I understand there are a number of good "choice" candidates running for cwb director this year.
Without coming across as too skeptical, history has shown that elected "choice" directors have become some of the staunchest defenders of the single desk.
I suppose I could believe that once "inside" they we're provided with privileged information that causes a deep and profound change of heart and beliefs,
but since I matured beyond believing in fairy tales at around eight years old, I believe the reasons for switching sided lies elsewhere, by the way, that elsewhere rests in a very shady place.
So with farmers being burned in the past, I think each "choice" candidate running for director must;
#1; pledge to remain true to his stated beliefs in the free market for wheat and barley,
#2;he or she must pledge to support only those initiatives that prepare or position the cwb to function within an open market,
#3; they pledge to resist any changes that are designed to strengthen the single desk,
#4; they pledge to adopt a policy of immediately granting zero buyback export licenses to any farmer that requests one (should the open market supporters form a majority)
#5; they pledge to resign should the break any of the above four pledges.
This would go a long way to giving farmers like myself confidence that cwb director election are something I should give a damn about and that my vote does matter.
Agree or Diagree?
AdamSmith
Without coming across as too skeptical, history has shown that elected "choice" directors have become some of the staunchest defenders of the single desk.
I suppose I could believe that once "inside" they we're provided with privileged information that causes a deep and profound change of heart and beliefs,
but since I matured beyond believing in fairy tales at around eight years old, I believe the reasons for switching sided lies elsewhere, by the way, that elsewhere rests in a very shady place.
So with farmers being burned in the past, I think each "choice" candidate running for director must;
#1; pledge to remain true to his stated beliefs in the free market for wheat and barley,
#2;he or she must pledge to support only those initiatives that prepare or position the cwb to function within an open market,
#3; they pledge to resist any changes that are designed to strengthen the single desk,
#4; they pledge to adopt a policy of immediately granting zero buyback export licenses to any farmer that requests one (should the open market supporters form a majority)
#5; they pledge to resign should the break any of the above four pledges.
This would go a long way to giving farmers like myself confidence that cwb director election are something I should give a damn about and that my vote does matter.
Agree or Diagree?
AdamSmith
Comment