Is anyone else tired of our little premier yapping

[stonepicker]

So mustard, you and others don't agree with oil companies getting tax breaks and such, even though you would have to agree that oil companies put a huge amount of money back into the economy through high wages etc. ( isn't that what profitable co's should do as in pay their employee's well? ) Do you agree with the billions of dollars being given in subsidy's to solar and wind power projects?

[bobofthenorth]

I can't imagine that there are enough socialists in SK to elect Broten in April. I guess in a way we could thank PM Selfie and Stephanie Ding Dong for focusing our anger with NEP Ver II but I'm about 110% sure the Wall government will be re-elected regardless of what the lesser of 2 Trudeaus does. There's plenty of us who can remember what it was like under the socialists, no matter how the likes of mustardman want to distort the picture. I'd like to say "never again" but that might be unduly optimistic. Maybe I can at least hope for "not in my lifetime".

[bobofthenorth]

Sorry about the 2nd post but this forum software is prehistoric.

Mustard: the "new energy system" is called nuclear. Can I assume you support that? If so then I'll agree with you that it is long past time to move in that direction.

[stonepicker]

Hey bobofthenorth, does that mean that sask. is a rat-free province?

[mustardman]

Bob nuclear was developed during the 40's to blow people up.
It's not New tech and the ONlY investors it will ever have is govt . Look up money pit in the dictionary and the answer is Nuclear power.
As an investor I mite as well invest in the telegraph system as nuclear

There is a form of nuclear that would work But it's not the form we are using that creates spent fuel rods that we have to find a hiding place for

[bucket]

Caseih

True about the extension of oilsands to saskatchewan.

Stonepicker

The high wages are great until those people end up on government assistance.
If oil had bottomed at 55 bucks a barrel I think it may have worked out better.

[bobofthenorth]

Mustard that is the most juvenile thinking. Any technology can be used for good or evil - a scalpel can as easily cut your jugular as it can remove a tumour.

I assume from your comments that the so-called new technologies which you support are those that can only exist by virtue of massive government subsidies.

[mustardman]

No one invest in nuclear Except Governments
There is no more Expensive energy source

[SASKFARMER3]

One big nuke plant north of PA feeding south should of been built right away! Give local native groups share portion also province a share! We're home of the worlds largest nuke fuel source yet we have none! But again that's the NDP way.
Nothing ever happened here move along leave us be here is a civil servant job welcome to the NDP party.
Never again at least in my life time! They destroyed our province.

[mustardman]

The boundary Dam project has cost $2000 per tonne of Carbon that it has captured!!!!
(But thats ok cause it's helpng the oil industry ...? )

And Mr Wall thinks $ 15 per tonne is too much ??
Time for batteries in your calculator Brad

[LEP]

Mustard, lean cost $1,500 to save a dollar and carbon capture cost $2,000 for every tonne captured.

Sounds like you are reading verbatim from The Commonwealth.

Better find a more accurate source of information.

[mustardman]

Maybe the Truth hurts?
I know sask party doesn't talk about these points but they never seem to admit when they're wrong

Lean facts. $1500 to save a Dollar
Put out by an economist

Carbon capture has been estimated at 625,000 tonnes. Multiply this times $2000 and this gives you the cost of our little project that they've been promoting round the world
Another of Baby face Bill Boyd's Billion Dollar Schemes that doesn't work