• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ritter claims CWB not agent of Gov't to Media

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Ritter claims CWB not agent of Gov't to Media

    PUBLICATION: The StarPhoenix
    DATE: 2006.12.06


    Wheat Board accuses Tories of ignoring law

    OTTAWA (CP) -- The president of the Canadian Wheat Board says he's being fired by the federal government for obeying the law rather than Conservative policy.

    Adrian Measner made his first public comments Tuesday since being given two weeks' notice by Agriculture Minister Chuck Strahl last week.

    Measner and Ken Ritter, the board's chair, were supposed to address the Commons agriculture committee on Monday, but the meeting was cancelled without explanation after they arrived in Ottawa. It's been rescheduled for Wednesday.

    At issue is a Conservative campaign promise to end the board's long-standing monopoly on wheat and barley sales. The government wants to make participation voluntary, which the board argues would effectively kill the organization.

    Farmers are split on the issue, but a majority of the CWB's board members -- elected by grain producers -- want to keep the single-desk model laid out in the Canadian Wheat Board Act.

    "I find it quite ironic that . . . I have been asked to pledge support for the government's policy of marketing choice, which is not the law," Measner told a news conference on Parliament Hill.

    "In other words, if I continue to obey the law, I will be fired."

    His comments came the same day MPs were howling for the resignation of embattled RCMP Commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli, who was supported by the Conservative government through controversy this year.

    In the House of Commons, Liberal MP Ralph Goodale contrasted the different treatment of Measner and Zaccardelli and asked whether the wheat board president will be given due process.

    "What we're intent on doing is moving toward marketing choice in an open manner," Strahl replied.

    He added that all government appointees serve at the government's pleasure and "are expected to follow along on the government's point of view."

    Measner's pending removal is the latest move in an increasingly bitter battle.

    A plebiscite of farmers on ending the board's barley monopoly will be held in the new year, but no vote is planned for wheat.

    The government has also issued a gag order on the CWB board, saying it cannot use wheat board resources to promote the single-desk model to its membership.

    Goodale said the Conservatives are deliberately knee-capping CWB operations to undermine its effectiveness, a charge echoed by Ritter during an appearance Tuesday at a Senate committee.

    Ritter told the senators the gag order goes to the heart of the CWB's marketing operation.

    "Because of the nature of our organization, everything we do really is indirectly at least commenting on the single desk -- it is the core of what we are," Ritter said.

    The board has launched a lawsuit to overturn the gag order.

    In an interview, Strahl said he met Tuesday with Ritter and told the board chair the CWB must start planning immediately for the end of the barley monopoly.

    Strahl said it is unacceptable the board has not made a contingency plan should farmers vote for choice in barley marketing, which he expects will happen in January.

    The board, for its part, said the government is over-reaching its power.


    "The CWB is not an agent of the government," said Ritter. "It is not a Crown corporation."

    #2
    Sections 3, 6 and 18 of the Canadian Wheat Board Act state:

    Duty to comply

    3.12 (2) The directors and officers of the Corporation shall comply with this Act, the regulations, the by-laws of the Corporation and any directions given to the Corporation under this Act.

    6(1)(j) to act as agent for or on behalf of any minister or agent of Her Majesty in right of Canada in respect of any operations that it may be directed to carry out by the Governor in Council

    Directions by Governor in Council

    18. (1) The Governor in Council may, by order, direct the Corporation with respect to the manner in which any of its operations, powers and duties under this Act shall be conducted, exercised or performed.

    Directors

    (1.1) The directors shall cause the directions to be implemented.....

    Comment


      #3
      1. Read what the CWB Act says.

      2. Read what the Ritter/Measner Board cops say.
      3. Contrast the two.

      Do you believe the Act or the Board cops?

      This is like listening to Canada's top RCMP yesterday explaining how he needed to say his words more carefully.

      Maybe this Board-Cop-Team can apply to the RCMP for Duo-CEO duties.

      They are well qualified.

      Parsley

      Comment


        #4
        Parsley,

        In Fact this since 1998 is a hybred... must take instructions from the Gov. but can make some decisions itself beyond the governments instructions.

        Comment


          #5
          Canadian Wheat Board Dispute Causes Concerns For Customers



          WINNIPEG (Dow Jones)--An ongoing dispute between the Canadian Wheat Board and the federal government is hurting the grain marketing agency’s reputation with its international customers, said President and CEO Adrian Measner during a teleconference from Ottawa Tuesday.



          Measner was in Ottawa, with CWB board chair Ken Ritter, to meet with the House Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food. However, the meeting was canceled without any explanation.



          The government is attempting to end the CWB’s current monopoly on the marketing of western Canadian wheat and barley. The CWB, meanwhile, maintains that farmers should be the ones to determine the future of the company. The growing rift between the CWB and Canada’s minority Conservative government was recently highlighted by a letter sent to Measner from Agriculture Minister Chuck Strahl which was seen as a letter of termination by the CWB.



          As the political drama continues, the CWB is still working at meeting its sales commitments and booking new sales.



          “There isn’t a customer that I meet with that we don’t spend over half of the meeting talking about (the current dispute). They’re trying to understand where their business partner is going to be two or three years down the road,“ said Measner. “They appreciate doing business with us and they appreciate doing business with Canada. And it does have an impact on our reputation.“



          Measner said customers “are wondering why this is happening, and where it is going to end up. I think the sooner this can be brought to a conclusion, the better.“



          On Monday, the CWB filed an application in federal court for a review of the federal order in council issued in October prohibiting the CWB from advocating for the retention of its single desk.



          On Tuesday, Measner and Ritter both extended an olive branch of sorts to the government, asking Strahl to join them in determining where the legal grounds lie with respect to the control of the CWB, saying that the current air of hostility and animosity was not beneficial to farmers. Ritter pointed out that under the CWB Act, the board is to manage and control the organization, but the Minister also has his own directive power, which is creating some of the current uncertainty.



          “This is not about me, this is all about farmers and their right to work together to ensure their economic well being,“ added Measner.



          Source: Phil Franz-Warkentin, Dow Jones Newswires 204-947-1700 resnews@compuserve.com

          Comment


            #6
            AdamSmith,

            The CWB itself is creating the uncertainty.

            If the CWB would be part of the transition team... and negotiate in good faith... no customer would even have cause to question the delivery of products they would like to purchase.

            On the other hand... if the CWB wants to go into a 3 year supply agreement to tie up my wheat... I object.

            The CWB has no right to any wheat or barley unless it has been offered to the CWB under section 32 of the CWB Act.

            This extends only to "A" series 2006 contracts. According to the CWB offer to only accept 80% of this series... the CWB has ample supply to meet all of their customer needs for CWRS and Durum.

            Obviuosly the CWB is blowing smoke.

            Comment


              #7
              Measner said customers “are wondering why this is happening, and where it is going to end up. I think the sooner this can be brought to a conclusion, the better.“

              #1, I'm curious to know what customers he is refering to? Is he refering to the ones that live in a bubble, and haven't been aware that this has been an issue for a very long time and were't aware of the Consevatives promise to end the buying monopoly?

              #2 I wonder what Bubble Boy Measner is telling these customers who also must live in a bubble? I wonder if these customers are aware of what is going on Australia?

              #3 Can Measner be trusted to honestly reflect a customers concern?



              “This is not about me, this is all about farmers and their right to work together to ensure their economic well being,“ added Measner.


              Adrian, you lying SOB, this about, not forcing farmers to work together against their will. There is nothing in what the Conservatives are doing that would prvent anyone anywhere from freely and voluntarily working together.

              And you don't give a damn about farmers in fact you dispise over half of them.

              Adrian needs to be held to account for all his misrepresentions.

              Comment


                #8
                The CWB can make some decisions Tom4CWB, but the Minister can overide what the CWB proposes or does.

                The Minister is the big king pin.

                Parsley

                Comment


                  #9
                  I guess that now Agri-ville is done you believe that you can say what you want A.S. There is no room for the kind of name calling you are engaging in it serves no useful purpose except to throw doubts on your credibility, T4 wouldn't stoop that low even if he thought it. I am surprised the Mayor hasn't stepped on you, perhaps he has more pressing matters.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    "The CWB is not an agent of the government," said Ritter. "It is not a Crown corporation."
                    IP:

                    Ritter didn't bother to explain why every Government that I can remember ( and thats getting to be quite a few ) has had a minister RESPONSIBLE for the Canadian Wheat Board.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      HFL,

                      In the Federal Court of Canada, this is what the CWB said:

                      "...the Board was not and is not
                      not accountable to individual producers. Rather the Board is accountable only to Parliament. Therefore neither the Board or the Crown owed any legal duty to the plaintiffs (farmers).

                      The CWB lies to farmers. Ritter lies to farmers.

                      Ritter must resign.

                      Parsley

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Agstar77,

                        I never personally attacked anyone who is actually participating on this forum. (unless you are Adrian Measner)

                        You guys seem to think you can call Minister Strahl or Prime Minister Harper any name you like or cut them down; my comments about Measner are no different and should be viewed in the same light.

                        If Adrian wants to play in the realm of politics he can expect to be treated in the same manner he treats others.

                        Agstar77, Agri-ville is not the house of commons. If someone is being dishonest or lying, I’m pretty sure we can point that out. And as I said before the man is lying through his teeth about the CWB not being a government agency or that the minister doesn’t have any responsibility here or what this issue is about.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          This is what the court finally says in the M-JAY FARMS ENTERPRISES LTD vs the CWB case:

                          "....whether in fact the plaintiffs have been treated fairly, or may have a legitimate complaint by reason of the actions of the Board, nevertheless, in the view I take of this statute the responsibility is not to any individual producers but rather to the Minister under the Act and finally to Parliament."


                          Parsley

                          Comment


                            #14
                            When the CWB went to the WTO the CWB claimed they were "in essence a farmer co-operative...subject to no direction, supervision or influence by the Government of Canada."


                            So which is it?


                            I agree Asmith. Those CWB boys can lie through their teeth when it suits their purpose.

                            Comment

                            • Reply to this Thread
                            • Return to Topic List
                            Working...