From the CWB bulletin:
"Rogers Foods Ltd. announced last week that it will build a new flour mill in Chilliwack, B.C. Services provided by the CWB, including supply assurance and professional/technical assistance, were factors in Rogers Foods' decision to locate within Western Canada."
Questions:
Now what do you suppose the supply assurance might have cost the captive suppliers? Put another way, what is it worth to Rogers?
Does a monoploy have to provide this in order for new developments such as this to occur?
What about existing end users who might threaten (or bluff) to close and leave...do they get similar assurances?
How would the CWB 'benchmark' the value of these assurances to end users to assure themselves and us that this will return more money to farmers?
Does the single desk premium that we are assured we get offset the supply assurances?
And the professional services. What exactly is the CWB "professional" at that Rogers foods would not already possess of have commercial access to?
"Rogers Foods Ltd. announced last week that it will build a new flour mill in Chilliwack, B.C. Services provided by the CWB, including supply assurance and professional/technical assistance, were factors in Rogers Foods' decision to locate within Western Canada."
Questions:
Now what do you suppose the supply assurance might have cost the captive suppliers? Put another way, what is it worth to Rogers?
Does a monoploy have to provide this in order for new developments such as this to occur?
What about existing end users who might threaten (or bluff) to close and leave...do they get similar assurances?
How would the CWB 'benchmark' the value of these assurances to end users to assure themselves and us that this will return more money to farmers?
Does the single desk premium that we are assured we get offset the supply assurances?
And the professional services. What exactly is the CWB "professional" at that Rogers foods would not already possess of have commercial access to?
Comment