• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Dictators' Roman Holiday

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    The Dictators' Roman Holiday

    The Dictators' Roman Holiday
    .
    In a display of arrogance and hypocrisy that was outrageous even for the United Nations, UN food development officials last week accused the United States of raising global food prices by subsidizing ethanol production.
    Actually, the outrage began even earlier.
    Only the United Nations would invite a dictator who has purposefully starved his own people to a summit on the international food crisis. But that is precisely what happened in Rome last week. Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe, who has starved his political enemies and channeled food aid to only favored groups, was in attendance, as was the Iranian dictator, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. It has already been one year since the U.S. Congress voted 411-2 to call on the UN Security Council to punish Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for violating the UN Charter and the UN Convention on Genocide for his repeated incitement of genocide against the Israeli people, yet the Iranian dictator is still welcome at UN events.
    True to form, Ahmadinejad used the international spotlight to once again predict the demise of the state of Israel and accuse the U.S. of plotting an attack on him.
    Mugabe accused the West, not his own genocidal policies, of starving his people.
    In other words, it was a typical gathering for the United Nations.
    Europe's Resistance to GM Foods, Not America's Support for Biofuels, Has Contributed to the Global Food Crisis
    But the infuriating arrogance of UN bureaucrats lecturing the world's largest provider of food aid - and the single greatest contributor to the UN food fund - cannot be allowed to pass without comment.
    In fact, it is the Europeans irrational resistance to genetically modified (GM) crops - aided and abetted by extremists on the left -- that is responsible for much of the hunger in Africa and the rest of the developing world.
    GM crops that are commonplace in the U.S. - crops that don't need expensive pesticides and even potentially are drought resistance - are banned in Europe. And Europe and the Left's misinformation about the health and safety of these foods has led most African nations to ban them too for fear of being shut out of lucrative European export markets.
    South Africa is the only African nation that grows GM crops. And while food production in the rest of Africa is 20 percent per capita less than it was in 1970, South Africa is producing surplus amounts of crops through biotechnology.
    The U.S. Should Refuse to Participate in Future UN Charades
    The UN food crisis gathering ignored the issue of GM foods, of course, but it did call on member nations to kick in at least $20 billion a year to help ease global hunger.
    President Bush, who has tripled U.S. aid to Africa during his presidency, should ignore this demand and publicly refuse to participate in farces with vicious, murdering thugs like Mugabe and Ahmadinejad like the one in Rome last week.
    President Bush should transition U.S. assistance to direct, bilateral forms only. Our willingness to allow UN bureaucrats and international dictators to lecture us in public strengthens them and isolates us. Far from feeding hungry people, it consigns them to lives of poverty, desperation and premature death.
    For their good, and for our national self-respect, we should stop being a part this charade.
    Your friend,

    Newt Gingrich

    #2
    Right on Newt.

    Comment


      #3
      ivbinconned: Since you like to read, there is a site that might be of interest to you. It has many articles of interest to today's progressive farmer. Just 'Google' Food First. it is the first listing. Food First Organization has been active for nearly fifty years and I have one of their first books entitled "Food First" (since revised).

      There is a very interesting article on production of alcohol from corn.

      http://www.foodfirst.org/files/PB%2014%20Agrofuels%20Trojan%20Horse%20-%20pdf.pdf

      Comment


        #4
        Thanks wilagro, I have book marked the site. Don't get much time to read these days...trying to keep the steers fed on this dried up place!!

        Comment


          #5
          From Wilagro’s link: “The economic function of these foreign genetic traits is not to decrease chemical use, but to increase market dominance and control over the agro-input industry by the corporations holding the patents.”

          I disagree, there may be market dominance by the corporation who invented the patent, but that is a natural result of owning the rights to a good idea that reduces pesticide use.
          The author has a “hate” on for corporations so they attack their property as being bad. If there is nothing scientifically or morally wrong with GMOs and they provide the benefit of lowering pesticide use, they should be promoted, not banned.

          The bigger problem, in my opinion, is with the patent laws that protect the use of the traits. I’m all for a company being able to recoup the investment in the research that goes into developing a new beneficial trait. Innovation is extremely expensive and we need to reward, not stifle it. But, the patent time limit (17 years?) needs to be more well defined to limit the ability to keep competitors out by using (abusing?) copyright laws to protect the data package for any new patent, which can effectively extend patent protection forever.

          Comment

          • Reply to this Thread
          • Return to Topic List
          Working...