This is such a kick in the bag it makes me feel like calling up the Chinese and selling my land directly to them. Letting them work it, harvest it, and ship every kernel back to China. I know they won't be worried about feeding the world! F*ck the U.N. and all the rest of the gov'ts who are so damn worried about taking the spikes out of grain markets. Once again, they are pleased with themselves about smoothing out the upward spikes in grain markets. I believe they were hard at work tamping down wheat prices during that 8-9 month period, where the futures market went sideways, even though there was bullish news. Here's a section from the story,
Winners and LOSERS
Governments deserve applause for, by and large, keeping their heads this time.
Sure, it is a little grating to hand out plaudits to authorities for acting as decency dictates, in avoiding the knee-jerk reaction to meet crop squeeze with stockpiling.
But it would also be churlish not to praise, say, Russian officials for keeping their exports open, despite a wheat crop even worse than in 2010, when a poor harvest sparked an 11-month ban on shipments.
The decision has brought benefits to consumers worldwide, through avoiding an upward price spiral, besides ultimately in Russian agriculture itself, through improving its appeal to agriculture.
The losers are crop bulls who lost out on that extra crop price premium, which may continue to elude them if authorities keep putting the broader good before short-term selfish impulses.
Ironically, a year marked by crop disasters has given huge hope to the cause of feeding the world, affordably.
<a href="http://www.agrimoney.com/feature/why-didnt-cop-prices-go-even-higher-in-2012--186.html"target=blank>Why didn't crop prices go even higher</a>
We need the up spikes to survive the dips, drops and spikes down. You can be damn sure they won't be concerned when prices spike to the downside, more likely, they'll be happier still.
This relates back to a post I made now dated Nov 16th titled <a href="https://www.agriville.com/cgi-bin/forums/viewThread.cgi?1352872733"target=blank>Distorting Havest Data #2</a>
There's a hot link in that post about the story from the U.N., for those that haven't read it.
Winners and LOSERS
Governments deserve applause for, by and large, keeping their heads this time.
Sure, it is a little grating to hand out plaudits to authorities for acting as decency dictates, in avoiding the knee-jerk reaction to meet crop squeeze with stockpiling.
But it would also be churlish not to praise, say, Russian officials for keeping their exports open, despite a wheat crop even worse than in 2010, when a poor harvest sparked an 11-month ban on shipments.
The decision has brought benefits to consumers worldwide, through avoiding an upward price spiral, besides ultimately in Russian agriculture itself, through improving its appeal to agriculture.
The losers are crop bulls who lost out on that extra crop price premium, which may continue to elude them if authorities keep putting the broader good before short-term selfish impulses.
Ironically, a year marked by crop disasters has given huge hope to the cause of feeding the world, affordably.
<a href="http://www.agrimoney.com/feature/why-didnt-cop-prices-go-even-higher-in-2012--186.html"target=blank>Why didn't crop prices go even higher</a>
We need the up spikes to survive the dips, drops and spikes down. You can be damn sure they won't be concerned when prices spike to the downside, more likely, they'll be happier still.
This relates back to a post I made now dated Nov 16th titled <a href="https://www.agriville.com/cgi-bin/forums/viewThread.cgi?1352872733"target=blank>Distorting Havest Data #2</a>
There's a hot link in that post about the story from the U.N., for those that haven't read it.
Comment