks for all the replys im gonna repost the newspaper article under a new thread called Farm Leadership

          and we will start again

          Comment


            #35
            pars
            i get your point.
            let me know whitch checkoffs are non refundable?
            i would like to know

            Comment


              #36
              Checkoffs are mandatorally, legislatively
              collected. They can be refunded, but farmers
              ARE forced to pay That should not be. That was
              buckets point. That was and remains my point.
              What do you not understand about mandatory?
              The forced part? The non-opt out part? Or the
              obligation to pay part?

              Next, a national mandatory levy seems to be in
              the hatching and we hear the crowing. I'm
              listening.

              When local and provincial levies are forcefully
              collected by law, any national organization will
              also be tempted to lobby for more forced
              collection, and thrn for it to become non-
              refundable.

              Countless small farms in Quebec, could easily
              outvote larger Western counterparts, to get a
              hIgher% of the levymoney raise the levy, and
              make bloody sure it was non-refundable.

              If Western farmers requested a total of 75% of
              the booty in a given year, and contractual
              obligations were unmet, it wouldn't take much
              time before the checkoff would be non-
              refundable, would it. Pars

              Comment


                #37
                Parsley. What is stopping you from requesting
                your checkoof dollars back and starting your own
                organic association to lobby government about
                everything you just wrote down. Checkoffs will
                never be non refundable and I personally have
                never received a per dime cheque ever! In fact
                over the years I am out tens of thousands of
                dollars volunteering my time on these boards and
                I take great exception to your comments that
                unless you went to jail your just a boy or girl
                Many people have worked very hard on these
                files and i have personally,in public, given much
                credit to those who fought these battles for
                decades and by timing alone some of us were in
                leadership roles when the changes came about. If
                you want to direct your ignorant comments to me
                lets do it but throwing generalities out there is
                pretty classless

                Comment


                  #38
                  vvalk

                  Its pretty ****ing simple. You guys want to have a new organization called the saskatchewan wheat commission.

                  You have already talked to the minister of agriculture and got the ok.

                  Its pretty futile I know, but did any of you actually think of asking the following:

                  1. Would you be in favour of supporting a wheat commission? yes or no.


                  2. If yes would you like a mandatory refundable check off? yes or no.


                  3. Would you support the wheat commission to a certain level like a financial cap?



                  Along with that could go a bunch of info on your aspirations and dreams of what to do with the money.


                  Instead you chose to ram this down the throats of wheat producers.

                  Or maybe I missed the memo.

                  I think you make good points about the paperwork to ask for money back, but its just as easy to have the paperwork in place to ask for the money in the first place.

                  I have no problem when asked, I squawk a little when told.

                  I will repeat myself again and ask, what would be wrong with a cap on checkoffs?

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Nothing wrong with being a classless broad when
                    your purse is being robbed.

                    I was mugged in Regina at a wedding hotel. but
                    the mugger, not I,  ran for the door.  I'm not a
                    victim because I actually figured out I was 
                    BEING mugged and who the mugger was.  

                    Sometimes muggers are dressed in suits. 

                    I have no intention of supporting having to apply
                    for a refund of my own  money, that any working
                    group, (consisting of a handfull of producers),
                    have decided to have automatically have
                    extracted from my purse.

                    True business thinkers don't think or act that way. 

                    Chambers  of Commerce do not apply automatic
                    deductions when I incorporate a business. . They
                    court membership.  Neither do they have a
                    vendetta against these who CHOOSE  to not join  
                    That is what decent businessmen  do, unlike the
                    attack on bucket who had the audacity to
                    question the auto -deduction-process.

                    In my world, any decent leader or any decent
                    government leader would not consider
                    automatically deducting fees from from me
                    without my explicit permission. 

                    So get the concept straight, vvalk. Either you
                    believe .....my $29.95 is mine,  and your
                    countless $10K's that you chose to devote is
                    yours .....or you don't. 

                    I refuse to agree that begging to get back my
                    money, which I never gifted in the first place, is a
                    sound business practice on which base  raising
                    funds. 

                    Many producers look to  a world of socialism. a
                    world I don't support,  where ppl look to others to
                    pay for their  unaffordable schemes. 

                    Just don't call yourselves businessman. 
                    Pars 

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...