Shows how stupid it is to base your economy on oil

[Hamloc]

Why did we end up with oil as our biggest export? Because of all the things Canada produced it was the most in demand. Ontario based it's wealth on manufacturing the high wages, high dollar, high taxes, and the raising price of electricity cut that almost in half.

We export 3 million barrels a day and we import 600000 all into eastern Canada, interestingly 300000 of that comes from North and South Dakota now. Everybody wants more value added processing of oil in Canada, we obviously have the oil to do it. The problem as I see it is that at present it appears we are already a net exporter of refined fuels, is there the market for more? And if the enviros won't let us build a pipeline will they let us build a refinery? The greatest number of jobs in the oil industry is in exploration and building production facilities and pipelines.

Riders still haven't answered your question. I am not sure anyone can. Look at our governments, every time we have a downturn their solution is to build infrastructure and go in debt to do it. Let's be realistic by the time someone in government realizes a good business opportunity exists the opportunity has already passed, beauacracy moves to slow. And creating false economies with subsidies doesn't work either, look at green electricity in Ontario.


All I know is that with the constant growth and cost of government we need strong economic growth to pay for it and it is not happening. With an upcoming lowering of interest rates by the BOC I guess the Libs are hoping a lower dollar will stimulate foreign investment or more exports. No real answer, have a good day :-)

[TOM4CWB]

How stupid!!!!

Your own words Riders.

Domestic western CDN price is already 66 percent of world price... because only expensive transport is available... so $30us$ is $20...

[chuckChuck]

Beyond petroleum


Growth is shifting from the oil-producing west back to the traditional economic heartland. Political power could shift with it
Jan 31st 2015 | TORONTO | From the print edition

“THE oil industry isn’t remotely the entire Canadian economy,” declared the prime minister, Stephen Harper, on January 22nd. That is not a startling statement. Production of crude oil represents just 3% of Canada’s GDP. The surprise is that Mr Harper felt he has to state the obvious. In an economy dominated by services, Mr Harper and his Conservative Party have cast themselves as champions of the oil industry, which is centred in Alberta, his adopted home province.

He pulled Canada out of the Kyoto protocol on climate change and promoted the Keystone XL pipeline that would carry Alberta bitumen to refineries in the southern United States. He has likened the development of Alberta’s tar sands to building the Great Wall of China. Canada, the fifth-largest producer of crude oil (which makes up 14% of exports), is an “emerging energy superpower”, Mr Harper has proclaimed.
In this section
But the drop in oil prices—by more than half since last June—has checked that boastfulness. It has shifted the engines of economic growth from western Canada to the central provinces of Ontario and Quebec, which concentrate on services and manufacturing. The weakness in the energy sector prompted a surprise cut in interest rates by the Bank of Canada on January 21st. The federal government, which usually delivers its budget by the end of March, has put that off until April at the earliest. Volatile energy markets make it impossible to predict revenue accurately, says Joe Oliver, the finance minister. These wobbles are awkward for Mr Harper, who hopes to win this October’s general election by campaigning on the Conservatives’ record of economic competence.

Canada is hardly Venezuela, whose oil-dependent economy is expected to contract by 7% this year. The central bank predicts growth of 2.1% this year and 2.4% in 2016. That is modest, but it is no worse than the 2.1% average of the past two years. The unemployment rate, at 6.7%, is relatively low. While the energy slump will boost some parts of the country, it will depress others. Oil-rich Alberta, which has grown faster than the rest of Canada for the past 20 years, will enter recession this year, predicts one think-tank, the Conference Board of Canada.

Hence the central bank’s decision to reduce the target for its key interest rate by a quarter of a percentage point from 1%, its level since September 2010. This puzzled the financial markets. Core inflation is 2.2%, well within the bank’s target range. Lower rates could encourage consumers, who are already carrying record levels of debt, to take on even more. Stephen Poloz, the central bank’s governor, acknowledged the risk but argued that the recession in the oil industry made it worth taking. He fears that the loss of jobs, investment and export income from the energy sector will eventually spread to other parts of the economy. The rate cut, he said, was like taking out an insurance policy.

Ontario and Quebec, which account for more than half of Canada’s GDP, see less reason to worry. They are home to large manufacturing industries, such as cars and aerospace, which have long complained that the oil-fuelled rise in the Canadian dollar was damaging their competitiveness. The currency has fallen by 15% against the American dollar since June, giving exports a boost, and may weaken further because of lower interest rates. Strong growth in the United States, Canada’s biggest trading partner, bodes well for manufacturers. Ontario is set to replace Alberta this year as the growth leader.

This shift in economic bragging rights has given a lift to the Liberal Party, which governs some of the perkier provinces and holds a narrow lead over the Conservatives in national opinion polls. Kathleen Wynne, Ontario’s Liberal premier, has cheekily offered to help devise a national energy strategy, tramping into Alberta’s bailiwick. The finance minister of Liberal-led Quebec credits low oil prices with helping him balance the province’s budget (while Alberta faces a C$7 billion, or $5.6 billion, revenue drop).

This jauntiness, less than a year away from the next general election, is unlikely to please the petroleum-spattered prime minister. To counter it, Mr Harper will remind voters incessantly during the forthcoming campaign that Canada emerged faster than other members of the G7 club of big economies from the 2008 financial crisis, with its banking system intact.

There are two threats to his campaign plan. The first is that, as the central bank fears, the petro-plunge will pull down growth overall. The second is that the economy will continue to do relatively well but that the Conservatives will not get credit for it. The government’s contortions over the budget make that second prospect more likely. Mr Oliver promised a balanced budget as recently as January 26th, despite the expected drop in revenues from the energy industry. The government had pledged a raft of tax reductions once that was achieved, but imprudently enacted them late last year. The delay in presenting the budget adds to the impression of fiscal disarray. Justin Trudeau, the Liberals’ leader and a former teacher, mocked Mr Oliver’s excuse for delaying the budget as the political equivalent of “The dog ate my homework”.

Mr Harper is a skilled political scrapper; he may well find a way to turn the shift away from oil-led growth to his advantage. His proclamation that the economy is about more than energy is a beginning. Now he must persuade Canadians that is true of the Conservatives, too.

[chuckChuck]

Macleans on Dec.9th 2015 published 50 charts on the economy that give a good picture of what is happening. They are definately worth a look. Link is at the bottom.

Greed and fear those are the ingredients that shape the market. Fear is dominating now but the old timers in the oil industry knew it was coming, it was just a matter of when.

I will bring it up again but it is obvious that Norway had planned for this day setting aside a trillion dollars and Canada mis-managed the resource boom. The blame rests with governments and the people who elected them.

http://www.macleans.ca/economy/economicanalysis/the-most-important-charts-for-the-canadian-economy-in-2016/