parsley posted Mar 3, 2001 10:49
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That is correct Tom4CWB. There are two parts to the CWB Act. One is the marketing-pooling part. It applies to the Designated Area.
The other part is the Regulatory part and it applies to all of Canada. Right now, the CWB is sliding money out of the DA pooling accounts to pay the regulatory costs in all of Canada. The CWB ACt says they cannot do this. It is illegal.
Look at it another way. The producer in Ontario applies for an export license. He is granted a no-cost license. There is a cost associated with this procedure. But the DA pooling account pays the costs!
On the other hand Chas in Alberta applies for an export license. He is routinely denied.
So Chas pays for the licensing costs of the guy in Ontario who is granted the license.
Meantime, the Act says the Government of Canada must pay those licensing costs.They're not.....
It's the principle of the thing! And the cost as well....over 50 years of downloading regulatory costs on DA producers adds up to a lot of $$$$$.
Only in the CWB, would farmer-directors not even know what the CWB staff are doing.
Parsley
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That is correct Tom4CWB. There are two parts to the CWB Act. One is the marketing-pooling part. It applies to the Designated Area.
The other part is the Regulatory part and it applies to all of Canada. Right now, the CWB is sliding money out of the DA pooling accounts to pay the regulatory costs in all of Canada. The CWB ACt says they cannot do this. It is illegal.
Look at it another way. The producer in Ontario applies for an export license. He is granted a no-cost license. There is a cost associated with this procedure. But the DA pooling account pays the costs!
On the other hand Chas in Alberta applies for an export license. He is routinely denied.
So Chas pays for the licensing costs of the guy in Ontario who is granted the license.
Meantime, the Act says the Government of Canada must pay those licensing costs.They're not.....
It's the principle of the thing! And the cost as well....over 50 years of downloading regulatory costs on DA producers adds up to a lot of $$$$$.
Only in the CWB, would farmer-directors not even know what the CWB staff are doing.
Parsley
Comment