• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Articles/Commentaries

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Articles/Commentaries

    WINNIPEG FREE PRESS
    April 1, 2008

    By Larry Kusch

    QUOTE
    "Legislation before Parliament to end the Canadian Wheat Board's barley sales monopoly is creating uncertainty among buyers that could lead to lost Prairie sales, the board's departing chairman said Monday.

    Ken Ritter stepped down last week as CWB chairman at the conclusion of a directors meeting in Winnipeg. He was replaced by Larry Hill, a Swift Current, Sask., farmer who, like Ritter, is a strong supporter of the wheat board's single desk marketing powers.

    Ritter, who will remain a director until the end of the year, said grain buyers don't like uncertainty, but that's what they face when looking at buying malting barley from Canada these days.

    "If you're a buyer, who do you buy from?" he said, adding neither the wheat board nor the private trade can absolutely guarantee delivery for the coming crop year at this point in time.

    That could lead buyers to gravitate to Canada's competitors, such as Australia, if other sellers have a quality product.

    "It could lead to lost sales," Ritter said.

    A bill to end the CWB monopoly has received first reading in the House of Commons, but it's still uncertain when MPs will begin to debate it. House leaders for the various parties are still negotiating the timing of such a debate. Opposition parties have so far been cool to the bill, and the Conservatives are in a minority in the House.

    Even if the Commons were to pass the bill before it rises for the summer, on June 20, there's no guarantee it would get through the Senate unscathed, Ritter said. Meanwhile, it's unlikely any changes to the wheat board's mandate would be made after Aug. 1, the start of the grain industry crop year.

    Ritter said if the legislation is doomed to failure, it should be dropped.

    "Creating just a whole bunch of confusion and just leaving a bill sitting on the table when Parliament adjourns is very unhelpful and very disruptive," said Ritter, who cannot run for re-election to another four-year term on the CWB board this fall because of term limit rules.

    Two other incumbents -- Ian McCreary, a monopoly supporter like Ritter, and Jim Chatenay, who opposes the single desk -- also must retire from the board this year. The elections, which will take place this fall in five of 10 Prairie electoral districts, could change the balance of power on the CWB board -- now narrowly controlled by pro-monopoly supporters.

    Ritter said the timing was right for a new person to take over as chairman, as the wheat board's new president and CEO, former Australian sugar marketer Ian White, begins his job this week. White, who was unavailable for comment on Monday, takes over from interim CEO Greg Arason.

    Hill, 64, said in an interview he was pleased by the appointment, which was made by the board of directors, a group consisting of five government appointees and 10 elected farmers.

    "It's going to be an interesting and challenging role. It's going to be a learning opportunity, and I'm looking forward to the challenge," he said.

    Hill and White come to their jobs as the relationship between the wheat board and the federal government is arguably at an all-time low over the barley marketing issue.

    "My point of view is that we have to maintain a professional and respectful approach and we'll try to work with the government on any issue we can," said Hill.

    "Obviously, if we don't agree on an issue, if board policy doesn't agree with the government on an issue, we can't make the kind of headway there we would like. But I think there will be issues of concern to farmers where we should all work together, and we're certainly going to try to do that."


    larry.kusch@freepress.mb.ca "

    UNQUOTE


    Parsley

    #2
    Sound like an Olive Branch to me. Can this Government actually put politics aside and work in the best interests of farmers? Can they admit they must get a majority or at least a House of Commons consensus, before they screw the CWB and farmers. Uncertainty is nobody's friend ,pro or con.

    Comment


      #3
      The CWB could put all of the uncertainty behind us with a single vote acknowledging that the majority of prairie farmers want a voluntary CWB.

      But no, they remain blinded by their left wing ideology and their desire to control their neighbors.

      Comment


        #4
        Some of our neighbours should be controlled as they are trying to screw things up royally. Co-operation in marketing should give better over-all returns in this dog-eat-dog world. The Cargills of the world and their ilk are waiting in the wings for the demise of the CWB.

        Comment


          #5
          You keep selling that corporate conspiracy sunshine, but nobodies buyin'.

          Comment


            #6
            Okay...forget the conspiracy bit and I'll state it as "Some of our neighbours should be controlled."..."as they are redneck dodos."
            -
            Is that better?

            Comment


              #7
              Wilagro,

              Since the 'RedNeck DoDO's' who started this country... gave everything to make sure it did succeed... fought in two world wars... and a bunch more... and now their decendants grow over 80% of the grain produced on the CDN Prairies.... perhaps they should be given a little more credit for their pioneer spirit... and good will towards helping their neighbour... on a voluntary basis... without any government telling them how to shre their resourses.

              Have you so little faith in your neighbours... that you don't believe they would help you... with whatever project you did need help with?

              Why exactly would this be... that you believe a chain and ball must be involved... for co-operation to be productive?

              Comment


                #8
                If the socialists want to control things they should start and end with themselves.

                Comment

                • Reply to this Thread
                • Return to Topic List
                Working...