"Wild oats, green foxtail, wild mustard and many other weed seeds generally stay close to their origin and are not likely to be spread by organic farmers to non organic farms."
So you think so. Same should apply to kochia, alfalfa of all kinds and where ever wild animals and birds eat and and move about; and whatever human beings produce and transport. The truth is that bringing seeds and forages in from Alberta(or wherever) brings in their local weed problems... sure as shit.
And there are plenty of weeds already endemic and well established (but not with the same species and relative concentrations throughout the West.
And making it quite plain; that applies to every conventional farming operation and every organic one too.
And as for organic producers worrying about herbicide resistance
"Yes and there are some pretty serious uncontrollable weeds in non-organic fields due to herbicide resistance which is a growing problem all across North America including right on local farms on the prairies. Just ask weed scientists. It is well documented."
When weeds get uncontrollable (by whatever definition the affected farmer may use) just remember that the full arsenel and all the borrowed experience of every organic producer (and everyone's forefathers before 2,4-D powder was brought to SE Sask by forward thinking members of certain Agricultural Societies that I could name.) can be quickly brought out as recommendations if need be.
I'm absolutely sure that those members could see the benefit of minute amounts of chemicals in the control of rampant weeds.
And ponder this quote
"Herbicide tolerant weeds will be a bigger issue and have greater economic impact on crop production because the majority of farms use herbicides on the majority of acres. If that system fails then we are in big trouble. "
Why would this be a big problem. You mean organic techniques could't pick up the shortfall quickly enough. PROBABLY RIGHT. PROBABLY SHOCKING. GOOD FOR THOSE READY FOTHE OPPORTUNITY. BUT PROBABLY BIG TROUBLE as you insinuate. You think farmers couldn't learn again to drive tractors pulling cultivators. You think not many are capable of growing legumes and working organic matter into the soil. You think that comes without trouble in itself; and affects of in effect producing a crop ever two years or so. And there is such a thing as mining soils and alfalfa is a temporary boost to nutient availability because of a deep root system compared to most common prairie crops. That should be taken into account if anyone is thinking of the future beyond a couple decades or so.
But here's the best one that hopefully will engage your brain to weigh what those herbicide tolerant weeds really mean to organic producers.
FIRST....unless there is a conspiracy that created GMO tolerant kochia, foxtail, giant ragweed etc. etc. then those plants probably only got their resistance through natural selection.
You know....the 6 or so magic bullet applications of a new chemical before a few glyphosate (insert any other chemical except maybe some broad leaf 2,4-D products and Buctril M Types) tolerant ones start showing up without any apparent control evidenced after a spray application.
Organic farmers have nothing to additionally fear from these "glyphosate etc" resistant weed seeds that will die equally surely by any rod weeder, cultivator or tillage tool. Quit worrying about herbicide ineffectiveness. Farmers can change if the chemical dependence fails. And the shift in farming practice may very well mean famines and shortages for growing numbers of mouths that may just know how to take what they can from those who can't produce what they need.
If that happens...That one should lie at the feet of those who demanded the changes and spead the misinformation among those who have no idea how the quantity or production method came about. And that goes beyond "no hormones added" and animal cruelty and other popuar causes of the day
The not yet established noxious and prohibitive noxious weeds are a serious matter to everyone who finds themselves
with an additional difficult weed problem....and that deserves the full arsenel of weapons available to control and limit the infestation.
With only clipping the tops off; does anyone really think they can look in the mirror and congratulate themselves on being an adequate land steward or neighbor.
And would those persons also deny a neighbor a buffer zone ( of glyphosate resistant alfalfa etc)that might help contain a disaster on neighboring quarters sections. Those situations do exist, and in some cases it almost appears that it is viewed a deserveable punishment.
There will always be weeds...a variety of them...but it isn't natures way to have everyone of those species everywhere..... and finally it is folly to not allow attempting control at the earliest stages....using every means that is available..
So you think so. Same should apply to kochia, alfalfa of all kinds and where ever wild animals and birds eat and and move about; and whatever human beings produce and transport. The truth is that bringing seeds and forages in from Alberta(or wherever) brings in their local weed problems... sure as shit.
And there are plenty of weeds already endemic and well established (but not with the same species and relative concentrations throughout the West.
And making it quite plain; that applies to every conventional farming operation and every organic one too.
And as for organic producers worrying about herbicide resistance
"Yes and there are some pretty serious uncontrollable weeds in non-organic fields due to herbicide resistance which is a growing problem all across North America including right on local farms on the prairies. Just ask weed scientists. It is well documented."
When weeds get uncontrollable (by whatever definition the affected farmer may use) just remember that the full arsenel and all the borrowed experience of every organic producer (and everyone's forefathers before 2,4-D powder was brought to SE Sask by forward thinking members of certain Agricultural Societies that I could name.) can be quickly brought out as recommendations if need be.
I'm absolutely sure that those members could see the benefit of minute amounts of chemicals in the control of rampant weeds.
And ponder this quote
"Herbicide tolerant weeds will be a bigger issue and have greater economic impact on crop production because the majority of farms use herbicides on the majority of acres. If that system fails then we are in big trouble. "
Why would this be a big problem. You mean organic techniques could't pick up the shortfall quickly enough. PROBABLY RIGHT. PROBABLY SHOCKING. GOOD FOR THOSE READY FOTHE OPPORTUNITY. BUT PROBABLY BIG TROUBLE as you insinuate. You think farmers couldn't learn again to drive tractors pulling cultivators. You think not many are capable of growing legumes and working organic matter into the soil. You think that comes without trouble in itself; and affects of in effect producing a crop ever two years or so. And there is such a thing as mining soils and alfalfa is a temporary boost to nutient availability because of a deep root system compared to most common prairie crops. That should be taken into account if anyone is thinking of the future beyond a couple decades or so.
But here's the best one that hopefully will engage your brain to weigh what those herbicide tolerant weeds really mean to organic producers.
FIRST....unless there is a conspiracy that created GMO tolerant kochia, foxtail, giant ragweed etc. etc. then those plants probably only got their resistance through natural selection.
You know....the 6 or so magic bullet applications of a new chemical before a few glyphosate (insert any other chemical except maybe some broad leaf 2,4-D products and Buctril M Types) tolerant ones start showing up without any apparent control evidenced after a spray application.
Organic farmers have nothing to additionally fear from these "glyphosate etc" resistant weed seeds that will die equally surely by any rod weeder, cultivator or tillage tool. Quit worrying about herbicide ineffectiveness. Farmers can change if the chemical dependence fails. And the shift in farming practice may very well mean famines and shortages for growing numbers of mouths that may just know how to take what they can from those who can't produce what they need.
If that happens...That one should lie at the feet of those who demanded the changes and spead the misinformation among those who have no idea how the quantity or production method came about. And that goes beyond "no hormones added" and animal cruelty and other popuar causes of the day
The not yet established noxious and prohibitive noxious weeds are a serious matter to everyone who finds themselves
with an additional difficult weed problem....and that deserves the full arsenel of weapons available to control and limit the infestation.
With only clipping the tops off; does anyone really think they can look in the mirror and congratulate themselves on being an adequate land steward or neighbor.
And would those persons also deny a neighbor a buffer zone ( of glyphosate resistant alfalfa etc)that might help contain a disaster on neighboring quarters sections. Those situations do exist, and in some cases it almost appears that it is viewed a deserveable punishment.
There will always be weeds...a variety of them...but it isn't natures way to have everyone of those species everywhere..... and finally it is folly to not allow attempting control at the earliest stages....using every means that is available..
Comment