Charlie, apologies.. jumped in a bit soon there and didnt
look at the references cited on the paper I posted (there is
another pdf that has the references). I was 'assuming' the
canola data used was based on GM varieties, however when
reviewing the information cited I see most of it comes from
data collected prior to GM of canola. Assumptions are never a
good thing.
look at the references cited on the paper I posted (there is
another pdf that has the references). I was 'assuming' the
canola data used was based on GM varieties, however when
reviewing the information cited I see most of it comes from
data collected prior to GM of canola. Assumptions are never a
good thing.
Comment