I was recently told that we can use discretion on which year to put income or expenses into if it is comes close to the year end. Is that true? If I receive a check written 3 days before year end, arrives 2 days after, I always used the date it was written. Same with expenses, but having some flexibility would be good.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Year End for taxes, Is overlap allowed?
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Tags: None
-
Lep, your expense comment I think is not totally correct. Expenses would be the date the transaction is negotiated.
That being said, some input guys here keep the books open for a while into the new year so that Dec 31 purchases can be made with the prior year date yet
If paying by credit card this wouldn't work as the transaction will have a automated date on it (at least with the new Cr Card machines)
As far as the comments about if incorporated it doesn't matter, I would think many farms about 4000 acres would sstruggle keeping the cash income under $500,000 so therefore may be prebuying/defering to manage it within that if possible
Comment
-
Yes, since it is still on the cash method for income tax, a 5000 acre or more farm with a couple good years could struggle to keep the income below this
It depends more on the amount of land payments being made. With interest rates generally lower the majority is all on the loan - which you don't get to use as an expense.
Comment
-
I think CRA let's farmers manipulate their income/expense statemente by allowing deferrals, prebuys, and inventory adjustments to stabalize their income.
Comment
-
Hoppy, things have to be lower than grim to collect Ag-stab benefits. Olympic averages and the lower of that or allow eligible expenses makes it pretty tough. It is hardly worth being in, it isn't. I don't know anyone that collected in a long time...or at least they never boasted about it.
Comment
-
Should have mentioned accrual accounting which gives true picture of profit and loss and used for agristability.
Suspect that most who collect do not talk about it on a forum like this.
United States dept of agric took close look at agristability, thought it would encourage risky behaviour but brought in subsidized revenue insurance which is not that much different.
Comment
-
Even locally I haven't heard of anyone collecting. My goodness, even if people farm the program they won't be around long.... and they shouldn't be either.
04 frost last time for us. Program was better designed for payouts then. After the fact they calculated we were overpaid and had to repay some of the benefit.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment