With the left wing politicians this issue is not about economics, it's about "evil" oil and their dislike of it.
The economics behind Keystone (which Mulcair travelled to Wahington to campaign against) is acquiring a Brent Crude price instead of a landlocked oil price or Brent - rail freight.
No matter how you slice it Bucket, oil on the railways is competition to moving grain. The CTA will factor in demand for the railway services vs supply.
Than there is the delays caused by not enough cars or pulling power which caused some non-stop howling on here during the 2013-2014 crop year. So saying hauling millions of barrels of oil on Canadian railways doesn't cost farmers $ is insanity.
The economics behind Keystone (which Mulcair travelled to Wahington to campaign against) is acquiring a Brent Crude price instead of a landlocked oil price or Brent - rail freight.
No matter how you slice it Bucket, oil on the railways is competition to moving grain. The CTA will factor in demand for the railway services vs supply.
Than there is the delays caused by not enough cars or pulling power which caused some non-stop howling on here during the 2013-2014 crop year. So saying hauling millions of barrels of oil on Canadian railways doesn't cost farmers $ is insanity.
Comment