And as for the supporting quotes that appear....its pretty clear that three documents in a row are designed to present a compelling volume of all the same message.
Thus the conclusion that that literature says exactly what your gut feelings are. Some claims (or all claims actually) deserve to have the flip side present to. That Chuck doesn't do.
Anyone who felt otherwise would shown some interest or "compassion" regarding at least some of the pretty compelling points. Only those who are very myopic would dismiss all responses in previous daysresponses (to your and similar threads).
I'm afraid that debating or offering counterpoints is a total waste on certain people; but there's always some hope that the general population will also see points presented and not just pages of quotes from purported experts.
Thus the conclusion that that literature says exactly what your gut feelings are. Some claims (or all claims actually) deserve to have the flip side present to. That Chuck doesn't do.
Anyone who felt otherwise would shown some interest or "compassion" regarding at least some of the pretty compelling points. Only those who are very myopic would dismiss all responses in previous daysresponses (to your and similar threads).
I'm afraid that debating or offering counterpoints is a total waste on certain people; but there's always some hope that the general population will also see points presented and not just pages of quotes from purported experts.
Comment