• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Alberta Has it figured out! Oats vs Canola! less risk with oats.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Alberta Has it figured out! Oats vs Canola! less risk with oats.

    ALBERTA: Cost of Production Helps
    Identify Business Strengths - A simple
    example using AgriProfit$ data from
    Alberta's grey-wooded soil zone (2008-
    10) demonstrates the importance of
    knowing the cost of production and
    related information. Regional average
    gross revenues for canola and oats were
    $446 and $310 per acre, respec-tively.
    If price and yield are the choice
    criteria, then there will be a lot of
    canola grown in this region. However,
    once the cost of production is
    introduced into this example with canola
    averaging $321 per acre and an average
    oat crop $191 per acre. First off, the
    cost of canola looks daunting at about
    70 per cent higher, but net profit works
    out to $125 per acre. And comparably the
    net profit for oats works out to $119
    per acre. If net returns are the choice
    crite-ria, then canola still has the
    advantage, although it's not as large as
    many first perceive. "Higher costs of
    production typically increase cash
    risk," says Wood. "In this example,
    there is significantly more cash at risk
    with the canola crop, in a worst case
    scenario, production costs average about
    $130 more per acre.
    So if Seed for Canola and Spray and Fert
    go up were approaching a money loosing
    crop for Canola!

    #2
    How about this version?

    http://www.producer.com/2012/09/producers-
    squeeze-greater-profits-from-pasture/

    Comment

    • Reply to this Thread
    • Return to Topic List
    Working...