• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Conservative Crockatt wins with hard work!

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Conservative Crockatt wins with hard work!

    Door-knocking pays off for Crockatt in byelection
    MP designate for Calgary Centre to focus on economy
    By Kelly Cryderman, Calgary Herald, November 28,
    2012

    CALGARY — Despite the criticism of her byelection
    campaign, MP designate Joan Crockatt says she won
    Monday’s Calgary Centre vote through hard work and
    by sticking to a strategy of meeting voters face-to-
    face at their homes. In fact, the Conservative winner of
    Monday’s federal contest wore out two pairs of shoes
    and two pairs of winter boots trudging down Calgary’s
    inner-city sidewalks for the campaign. “We really made
    a cornerstone of the campaign door-knocking every
    available minute we had,” Crockatt, 56, said in an
    interview on Tuesday.
    The Conservative party focus on direct interactions
    with voters — instead of attending all candidates’
    forums or granting an array of media requests — has
    worked in many recent federal byelections and in
    Calgary Centre, the strategy helped give the Tories and
    Crockatt the edge. “My background is media. I love
    media, and I would have done all the media in the
    world — but that simply wasn’t the campaign
    strategy,” said Crockatt, a former Herald editor,
    political commentator and communications consultant.
    Crockatt won the federal byelection with 37 per cent of
    the popular vote while her closest rival, Liberal Harvey
    Locke, was second with 33 per cent. Chris Turner of
    the Green party finished third with 26 per cent of the
    vote. But political observers say even though Crockatt
    came out ahead, the former journalist has more work
    to do to show she can represent a politically diverse
    constituency where most of the people who cast a
    byelection ballot voted for someone else.
    Crockatt was criticized throughout her run for not
    attending every byelection debate and not doing a
    number of media interviews. Mount Royal University
    political scientist Lori Williams said Crockatt’s
    campaign has given some people the perception she
    wants to avoid those who disagree with her or ask
    tough questions. She now has to find a way of relating
    with people who voted Liberal, Green or NDP, and the
    large number who didn’t vote at all. “Calgary Centre is
    not Calgary West,” Williams said. “If she doesn’t reach
    out to some of the people that she clearly didn’t
    connect with in this campaign, she may be facing a
    challenge in the future.”
    Throughout the campaign, Crockatt said her goals
    were to keep the government’s sights on the economy,
    and to explain to other Canadians that the oilsands are
    being developed in an environmentally responsible
    manner. That singular focus on economic issues is a
    concern to Locke, who said Tuesday he’s still worried
    Calgary is getting short shrift in terms of arts and
    infrastructure funding from Ottawa because the city
    always votes Conservative. “She will be exactly the MP
    she promised she would be. She’ll focus on the
    economy. And she’ll focus on being a Stephen Harper
    loyalist,” he said.
    Another issue that continues to challenge Crockatt is
    the split between provincial Progressive Conservatives
    and their more right-of-centre cousins, Wildrose party
    supporters. In the byelection, a number of more
    “progressive” conservatives supported Locke or Turner.
    “There was probably a little bit of that at play,”
    acknowledged Ian Todd, a Crockatt supporter and a
    former executive assistant to Preston Manning, when
    he was the Reform party leader. “I have good friends
    that are provincial Conservatives that were involved in
    Harvey’s campaign,” Todd said, adding “in the end, she
    pulled it off. That’s what counts.”
    Although Mayor Naheed Nenshi called Crockatt out for
    not attending a debate that his office helped organize
    on municipal issues earlier this month, he said
    Tuesday that she will be a great MP. “She’s obviously
    extremely intelligent. She’s really well-versed on
    issues of policy,” Nenshi said. “And she’s been saying
    for the last couple of weeks that she’s going to fight
    hard for Calgary and that’s really all we can ask.”
    Crockatt spent Tuesday doing media interviews and
    was scheduled to fly to Ottawa on an evening flight so
    she could attend caucus today. She has yet to be
    sworn in as a member of Parliament. But speaking the
    day after her win, Crockatt said her prolific door-
    knocking at more than 16,000 households is proof the
    Harper Conservatives are not taking Calgary Centre for
    granted. “Voters sort of heard from the media, ‘Well,
    the Tories just expect to win this. It’s a cakewalk for
    them,’” Crockatt said. “I didn’t take that attitude at all,
    and neither did my campaign team.”

    #2
    Tom - let's have a close look at this: less than 30%
    voter turnout. Wins with 37% of popular support
    among voters, beats Harvey Locke by 4% points (
    who received strong support not because he is
    Liberal, but because he is Harvey Locke - locally
    very respected). 37% of 30% voter turnout
    represents support of about 1.3 out of every 10
    eligible voters. Almost two thirds of those who
    voted cast their ballots against her. You call this 1st
    past the poll crap democracy? Why didn't the other
    70% bother to vote. BECAUSE they don't feel their
    votes matter, have value or count. How do we fix
    this? (Hint - to be elected to the old CWB Board you
    needed 50% 1= preferential ballot). BTW, a win in
    Calgary for the CPC with a 37% endorsement is not
    a win. Like Don Braid in the same issue of the
    Herald said - "the door to Harper's Cabinet has had
    a large sheet of plywood nailed over it as far as
    Crockatt is concerned".

    Comment


      #3
      rockpile I'll try to answer some of your questions.

      Q-"You call this 1st past the poll crap democracy?"
      A-Yes it has been used by the most powerful democratic nations in the world for centuries.

      Q- "Why didn't the other 70% bother to vote"
      A- They obviously though the other 30% were more qualified to make the choice for them. (the fools)

      Q-"How do we fix this?"
      A-That depends if the party you vote for has any hope of achieving government in alternative systems. Changing systems, means playing politics too. It seems only those on the outside want the rules changed (but only if it favours them of-course).

      Rockpile. I take umbrage with any statement that goes like this," ya but X percent of voters voted against the candidate." It is a false conclusion. In our system no one votes against a candidate. I make my mark for someone, not against the others. He/She with the most yeas, wins. I like it that way.

      Comment


        #4
        ColeH2S,
        Pay attention! You are obviously not from Alberta.
        1st past the post is universal - not. Try to
        understand the US system of the electoral college,
        or how they elect governments in Germany, France
        and Australia. It is not first past the post in these
        countries and in several other democratic nations
        around the world.
        Did non voters leave it up to more engaged voters?
        Seriously, people are disengaged and with good
        reason. THEY are bullied! As far as your assertion
        that a different approach is biased by one's political
        persuasion - you're nuts. This could work just as
        well for a Lib, a Dipper or a Con - location, location,
        location! But I bet it would open the door to a lot of
        highly qualified independents who would really go
        out of their way to represent their constituents -
        something totally absent now! I am simply looking
        for a more meaningful way to get Citizens engaged
        in the Democratic process before we LOSE IT! As far
        as voting for or against, let me again state you are
        not from Alberta because in last spring's election, I
        sure the hell did vote against the PC status quo and
        chose the candidate with the most likely chance of
        deposing the incumbent, whether I agreed with
        party platform or not, and this time I won -hurrah -
        and have a good guy with the WR representing me.
        So stuff your assumptions and go cheer your team -
        rah! rah! while the rest of us consider how to
        modernize the democratic process in the Intel age
        and introduce the evolution of a new Democratic
        process. Cheers.

        Comment


          #5
          OMG...If you are an adult in Canada and do not vote because of being bullied..GROW UP. People around the world trying to get the right to vote are being killed...now that's a bully. Preferential balloting is as useless as the "concensus" concept of the 90's. This concept has led to the greatest void in leadership that I have ever seen. Consensus led us to today's problems, true leadership is required to get us out of this mess.

          Comment


            #6
            It's called vote splitting. And the
            people who get elected like it that way
            because in a three party system it is
            most likely how they got elected.

            Comment


              #7
              Most times it is 4-way: NDP, Liberal, Green and
              Conservatives, And then add the Independents
              and the Communist Party and othe various
              oddball parties.

              Everyone gets to be part of the action. Is that vote
              splitting, or is it encouraging lots of voices? Pars

              Comment


                #8
                Rocky,

                We had our Policy and Constitution Congress in
                Alberta this weekend. Joan did a great job... we
                knocked on 16,000 doors in Calgary Centre.
                Conservative folks are complacent and used to easy
                wins... so often do not vote in by-elections.

                We must truthfully thank Justin and Maginty for the
                liberals loss.



                Have a look at this...

                Trudeau under fire for long-gun registry comments
                By Susana Mas, CBC News Posted: Dec 2, 2012 10:10
                PM ET Last Updated: Dec 2, 2012 11:14 PM ET Read 46

                "Liberal leadership hopeful Justin Trudeau has touched
                off a political uproar after saying that the federal long-
                gun registry was 'a failure' when he previously
                defended it and even voted to keep it. (Andrew
                Vaughan/Canadian Press)

                Trudeau calls long-gun registry 'a failure'
                AUDIO | Listen to CBC Radio's The House in-depth
                interview with Justin Trudeau
                Trudeau admits comments may have affected Calgary
                byelection
                The federal Conservatives and Opposition New
                Democrats are calling out Liberal leadership hopeful
                Justin Trudeau for saying that the long-gun registry
                was "a failure," after he spent years defending it and
                voted not to abolish it as recently as a few months
                ago.

                "The long-gun registry, as it was, was a failure and I'm
                not going to resuscitate that," Trudeau said during a
                campaign stop in the Conservative riding of Glengarry–
                Prescott–Russell in Ontario on Friday.

                "We will continue to look at ways of keeping our cities
                safe and making sure that we do address the concerns
                around domestic violence that happen right across the
                country, in rural as well as urban areas in which,
                unfortunately, guns do play a role.

                "But there are better ways of keeping us safe than that
                registry which is, has been removed," Trudeau said in a
                question-and-answer session while visiting the DART
                Aerospace plant in Hawkesbury.

                In an interview with CBC News on Sunday, Conservative
                MP Pierre Poilievre said Trudeau is pandering to
                different groups depending on what part of the
                country he finds himself in.

                "When he's in Quebec he says Albertans have too much
                power, but when he's in Alberta he says the opposite.
                When he's with his Liberal friends he votes in favour of
                the long-gun registry, when he's in a rural community
                he calls it a failure.

                "Justin Trudeau will tell you whatever he thinks you
                want to hear, whenever he thinks you want to hear it,"
                Poilievre said.

                Trudeau recently set off another political firestorm
                when comments he made about Albertans in a 2010
                French interview resurfaced in the media.

                The leadership hopeful offered an apology but
                maintained his comments were being misinterpreted
                and that they were directed at the government of
                Prime Minister Stephen Harper and not Albertans in
                general.

                He later conceded his 2010 comments "may have
                hindered a little bit" his party's chances in the Calgary
                Centre byelection last Monday.

                NDP would restore long-gun registry
                The Conservatives abolished the long-gun registry in
                April after passing Bill C-19, An Act to Amend the
                Criminal Code and the Firearms Act, in a final vote of
                159-130. Trudeau voted against the Conservative bill.

                While the Liberals have since said they would not bring
                back the registry, NDP Leader Tom Mulcair has
                pledged to restore it.

                NDP justice critic Françoise Boivin, in an interview with
                CBC News on Sunday, said her jaw dropped when she
                read Trudeau's comments.

                Like Poilievre, Boivin too wondered whether Trudeau
                would repeat those comments in Montreal or Toronto,
                cities that have been marked by gun violence over the
                years.

                Boivin noted it wasn't that long ago that Trudeau voted
                against Bill C-19, "and to say a few months later that it
                was a failure, that it was not doing at all what it should
                be doing... maybe the attraction to try to lure some
                voters on his side and bring back the Liberal Party in
                that area was stronger than his principles."

                "Real leadership is to say to a bunch of people that you
                know are against your view and try to explain it and
                convince them. That's what real leadership is suppose
                to be," Boivin said.

                The New Democratic MP from Quebec also took aim at
                Trudeau's assertion that gun ownership is an
                "important facet of Canadian identity." Boivin said
                Canada is not the United States, where the right to
                bear arms is entrenched in the constitution.

                When asked for reaction to Trudeau's comments,
                journalist Rob Russo, Ottawa Bureau Chief for The
                Canadian Press, told CBC Radio's The House that
                Trudeau was "boldly going where no Grit has gone
                before."

                "He is taking on an issue where he is going to get into
                some trouble in the province of Quebec. If there was
                one province where the gun registry was an
                unqualified hit, a success, it is in the province of
                Quebec," Russo told host Evan Solomon.

                Since the long-gun registry was scrapped, the Quebec
                government has gone to court and won the right to
                preserve its share of the long-gun data.

                The federal government has since destroyed most of
                the remaining records of registered long guns and is
                currently appealing the Quebec Superior Court ruling
                blocking it from destroying the data from Quebec.

                The federal long-gun registry was first created by the
                Liberal Party in 1995, in the wake of the Dec. 6, 1989,
                massacre at Montreal's École Polytechnique, in which
                14 women were singled out for their gender and killed
                by a gunman.

                Ceremonies to mark the National Day of Remembrance
                and Action on Violence Against Women are held every
                Dec. 6 in Montreal and in other cities across the
                country."

                Comment

                • Reply to this Thread
                • Return to Topic List
                Working...