Will note the CWB has withdrawn the EPO offerings for Feed Wheat (Oct. 9), Soft White Spring (Oct. 10). They have only offered the 100 % EPO on CPS, CWRW and CWES since Oct. 10. The higher costs reflect the drop in market prices, higher volatility and an October PRO that is likely to decline $20 to $30/tonne. The reason from a visual side is you would almost have to pay the CWB on delivery if you used the EPO today.
When the market has dropped like a stone in water, why hasn't the CWB redone the PRO? The once a month is misleading to farmers and makes the EPO process almost totally irrelevant.
I could go on a big rant but won't. The new world of producer pricing options puts increased pressures on the CWB to provide better market signals and risk management products. Putting 100 % of effort into protecting single desk and operating expensive/ineffective risk management products to protect pooling accounts with 100 % download of costs on farmers who use them is inexcuseable.
And all this after they sent in a request for an increase in initial payments. If there is room for an adjustment payment, then there should be room for lower cost EPOs.
When the market has dropped like a stone in water, why hasn't the CWB redone the PRO? The once a month is misleading to farmers and makes the EPO process almost totally irrelevant.
I could go on a big rant but won't. The new world of producer pricing options puts increased pressures on the CWB to provide better market signals and risk management products. Putting 100 % of effort into protecting single desk and operating expensive/ineffective risk management products to protect pooling accounts with 100 % download of costs on farmers who use them is inexcuseable.
And all this after they sent in a request for an increase in initial payments. If there is room for an adjustment payment, then there should be room for lower cost EPOs.
Comment