It looks like Friends of Socialism is headed for the courtroom once again. This time, it seems that logical arguments and common sense have been thrown completely out the window.
"In a release Wednesday, the group Friends of the CWB said it plans to argue in court that the federal government's recent amendment to regulations on the election of CWB directors "was enacted in an improper manner and that it violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.""
"Winnipeg lawyer Anders Bruun, representing Friends of the CWB, said the regulatory amendment "pits farmer candidates, who are subject to a $15,000 election spending cap, against third parties who are now permitted to spend unlimited amounts of money without accountability to farmers.""
If anything, imposing spending limits in the first place is a violation of freedom of expression, not the other way around. How they came to the opposite conclusion is beyond me.
"In a release Wednesday, the group Friends of the CWB said it plans to argue in court that the federal government's recent amendment to regulations on the election of CWB directors "was enacted in an improper manner and that it violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.""
"Winnipeg lawyer Anders Bruun, representing Friends of the CWB, said the regulatory amendment "pits farmer candidates, who are subject to a $15,000 election spending cap, against third parties who are now permitted to spend unlimited amounts of money without accountability to farmers.""
If anything, imposing spending limits in the first place is a violation of freedom of expression, not the other way around. How they came to the opposite conclusion is beyond me.
Comment