• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Idea for WGRF endowment fund.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Idea for WGRF endowment fund.

    http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?
    feature=youtube_gdata_player&v=l8Hr5GR9WBI
    &desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dl8Hr5GR9WBI
    %26feature%3Dyoutube_gdata_player

    Thinking of a use for some of the farmer money
    in WGRF endowment fund. Would tests like this
    be of use to your farm? Sort of a Nebraska
    tractor test for crop inputs.

    Some of us are always looking at how to better
    farm. Weather that's new technology or better
    uses of existing tech.

    Some things that are brought to market, are pretty
    shaky science some is great science, that is
    brought to market by "small" companies.

    This would not be a government program for
    registration but more of an independent tester.
    WGRF (farmer)money is private money.

    A reason I thought of WGRF was because I feel it
    needs a new role to compliment varietal
    development, and it needs to build profile. As well
    it's tougher leveraging govt dollars when farmers
    are sitting on this war chest.

    Looking for comments good, bad or indifferent
    before I take it to the executive committee and
    then board as a whole.


    First question. Is there a private company out
    there doing this already? I'm not talking about
    walking fields. I envision more of a testing leading
    to extension role.


    Thanks for your comments.
    Gerrid
    @gustgd

    #2
    What about test existing Chemicals to see if the active ingrediant is as advertized. Thinking Reglone , can't remember the last time it worked well I think it was 92 but that was a long time ago

    Comment


      #3
      Could also test some of our fertilizer or is 46 always 46 percent or is it 40 or 48? Is 11 51 got 51 percent phos or 30? Had a test strip that I would never believe on my canola this year that I could actually grow the same amount of canola yield from no sulpher. An 80 acre oops test strip showed that my sulfer was useless this year, so is this why my whole canola crop was useless and did not cabbage out???? Cause my sulfer had nothing in it?

      Comment


        #4
        Gerrid,

        In Alberta we have Research groups that are third party that do this kind of testing. Canola Council of Canada does some work... not as local as many think needed. Will be interesting to see how the new wheat commission works these tests out!

        Cheers!

        Comment


          #5
          We need a team of lawyers fighting giant
          conglomerate companies on price fixing and gouging.

          Calculate the return on capital of that.

          Comment


            #6
            Development of a perennial wheat. Parsley

            Comment

            • Reply to this Thread
            • Return to Topic List
            Working...