I'd be curious as to the legality of a contract that
allows one side to breach the fundamental terms
of the contract. Effectively, it removes the ability
of the farmer to realize any benefit from the
contract at the sole discretion of the company.
I was told that a contract has to have
consideration for both sides. If the consideration
for one side is revokable without penaltyor
needing a reason, is it really consideration?
allows one side to breach the fundamental terms
of the contract. Effectively, it removes the ability
of the farmer to realize any benefit from the
contract at the sole discretion of the company.
I was told that a contract has to have
consideration for both sides. If the consideration
for one side is revokable without penaltyor
needing a reason, is it really consideration?
Comment