OK lets all put money in for the FNA seed capital

[HappyFarmer]

If they told you 187 bucks a ton on 46 they are full
of shit! Great way to suck people in!

[groundspeed]

If we sit on our ass and do nothing we will never have any competition in fertilizer to bring the prices down. Im willing to give some money and take the chance.

[SASKFARMER3]

That's my point. If we sit and do nothing we
deserve to get screwed. If I loose a 110000 in
five years oh well I might also gain. I remember
one little deposit in a terminal that gave me back
close to 100000. If you do nothing nothing will
change. Some times you loose sometimes you
win.

[HappyFarmer]

So are they saying that based on projected profits
and on the number of shares you buy it would
equate to 187/mt on the amount of N you use on
your farm?

[SASKFARMER3]

After I get lithe documents ill post!

[cottonpicken]

Great idea,i'm in.

[wd9]

You do realize you're giving money to FNA?

[Hopperbin]

thinking most here need to get their heads out of their asses. There is a guy from FNA working on this project that is no longer actually getting paid by FNA I think as some sort of legal issue with the formation of a fertiler plant. The seed money that anyone puts up is for research, studies and what ever needs to be done to get the project to the cost to build and ask for more investment money stage. FNA will have no capital or investment in the project. All statements are forward looking and can change. One thing for sure if you think the fertilizer companies are not charging excessive amounts for N then keep you head in your ass. There is not much of any structure here just a bunch of rag tag farmers here say is industry players are phoning up and wanting in, and nothing to put out in the news as most anything that can be said can be used by another industry player to stop the project. Other than they are a lot further ahead than they can tell us is all anyone will know for the time being and for a while in my opinion. There may be some surprises here. One or ten thousand for something like this is peanuts. Also FNA is toast in my books if their man screws this up and they know it.

[Hopperbin]

Sask it is my view that our suppliers are paying much more for product than they need to because of N being priced at the USA gulf and increases as we are further north as we have no immediate access to off shore fertilizer, a farmer's plant will change that. Fertilizer could be 300 per ton less, the exact number is not out there. Or the manufacturing cost could be 40 cents per lb delivered to farm, no one knows exactly and why bitch about 10 cents. Yet 10 cents in N is an expence of 10,000 dollars for my farm. The plant in my opinion will have to be run like a business and pay dividends according to the shares owned and some incentive for farmers to be in to guarrantee an amount of production. Charlie it would have to be a combination of farmer guarantee ownership and delivery and corporate dividends. If it was no fert. cost saving and all corporate dividend then that would still be ok with me, this is all open and the seed money shareholders will be the ones to vote in my opinion then again this is my opinion as any statement is forward looking and can and or will change.

[cottonpicken]

****in A -Hopper,please,please note we need this
near a co2 source,rally the flag and get everyone in
and slit the throats of the non-believers .