“in free enterprise everyone on both sides is a price taker as determined by many transactions, not set by one or two or three big players working together. the two sides of the market are balanced.”
What you are describing is “perfect competition” which is far more likely to exist in a capitalist democracy.
Where few players have an ability to influence prices through collusion you have what’s called an oligopoly, or worse, one player who controls the market - monopoly. Good anti-combines legislation is required to reduce this ability to abuse market power.
So the opposite of perfect competition is what we have in the designated area - a monopoly buyer who can dictate any price to the trapped sellers of wheat and barley in western Canada.
What you are describing is “perfect competition” which is far more likely to exist in a capitalist democracy.
Where few players have an ability to influence prices through collusion you have what’s called an oligopoly, or worse, one player who controls the market - monopoly. Good anti-combines legislation is required to reduce this ability to abuse market power.
So the opposite of perfect competition is what we have in the designated area - a monopoly buyer who can dictate any price to the trapped sellers of wheat and barley in western Canada.
Comment