There were several messages that cam e ourt of Barley Freedom Day
1.Although, initially, there was real disappointment over the court decision, committed choice proponents came to the conlusion that this was just one more blip in the choice-radar screen. And the end-reaction was to pull up our socks, dig in and fight harder. A lot of committed folks out there got really ticked off.
2. There was a verbal realization, by so many folks I spoke with, albeit quietly done, that the courts are filled with Liberal hacks.
Example:
When Dave Sawatsky was charged with running the border in the 90's, there was a loophole in that there was no requirement for him to flash his license at the border.
So Goodale quickly slapped in an ammendment to the regulation requiring the next border runner to not only have the license, but to report in at Customs, on the way by. Report in writing.
This ammendment to the regulation of Goodale's was challenged in court, but the court claimed that the Gov in Council has a right to make an ammendment to a regulation.
This time the court said the ammendment to the regulation was a no go.
It's all about politics.
It is a problem for our country.
Big time.
Parsley
PS
So what it means is that the present Governor in Council can reverse the Sawatsky decision, yank out the requirement to report in writing at the border, tell Customs to snooze, and let the CWB hang out to bloody dry because they don't know who is trucking where or when or how much
Skin the CWB cat, I say. And hang the pelt on agstar's tractor antennae.
1.Although, initially, there was real disappointment over the court decision, committed choice proponents came to the conlusion that this was just one more blip in the choice-radar screen. And the end-reaction was to pull up our socks, dig in and fight harder. A lot of committed folks out there got really ticked off.
2. There was a verbal realization, by so many folks I spoke with, albeit quietly done, that the courts are filled with Liberal hacks.
Example:
When Dave Sawatsky was charged with running the border in the 90's, there was a loophole in that there was no requirement for him to flash his license at the border.
So Goodale quickly slapped in an ammendment to the regulation requiring the next border runner to not only have the license, but to report in at Customs, on the way by. Report in writing.
This ammendment to the regulation of Goodale's was challenged in court, but the court claimed that the Gov in Council has a right to make an ammendment to a regulation.
This time the court said the ammendment to the regulation was a no go.
It's all about politics.
It is a problem for our country.
Big time.
Parsley
PS
So what it means is that the present Governor in Council can reverse the Sawatsky decision, yank out the requirement to report in writing at the border, tell Customs to snooze, and let the CWB hang out to bloody dry because they don't know who is trucking where or when or how much
Skin the CWB cat, I say. And hang the pelt on agstar's tractor antennae.
Comment