Is anyone else tired of our little premier yapping

[mustardman]

The boundary Dam project has cost $2000 per tonne of Carbon that it has captured!!!!
(But thats ok cause it's helpng the oil industry ...? )

And Mr Wall thinks $ 15 per tonne is too much ??
Time for batteries in your calculator Brad

[LEP]

Mustard, lean cost $1,500 to save a dollar and carbon capture cost $2,000 for every tonne captured.

Sounds like you are reading verbatim from The Commonwealth.

Better find a more accurate source of information.

[mustardman]

Maybe the Truth hurts?
I know sask party doesn't talk about these points but they never seem to admit when they're wrong

Lean facts. $1500 to save a Dollar
Put out by an economist

Carbon capture has been estimated at 625,000 tonnes. Multiply this times $2000 and this gives you the cost of our little project that they've been promoting round the world
Another of Baby face Bill Boyd's Billion Dollar Schemes that doesn't work

[boarderbloke]

mustard, riders, bucket, and any other tree hugging leftist. How much carbon tax are you willing to pay on your farms, for the food you grow to feed all your friends and relatives that live off farms and in the cities, plus all those other people living there that you don't know and will never meet?

How much carbon tax are YOU WILLING to ABORB in the costs of operating your farm to subsidise all the others.

You know damn well that the prices at CBoT, MGE, ICE, KCBT, won't be going up on account you, as a farmer, have to pay the PM SELFIE Carbon TAX.

So, again, How much Carbon Tax are you willing to absorb for the food you grow for others?

[bobofthenorth]

The nuclear argument flushes the socialists out of the woodwork every time. If they really believed their drivel about carbon emissions then we could solve all the world's carbon emissions in 10 years by going nuclear. And at a fraction - a tiny fraction - of the cost of all the solar, wind, biomass - you name it - bullshit. But none of them will even consider the nuclear solution which proves how little they really care about the environment and how much they really care about income redistribution.

[mustardman]

Famous last words at the Titanic shipbuilding yards "why spend money on lifeboats ,this ship is Unsinkable "

The money we will spend Later to try TooLate to fix this shit show we are heading toward will make a carbon tax look like small change

[freewheat]

The money we will spend Later to try TooLate to fix this shit show we are heading toward will make a carbon tax look like small change

Enlighten us what we are heading towards?

[Guest]

yea enlighten us mman ????? im confused also ?

[mustardman]

If you have to ask in 2016 then I won't try and explain it to you

[Oliver88]

mustard, riders, bucket, and any other tree hugging leftist. How much carbon tax are you willing to pay on your farms, for the food you grow to feed all your friends and relatives that live off farms and in the cities, plus all those other people living there that you don't know and will never meet?

How much carbon tax are YOU WILLING to ABORB in the costs of operating your farm to subsidise all the others.

You know damn well that the prices at CBoT, MGE, ICE, KCBT, won't be going up on account you, as a farmer, have to pay the PM SELFIE Carbon TAX.

So, again, How much Carbon Tax are you willing to absorb for the food you grow for others?

Great questions for the socialists and PM Selfie voters to answer.

Also, the reason the NDP is against lean is that it will likely lead to a reduction in redundant jobs that are not an effective use of tax payers $....they aren't worried about the service being provided for the residents but are focused only on union jobs/fees.
Being so opposed to a system that improves your efficiency is very bizarre.

The point about the socialists not caring about GHG when they oppose nukes is a discussion ender as well. You can't be against nuclear power if you think GHG emissions should be reduced.

[freewheat]

If you have to ask in 2016 then I won't try and explain it to you

Yup. It's 2016. Go for it! I am guessing you are talking a climate change disaster? That a tax on carbon will fix? Before it's too late? Am I close?

[mustardman]

Oliver88. God that's an old tractor

Anyways I am all in favour of Lean IF it would have been tried in one health region to see if would work.
When it was implemented Province wide and was questionable and the health minister insisted that its the only way ....and itNow it comes out that $1500 was spent to save a ****in dollar !!
This is not as noticeable when Times are good...
.
As far as Nukes again it is the THE MOST expensive energy source in the world and you have to deal with an Extremely dangerous waste product that NEVER goes away

[mustardman]

Oliver this is the Difference between conservatives and socialist,

Socialist try to save and be careful on the spending whereas conservatives SPEND like crazy
( check out our current deficit after 10 years of exceptional commodity prices)

[bobofthenorth]

Mustard I'd really like to know what you are inhaling or injecting. Nuclear is the cheapest energy source by a long stretch. The initial capital cost is steep but the operating costs are negligible and that old canard about it lasting forever is nonsense. The uranium has been in the ground in SK since time immemorial - what we should be doing is renting out the yellowcake and taking it back afterwards and then charging utilities to store it forever.

As I recall the federal budget was in surplus until your friend PM Selfie came along. Don't expect to see that one balanced again in the next 8 years.

Socialists will be socialists but if you really care about the environment the answer is simple and nukes are the answer.

[Hamloc]

Mustardman look at Ontariowe enough said!!