CWB has to go

[haveapulse]

Trade Incentives: buyers often reward key persons with gifts in kind as an expressed interest in attaining a more mutually beneficial relationship.

Can't say it happens for sure in he Ivory Towers of the CWB , but in most other circumstances of trade and business it does.

Anyone come to mind?

[TOM4CWB]

katoe,

"Or perhaps the grain companies would tell us how they would or if they would handle grain for the cwb.,which would be their competion."

For the large majority of grain co's... the CWB IS the COMPETITION
N O W.

The Rest Of the World... does not have the CWB mucking around undercutting prices... Winter Wheat being the perfect example this year.

A very high quality crop... being sold at bone jarring LOW prices... and the worst basis in history.

As if we need a 'single desk' monopoly... to give our wheat away... C.P.!?

As you have mentioned 101 times... we are perfectly able to do our own 'give aways'... without the CWB throwing us in jail for trying to stop them from selling our produce at massive discounts... simply because they don't know what its value is in the FIRST PLACE!

It is about time the CWB became responsible to be accountable for the botched messes they make...

AS WELL...

The CWB SHOULD be recognised by folks... and appreciated if and when they do a good job and make great sales... but pooling even prevents this from happeneing... BECAUSE there is no accountability in the system... no transparency to force the accountability...

JUST one big mess.

If BUNGE or CARGILL wants to rip me off on my Canola... I don't sell to them.

With the CWB... I have NO CHOICE.

Having the RIGHT to say NO... should be a basic human right for everyone!

If Burbert, Agstar, Wilagro and C.P., enjoy fooling around with the CWB... so be it...

But I don't enjoy being ripped apart...and then having these folks [Burbert, Agstar, Wilagro and C.P.] tell me I am supposed to have enjoyed it ...

Noone should be forced into a relationship... especially when abuse of another human is the primary objective of the relationship... which IS the CASE with the CWB 'single desk' MOMOPOLY.

It is all about coveting and taking from some folks... to the benefit of others ...the Burberts, Agstars, Wilagros and C.P.'s of the world... that are lazy and don't want to do their required due diligence... and be responsible for their own mistakes!

[haveapulse]

The right to say no and to chose creates competition, and yes even if the competition is among a few players.
It is still choice.

Choice the foundation of a free society, as opposed to a communist society the government holds all or some of the rights of individuals.

TOM4 is right, the debate has nothing to do with money and everything to do with choice, and human rights; and the fact that the Government of Canada remains keepers of MY key as supported by the comrades who allow the CWB the ability to do so by their adulation.

The horror of collectivism is no different for us who abhor the CWB for the fact it takes away my basic human rights of choice as normally associated with a democratic capitalistic nation, than it was for those who escaped communist countries with barely the clothes on their backs.

Are the socialist do gooders who with clear conscience and a sense of entitlement own MY rights any different that those who drove the migrants of Communist Russia to Canada.

Dwarfed indeed by the human tragedy of the time, the sentiment to me it is one of the same.

[parsley]

"Anyone come to mind?"

Who comes to your mind?




The isssue is indeed about choice, and ownership and property rights.

This is the basic issue:

Do/should farmers in Western Canada have the right to sell what we grow?


Parsley

[haveapulse]

Just one? Does that mean I have to choose? :{