• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Another Commentary on the CWB's Recent Producer Meetings

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Another Commentary on the CWB's Recent Producer Meetings

    Emotions Aren’t Helpful in Grain
    Marketing Decisions, Nor in Debating
    Marketing Choice

    It’s long been said that emotions are a
    grain marketer’s worst enemy. Greed,
    fear and ego more than any other factors
    stand in the way of prudent decision-
    making when it comes to selling crops.

    For example, how often have you decided
    not to sell at an attractive price,
    because ‘it could go even higher?’ Or
    have you perhaps priced some grain right
    at the bottom of the range, because ‘it
    felt like the price would keep falling
    forever!’ Most farmers will also admit
    to putting too much stake in what their
    neighbours say they sold their crops at,
    then waiting for a price as good or
    better to come along simply to avoid
    feeling like they got beat.

    Compared to greed, fear and ego,
    indicators such as the margin the farm
    can lock in above its costs at current
    prices, an inverse in futures or a drop
    in export buying, provide much more
    logical and reliable reasons to make a
    sale. When emotions run high, it becomes
    very easy to ignore such basic math and
    market signals.

    Similarly, we are finding commercial
    market realities to be completely absent
    from the Canadian Wheat Board’s (CWB)
    position regarding the future without a
    monopoly. The meetings held across
    western Canada last week allowed pro-
    monopoly CWB Directors, staff and
    producers to vent their emotions, but
    unfortunately, most of these emotions
    are based on half-truths and
    misperceptions about what the CWB
    actually does.

    The farmers who support the CWB monopoly
    are feeling sad, and they are feeling
    scared. It’s OK to be sad and scared –
    this is a major change. But these
    producers seem to have confused what the
    CWB monopoly means, with what the
    Prairie pools did historically.

    Pool elevators provided a co-operative
    alternative in marketing grain; they
    were launched to empower producers who
    felt taken advantage of by the local
    privately-owned elevators. The pools
    bought all of the crops farmers offered
    them, merchandised them to the best of
    their abilities, and then returned
    dividends to producer-owners.

    The CWB provides price pooling, which is
    a viable risk management approach that
    will continue to be offered after the
    monopoly is ended. The CWB markets wheat
    and barley to end users, developing a
    reputation for good Canadian grain and a
    brand, which is similar to the work that
    Pulse Canada and the Canola Council do.

    Producers must recognize that there are
    many stages involved in marketing grain
    along the supply chain, and the CWB
    operates solely at the end of it. Furthermore, at this final stage, their
    efforts only cover 3 of the 15-20 grain,
    oilseed, pulse and special crops that
    are produced by farms in the designated
    area.

    If CWB supporters can’t be clear and
    realistic about what they’re feeling,
    nobody will be able to help them. The
    antics at last week’s producer meetings
    took them another big step towards
    losing their organization entirely. Just
    like how emotions can get in the way of
    good grain marketing decisions, all of
    this drama is only hurting the
    industry’s ability to envision a
    successful future.

    www.farmlinksolutions.ca

    #2
    Well said.

    Comment


      #3
      Brenda well said but I have said it before. The presend board will flush the cwb before they allow it to work in a dual market. Just so they can say I TOLD YOU THE CWB COULD NOT SURIVE IN A OPEN MARKET.

      Comment


        #4
        I have spoke to a few board supporters in the last
        couple of weeks who feel the need for something
        different than the status quo. I think the board is
        hurting itself by maintaining such a hard line. The
        directors have quit listening and started telling
        supporters that their stupid if they think there is
        anything else than single desk. Good strategy belittle
        your supporters.

        Comment


          #5
          There are none as blind as those who refuse to open their eyes.

          Now close your eyes.

          What you see with your eyes closed... is what Chairman Oberg and his lost troop... believe we must see!

          Blackness. Nothing. Fear. Intimidation. Being lost.

          Surprise!!!

          All these sad somber 8 BLIND CWB Director folks need to do... is open their eyes and look at the great opportunities stareing them right in the face!

          Comment


            #6
            Tom: The current Board of directors was NOT elected to carve out a NEW CWB, they were to guide it under the present mandate.

            On July 31 of 2012, the whole board should resign as their position will no longer be valid. The government has not planned ANYTHING for the future of the CWB although they are responsible for its operation through legislation. They are going to cut it loose with hopes that it will just disappear.

            The whole transition thing has not been spelled out yet but already I can see chaos because Ritz and company are more interested in the politics of the whole shebang instead of doing an adequate job of planning ahead. They are like the proverbial "ostrich" with their collective heads in the sand.

            Comment


              #7
              wilagro, it's clear you would prefer the
              CWB monopoly remain, but like you said
              it's gone as of July 31st.

              Would you really prefer for the government
              to decide all on their own what comes
              next? Don't you want to have a say in how
              the grain industry runs in the future?

              Comment


                #8
                Wilagro:

                I agree with you on the CWB BOD mandate being limited to the current organization.

                If they worked on creating the CWB’s replacement, they would not be failing at their fiduciary responsibility to the CWB. If the establishment of the new agency was a threat to the existence of the CWB, that would be different. But I think we all know that the future of the CWB is not a function of whether there is a replacement entity or not. Creating a new agency does not weaken the CWB in any way.

                I believe they could wear two hats – directors of the CWB and architects of the new agency. What a great position to be in. Knowing full well that the CWB is gone, to be asked to help design a new agency should be considered an honour and a responsibility to be taken seriously.

                Where they are failing as directors is in the “save the single desk” campaign, which is not helping the CWB maintain its position and reputation in the trade, locally or globally.

                I recently learned the CWB has not even talked to any of its customers about what is going on. No courtesy call, no “I don’t know where we are headed but will keep you posted”. Nothing. Nada.

                Was there an edict from the BOD to the staff saying “thou shalt not discuss”? If so, the BOD is working contrary to the interests of the CWB – even if you consider its short life expectancy.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Second line in last post should read:

                  BUT if they worked on creating the CWB’s replacement, they would not be failing at their fiduciary responsibility to the CWB.

                  Comment

                  • Reply to this Thread
                  • Return to Topic List
                  Working...