• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ain't the free market great!

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Ain't the free market great!

    Corn Farms Replace New York Lofts as Hottest Property (Update1)

    By Jeff Wilson

    Feb. 20 (Bloomberg) -- Farmland from Iowa to Argentina is rising faster in price than apartments in Manhattan and London for the first time in 30 years.

    Demand for corn used in ethanol increased the value of crop land 16 percent in Indiana and 35 percent in Idaho in 2006, government figures show. The price of a Soho loft appreciated only 12 percent, while a pied-a-terre in Islington near London's financial district gained 11 percent, according to realtors.

    Farmland returns ``will take a quantum leap over the next 18 months,'' after corn prices surged to a 10-year high in February, said Murray Wise, the 58-year-old chairman and chief executive officer of Westchester Group Inc. in Champaign, Illinois, who oversees $460 million of land investments.

    Wise, who was born on a Canadian farm and now manages 85,000 acres, said prices in the U.S. Midwest may gain 12 percent a year through 2017. Farmland rose in value in 34 of the last 37 years, according to data compiled by UBSAgriVest, a unit of UBS AG, the world's biggest money manager. The returns are attracting hedge funds and investment brokers.

    Hancock Agricultural Investment Group in Boston purchased $100 million of farmland in the past year, increasing its holdings by 13 percent to $865 million. Macquarie Bank Ltd., Australia's largest securities firm, plans to spend as much as A$1 billion ($775 million) on ranches in Australia for a new agricultural fund.

    Pergam Finance, a Paris-based investment company with $1 billion in assets, two years ago started Campos Orientales, a fund that buys farmland in Argentina and Uruguay. The company formed a venture with Bellamar Estancias, owned by Argentina's Hirsch family, that manages 120,000 hectares and plans to raise $70 million for farmland acquisitions.

    Australian Pastures

    In Queensland, Australia's biggest cattle-grazing state, land rose by about 10 percent to between A$500 ($394) and A$550 an acre in 2006, said Dick Allpass, a rural property consultant at Adelaide-based Elders Australia Ltd.

    Orders for food and feedstock from China in the last five years helped boost prime Australian farmland by as much as 300 percent, said Wayne Carlson, general manager for agribusiness at Melbourne-based National Australia Bank Ltd., the nation's largest lender.

    ``That rise of the last few years is what has made some of these fund managers and investment groups say, `Why hell, why aren't we in this?''' Carlson said.

    Price Increases

    Average U.S. farm prices increased by 15 percent in 2006, Agriculture Department data show. The cost of buying corn farms in Argentina, the world's second-largest exporter of the grain, jumped 27 percent, according to Buenos Aires industry newsletter Margenes Agropecuarios.

    Marc Faber, a Hong Kong-based investor who manages about $300 million, says one of his favorite stocks is Cresud SA, a landowner in Argentina's Pampas region. The shares jumped 63 percent last year. Farmland is ``very inexpensive in a world of inflated asset prices,'' he said in an interview Feb. 4 from Bermuda.

    The demand for corn used in ethanol got a boost from U.S. President George W. Bush last month, when he urged a fivefold increase in renewable fuels by 2017. To meet Bush's goal, 12.5 billion bushels of corn would be needed, 19 percent more than was harvested last year in the U.S., the world's biggest producer.

    ``It is not the investor that is pushing up land prices, it is the surge in corn prices from ethanol demand,'' said Jim Farrell, chief executive officer at Farmers National Co. in Omaha, which manages almost 1.2 million acres of farmland on 3,700 farms. ``Midwest farmland is predicated by the strength or weakness of corn prices.''

    Corn futures have jumped 82 percent on the Chicago Board of Trade in the past year. They gained 0.6 percent to $4.32 a bushel in electronic trading as of 3:43 a.m. local time

    Less Farmland

    The rally is helped by a reduction in the number of acres available for planting. About 5 million to 8 million hectares of the world's total of 1.5 billion (3.7 billion acres) of farmland goes fallow each year because of deteriorating quality, according to the Worldwatch Institute in Washington, which does research on food production. Crop land also is lost because of development and lack of irrigation, the institute said.

    ``Ethanol is not the only story here -- it is just the one getting headlines,'' said Jeff Conrad, 45, president and managing director for Hancock Agricultural, a unit of Manulife Financial Corp. ``The supply side is the big unknown because we know demand is rising.'' Conrad manages 126,000 acres in the U.S. and 7,000 acres of wine g****s and macadamia nuts in Australia.

    U.S. farmland declined by 9.6 million acres, or 2.8 percent, in the two decades ending in 2001, according to the most recent data available from the government.

    Farm Bulls

    Jim Rogers, the hedge fund manager who predicted the start of the commodity rally in 1999, said global warming will hinder crops and has advised purchasing farmland for at least a decade.

    ``Because of the disruptions, agricultural prices will go through the roof,'' he told reporters in Melbourne on Feb. 7. ``I am extremely bullish on agriculture.''

    To be sure, farmland has seen rallies before that were halted by surging interest rates or plunging commodity prices.

    In the three years ending in 1975, prices rose more than 30 percent annually in Iowa, when the cost of fuel surged during the 1973 Arab oil embargo and the former Soviet Union bought record amounts of U.S. corn and wheat to make up for domestic crop losses. U.S. farmers bought more land with borrowed money.

    Iowa farmland more than tripled from $482 an acre in 1972 to $2,147 in 1981. After the Federal Reserve boosted interest to 20 percent in 1980 and again in 1981 to curb inflation, farmland prices plunged more than 60 percent from 1981 to 1986.

    Interest-Rate Risk

    ``Sharp interest-rate increases are a risk to farmland appreciation'' by boosting the value of the dollar and hurting U.S. crop exports, Conrad said. ``A sustained drop in crude-oil prices would take the shine off the ethanol market,'' he said.

    ``Farmland prices are dependent on commodity prices, which are incredibly volatile,'' said Liam Bailey, head of research at Knight Frank LLP, a real estate agent in London that handles about 25 percent of U.K. farmland sales. ``You have to be prepared to ride the ups and downs. You could see a massive reversal in prices.''

    Returns from farmland have averaged 10.9 percent annually the last 15 years, the National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries in Chicago said. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index of stocks has risen 10.7 percent each year, while the return from the Lehman Government Bond Index was 6.3 percent.

    Iowa Rising

    Home prices fell in half of the cities in the U.S. last quarter, the National Association of Realtors said last week. Prices in 70 U.S. cities including Las Vegas and Washington may drop 10 percent or more between now and 2009 on higher borrowing costs, according to a study by Economy.com, a unit of Moody's Corp.

    Land in Iowa, the biggest U.S. producer of corn and home to the most ethanol plants, surpassed $5,000 an acre from a high of $4,200 a year ago, said Monty Meusch, 55, a vice president for Farmers National Co., a property broker and farmland manager in Omaha, Nebraska. A 200-acre Iowa farm increased 14 percent in a month when it sold for $5,700 an acre in October, he said.

    In Manhattan, the average apartment increased by 3.2 percent last year, the smallest gain in a decade, to $1.22 million, estimates Miller Samuel Inc., the borough's largest appraiser.

    While asking prices soared 62 percent in London's Kensington and Chelsea neighborhoods, the rise in actual sales prices was 16 percent last year to 677,318 pounds ($1.32 million), according to Land Registry and realtor data.

    ``Three years ago people were skeptical about investing in farmland,'' said Olivier Combastet, founder of Pergam. ``It's become much more sexy.''

    He anticipates annual returns of 15 percent in the next five years from his South American land investments.

    To contact the reporter on this story: Jeff Wilson in Chicago at jwilson29@bloomberg.net .

    #2
    You've got a suntanned outlook! Nice to have you back.

    Parsly

    Comment


      #3
      In comparison we have this in the Great Red North.

      Elsewhere in agriculture, wealth is being created, in Canada, annomosity and hostility seems to be the only thing being created in agriculture.

      I fear by the time we get our shinola together (if we ever can) we will be so far behind the rest of the world we may never catch up.

      So, where's the evidence of the superiority of the CWB system again?


      --------------------------------------
      Bull market running past West's barley farmers

      Plebiscite could break wheat board monopoly

      Kevin Libin, National Post
      Published: Monday, February 19, 2007

      CALGARY - A crop-devastating drought in Australia this year has nearly doubled world barley prices in the past few months. But at the annual Western Barley Growers Association (WBGA) conference in Calgary, all farmers can do is complain.

      "I was in Cut Bank, Montana, a week ago and Columbia Grain is paying $4.41 Canadian a bushel for [malt] barley," gripes Rick Wildfong, a barley farmer who travelled here from his farm near Craik, Sask. For his own crop, "I might see three bucks ... I might."


      A lousy deal, and Mr. Wildfong has no choice but to take it. While U.S. and Eastern growers cash in on the barley bull market, Western farmers are, by law, required to sell their malt barley, or any barley type destined for export, to their one and only customer, the Canadian Wheat Board (CWB).

      The barley farmers who gathered last week at a north Calgary convention centre are convinced that needs to change. They are pinning their hopes for a new marketing system on a historic plebiscite now landing in the mailboxes of 80,000 barley farmers from Alberta to Saskatchewan.

      At the conference's registration desk, the 200 attendees could pick up a "vote for choice" sign. Maybe if they put it on their front lawn, they can convince their neighbours to cast their ballot to end the wheat board's monopoly over grain sales in Canada. Because for the first time in the board's 70-year history, it appears possible that its masters in Ottawa are willing, if farmers wish it, to do just that.

      Some worry this plebiscite --farmers are being asked if they prefer the status quo, an option to sell to the wheat board or no wheat board involvement in barley at all -- may be the last stand for the federal Tories on this issue. It took Ottawa a year of bitter fighting with farmers' unions and the government-owned board itself just to get this far.

      "We have a real uphill battle," said Jeff Nielsen, WBGA president. "It's not insurmountable."

      In the past few months alone, Agriculture Minister Chuck Strahl has had to freeze CWB funds to stop directors from mounting an ad campaign attacking Ottawa's reform proposals; in December, he fired CWB president Adrian Measner, a government appointee, for rebelling against his ministry; and this month, he intervened directly after the board refused to pay the new president, Mr. Measner's replacement, claiming it had not been properly consulted about the appointment.

      The CWB, meanwhile, is suing the government, claiming Mr. Strahl has overstepped his authority. Most recently, the board has been accusing the ministry of running a rigged plebiscite: The ballots, it says, are unfairly worded.

      "It's gone even past the normal sense of the matter," Mr. Nielsen said. "This is pure politics. The board is furious at the government."

      Addressing the barley growers' conference on Friday, Mr. Strahl reassured farmers that, despite the difficulties, "as soon as possible my hope is to move toward marketing choice," arguing that the monopoly system is costing farmers income and stifling innovation and entrepreneurship in the industry. Farmers in Ontario, he reminded the crowd, are right now selling their barley at $5.50 a bushel.

      The Minister has called the plebiscite "advisory," meaning non-binding. He insists he will still be the one to decide what reforms, if any, to bring to the CWB. But when those ballots are counted after the March 13 voting deadline, a strong majority for either the pro-choice or pro-monopoly will be hard for Ottawa to ignore, admits Mr. Nielsen. And if farmers come out too strongly endorsing the status quo, Mr. Strahl could lack the political cover he needs to push through his change agenda.

      Predictions are all over the map. Barley growers are generally more anti-monopoly than their wheat-growing peers. Polls show that in Alberta, where half of the country's 12.5 annual tonnes of barley is grown, farmers are overwhelmingly in favour of choice.

      But ideological support for the wheat board remains strong in Manitoba and Saskatchewan, said John De Pape, a grain-industry consultant based in Winnipeg.


      "A lot of farmers still see it as 'everybody helps each other,' " Mr. De Pape said. "I had one farmer say it doesn't matter if the wheat board is successful or not, as long as everybody gets the same."

      Still, the yawning price gap between wheat board malt prices and private-sector rates could not come at a better time for those on the pro-choice side. Farmers today are using the Web and satellite TV to monitor the world market, said David Anderson, a Tory MP, parliamentary secretary to the Minister of Agriculture and a Saskatchewan farmer.

      "Until quite recently, it's been hard for farmers to find out barley prices," he said. "But we can see now there is a big [price] difference between us and our neighbours."

      George Groeneveld, Alberta's Agriculture Minister, believes the days of the wheat board's monopoly are over.

      Most of today's barley growers, he believes, consider themselves as capable of competing in a free marketplace as their peers in Ontario and the United States.

      "These young fellas and women today are very good at marketing their own product," he said.

      When pressed, the Minister predicts the plebiscite will come out in favour of choice. At least he hopes it will. An end to the monopoly would be good for the province's farmers, he said. But he also wants it for his son, who has inherited the family barley farm, and is anxious to give life on the free market a try.

      "The younger generation today simply wants more choice," Mr. Groeneveld said.

      Klibin@nationalpost.com

      Comment


        #4
        Parsley,

        I couldn't even get away from it on the beach in Jamaica.

        Even there, I had Americans asking me about the wheat board.

        Comment


          #5
          Nice to see you catching up to the curve.

          Comment


            #6
            In 1982 farmers were paying up to 125 thousand for a quarter section of farmland in my area, extra clean up work to be done. In 2004 that same land would sell for 65 thousand. Not much in it for an ivestor there, if fact the farmer purchasing in 1982 most went broke or would never do that again. These investors how do they manage these land bases? Here in Canada farmers have a hard time even hiring someone at 20 dollars per hour plus. I think the money is going to be in doing the work yourself, not simply investing in land.

            "About time"

            Comment


              #7
              kamicheal,

              If you had bought land in 2004 for $65,000, you would be close to double that value now, wouldn't you?

              That would have been a good investment wouldn't it?

              TIMING is everything.

              Comment


                #8
                The way I see it, the thing that seperates Western Canada and these other jusisdictions (the USA in particular) is the infusion of big time capital investment by the profesional deep pocket investors into the ag sector.

                I will say I'm getting a little numb from the cwb debate but it does have real world consequences. If the anti- free market mindset continues to win the day and the current phobia towards the big money boys continues, the chances of attracting the necessary capital to catch up to our competitors just wont be there.

                Also to my way of thinking, this is real world evidence of important new found optimism within a sector that has had a hard time generating very much in the way of optimism. Ethenol seems to be the big driver but there is more to it than just that, from what I see occuring.

                So I will ask this question to all. Would it be a good thing or a bad thing if we saw that level of optimism here in western Canada, where there would be ready and eager buyers of farmland (for the continuation of farming) even if it were land management companies and where that demand caused significant increases in land values?

                I think it would be a net good for all involved.



                kamichel even though the article doesn't express it explicitly, I suspect this land is being bought from retiring farmers and rented to local area farmers. So instead of old Mrs. retired farmer or Miss grandpa farmed twenty five years ago owning land and renting it out, the Westchester group owns it and rents it out.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Again guys land values in Canada are cheap cheap cheap compared to the rest of the world. Saskatchewan has taken the brunt of the losses but it is starting to pick up with investors from Alberta or overseas buying. Also business in Sask are starting to purchase farm land.
                  The time to buy is know if you can get it. Can always buy 10 now for 750,000 or more and sell 5 in 10 years and have 5 paid for. Its all timing.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Ok I was a guy who bought 6 quarters in 04 for 65000 a piece. I paid the 17 year loan payment but nothing more. But we have had a tuff go of it for the last 3 years also. Weather not cooperating. My calculations say next year will be the greatest year ever. Today I know I would not get my money out of that land.
                    I know there is a profit to be made but if a farmer cannot take proper care of the land then it is not worth farming.
                    Where are these people supposed to come from to take care of this land? After hour workers are just not going to do it. 100 quarters for sale here but good luck finding someone to farm it.

                    From 1965 to 75 my dad bought land for 5 to 15 thousand per quarter. That would have been the time to invest if you compare 1982 to 125 thousand. Best time to sell.

                    Sorry I just don't get the big hipe over rising land values when fert. machinery is increasing, and labour is hard to come by.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Trust me karichel 5 years from now youll wish you had bought more.

                      Sask farmer you stole that land at what 183 an acre-good move imo.

                      Scrub land in latvia is 1000$ an acre.

                      Our time has come, no cwb,rairoad,government,machiery dealership or fertilizer price is going to stop what is about to happen to us.
                      Our LEVERAGE is the grain price.
                      The LEVER works both ways.
                      "GIVE ME A LONG ENOUGH LEVER AND I"LL MOVE THE WORLD"-cant remember the author

                      Comment


                        #12
                        cp,

                        So are you buying land or hanging on to paper gold or do you have gold door stops?

                        Parsley

                        Comment


                          #13
                          I'm not in gold.
                          I found something twice as rare and fifty times cheaper.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            cp, Uranium?, silver?

                            Comment


                              #15
                              My guess = Uranium

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...