your question is too simplistic.
as i explain to the wife money is money. it's all the same . where it came from does not matter. and whose money is
spent on what does not really matter.
there are so many $ period.
example health car spending.
Canada spends 60% of what the USA spends per person.
the cdn. cost is mostly govt. spending
the USA cost is mostly not a govt. expenditure , but still has to be paid.
you could cut out a huge amount of govt.spending by ending medicare.
only to pay 40% more in total.
the money all comes from the same place.
you can cut public research as Harper has done. (to cut gov. spending)
only to have it cost the public way more in the end.
instead of having a resistant seed or a new drug developed by govt. spending.
you instead get a corporate seed or drug which according to Harper's new rules, you will have to pay for every year til the end of time.
not a govt. expense but still has to be paid.
certainly govt. s waste money.
the senate , Canada's action plan adds.
5 billion to hand the dairy industry to private hands.
resource gifts to corporations, by way of poor royalty structures.etc. etc.
cutting govt. expenditures just for the sake of doing it,
makes no sense.
even our little small town wanted to cut expenditures 20 years ago.
had a private guy build and own the building which the town leased space.
after 20 years of paying and having nothing to show for it .
now they want to build to save money.
the Conservative plan is always to govern so poorly as to reinforce their govt. is bad theory .
as i explain to the wife money is money. it's all the same . where it came from does not matter. and whose money is
spent on what does not really matter.
there are so many $ period.
example health car spending.
Canada spends 60% of what the USA spends per person.
the cdn. cost is mostly govt. spending
the USA cost is mostly not a govt. expenditure , but still has to be paid.
you could cut out a huge amount of govt.spending by ending medicare.
only to pay 40% more in total.
the money all comes from the same place.
you can cut public research as Harper has done. (to cut gov. spending)
only to have it cost the public way more in the end.
instead of having a resistant seed or a new drug developed by govt. spending.
you instead get a corporate seed or drug which according to Harper's new rules, you will have to pay for every year til the end of time.
not a govt. expense but still has to be paid.
certainly govt. s waste money.
the senate , Canada's action plan adds.
5 billion to hand the dairy industry to private hands.
resource gifts to corporations, by way of poor royalty structures.etc. etc.
cutting govt. expenditures just for the sake of doing it,
makes no sense.
even our little small town wanted to cut expenditures 20 years ago.
had a private guy build and own the building which the town leased space.
after 20 years of paying and having nothing to show for it .
now they want to build to save money.
the Conservative plan is always to govern so poorly as to reinforce their govt. is bad theory .
Comment