Where did vaders post go?

[cottonpicken]

???????????????????????????????????????

[agstar77]

Parsley ate it!!!!!!!!!!!

[parsley]

1. I agree with you cotton, Censorship must not be allowed. It is a crucial issie. If I find this site is being censored, I woill porst elsewhere.


2. Is the CWB funding this site, now?

3.I do try to usually ask permission. For example, I keep a file for email permissions, ie Morris Dorosh. I do not ask permission for quotes or excerpts.

4. I emailed Joe Dale this morning and am not satisfied with his reply.

5. Agstar, swallow some Vitamim B12's. They will improve the quality of your posts. You are obviously deficient.

Parsley

[melvill]

Parsley, am I correct in remembering that one of your offspring is a lawyer? Ask him/her whether the legal system considers that censorship is a totally bad thing. My personal lawyer has told me that personal censorship, at least, must be practiced because an individual's freedom of speech ends when that peron's comments infringe on the other's freedom to speak or threaten the other person. Ie., there is no such thing as absolute freedom of speech or absolute personal freedom, for that matter.

[parsley]

Technically, you are not correct.

My son-in-law is a lawyer.

In this case, it would have been sufficient to state that copyrighted material had been removed.

Agri-villers are then able to access the missing material in most newspapers across Canada, in newsletters, or on the internet.

What exactly, was removed?


Parsley

[melvill]

Oh yes, son-in-law. Right. So, under some circumstances, technically you can disavow him being part of your family.

Someone commented to me the other day how a young man, who was initially totally unfit to even date her daughter, had produced the most incredibly adorable grandchildren! Grin!

[parsley]

He's much too fine to disown.

Is the issue here deleting an entire thread in the name of copyright material that could be easily linked?

I think not.

Reason has gone on strike. Are you picketing?

Parsley

[cottonpicken]

Your on the wrong side of the trade mel.

[TOM4CWB]

Parsley,

It is truly incredible... that the CWB has come through locking so many wheat and durum growers... with 3.5mmt of unsold inventory... Locked folks out of sale that could have paid all their debts off totally...

And we as sheep march to the slaughter... narry a word being said... and Vader sticks the knife in and twists it... when he had a $3.32/t export license available to him... and mine was going to cost over $500/t... if I was to honestly do the business ( I had pedigreed seed I could have shipped at no-cost). And Earl... was goading me and pushing me to ship it that way.

That is what is criminal... and worthy of telling any city person who has any business or moral sense of decency at all.... to dismantle this corrupt scheme that is doing exactly the same thing today... as it did in 1993-5 on fusarium infested wheat that was worth more in the US than top grade CDN milling wheat!

Nothing has changed... in 15 years the CWB is still as corrupt as it was back then!

[parsley]

Tom,

Conventional farmers seem quite satisfied with the arrangement the CWB has made with organics so I assume that conventional growers are pleased with the "size" of the buyback they are required to pay.

As long as it remains hefty, the status quo will be acceptable.

cotton, I liked the way you tuned your humor tonight. It made me laugh out loud.

[TOM4CWB]

Parsley,

I too thought C.P. must have found some chocolate easter eggs in his nest!

(; grin... you tooo Mel... When does Charlie get back?

[checking]

Obviously copyrighted material should have been removed; and the poster warned as to why it was inappropriate in the first place. Any appropriate links could have been included by the poster. It was inconsiderate of the poster to pass off another person's opinion in the way it was done.
As soon as I saw this now censored post; it just didn't look right. didn'tcase

[wilagro]

In the past, I have posted copyrighted material, "with permission" from the author. That is what is missing here.

It is not illegal to quote pertinent sections of copyrighted articles, but not the article in total (as a rule).

The posting "with permission", had better be legitimate in all cases.

[parsley]

Most writers are pleased if their efforts are sourced and quoted. Why publish if you want to keep it secret?

The commentators worth their salt will never say a word about their material being quoted as long as they are CREDITED with the words quoted.

Some people are willing to pay for words they want to read.

Most reporters writing commentaries, and newspaper articles have been hired and already paid.

Quoting is made easier if a writer wants people to read his/her message, and people want to read it.

Parsley

[Fransisco]

It is interesting to note whose "copyrighted" material we are talking about here.

Paul Beingessner

What is interesting is that Paul is vigorously enforcing(policing?)his copyrights. Which is the right to the product of his effort, in this case his written work.

However he does not believe that the average grain farmer in Western Canada has the right to the product of their own effort when it comes to wheat and barley. His article argued that when you give farmers this same right, that he himself enjoys, they will make the wrong decision.

Again, what we have here is an anti-choice advocate who along with the likes of Stewart Wells and Rod Flaman believe that you should do as they say not as they do.