• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lisa Raitt's lack of interest questioned

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Lisa Raitt's lack of interest questioned

    Western farmers hit by grain backlog blame Raitt at Ottawa meeting

    By Kelsey Johnson | Feb 27, 2014 6:53 pm | | 0 Comments


    Federal Transport Minister Lisa Raitt is facing heightened criticism over her public silence on a grain crisis that has left millions of tonnes of grain stranded across the Prairies for nearly five months.

    Farm groups and both opposition parties laid into the minister during the annual Canadian Federation of Agriculture (CFA) meeting, which wrapped up in Ottawa Thursday.

    The minister’s non-involvement is of utmost concern, Lynn Jacobsen, president of the Alberta Federation of Agriculture, said in introducing a question for NDP agriculture critic Malcolm Allen Wednesday.

    “She’s fairly silent on a lot of this stuff and we need to have some assurance out of the transport department because my experience has always been that Transport has always been very railroad-friendly,” Jacobsen explained.



    Allen noted that other potential economic crises have elicited a stronger response from Raitt.

    “If the minister of labour, who is now the minister of transport, basically told Air Canada workers you can’t go on strike because it will threaten the Canadian economy… the bottom line is that we are now talking about the real economy that is stagnating,” Allen said.

    “When you have a crisis, you deal with it immediately and you act,” he added.

    Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau joined in the chorus demanding the transport minister step up her game.

    “We need a transport minister who’s going to stand up and tell the railways to get this done,” he told attendees.

    “The fact that we’re not shipping things means that we’re idling our locomotives and leasing them to the United States to get [grain] to the American ports is an absurdity of ridiculous proportions,” he added.

    “For me, it’s something that should be dealt with fairly straight forwardly with a transport minister who’s to actually step up and say ‘get your act together railroads and let’s start shipping our grain.’”

    Raitt was expected to attend the CFA’s reception Tuesday evening but never showed.

    However, the minister has held several meetings behind the scenes on the issue, iPolitics has learned. On Tuesday, the minister met with Canada Grains Council President Richard Philipps and other stakeholders.

    Two more meetings – including one with Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall, who’s in town for the annual Manning Networking Conference – were set for Thursday.

    Wall has been very vocal about the crisis unfolding in Western Canada, referring to it on Twitter as a “serious situation and a high priority.”

    He’s appointed a special cabinet committee to monitor the situation. The committee recently met with Canada’s two national railways – Canadian National (CN) and Canadian Pacific (CP Rail) – in Montreal to discuss the crisis.

    The Saskatchewan government has also asked the federal government to immediate oversee negotiations on performance agreements between grain and rail companies.

    Paralyzed grain across the prairies is dealing a devastating blow to the Western Canadian economy. Recent estimates from economists at the University of Saskatchewan estimate the delays could cost the agricultural industry between $2 billion and $4 billion.

    Last fall’s massive crop combined with frigid temperatures and a shortage of rail capacity has caused a logistical nightmare. The number of outstanding orders for grain cars now tops an unprecedented 55,000 cars. More than fifty ships are docked in West Coast ports waiting for grain, while a handful of feed and processing mills have run short.

    The backlog has also dealt a severe hit to farmer’s cash flow. Farmers aren’t paid until their grain is delivered to market, generally the local elevator. Plugged elevators, though, have forced farmers to store last harvest’s 95 million tonne crop on the farm, making it next to impossible to convert into cash.

    Multiple CFA meeting attendees told iPolitics farmers financial situations are getting more and more “critical” by the day, with many producers falling behind on bill, mortgage and loan payments.

    Farmers can apply for federal assistance of up to $400,000 (of which $100,000 is interest free) via the Advance Payment Program (APP). Producers are also being asked to use any and all funds tucked away in individual Agri-Invest accounts.

    Industry lenders, along with Alberta Agriculture Minister Verlyn Olson, however, have asked Ottawa to boost APP funding in light of the backlog.

    On Tuesday, Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz said the federal government was considering all options, including new regulations that would see the railways fined daily for poor service.

    All new rail regulations require the minister of transport’s approval.

    Both CN and CP have promised to supply 13,000 grain cars per week until December 2014 to ease the backlog once the cold weather breaks.

    Meanwhile, Ritz has ordered grain companies and railways to clear up any outstanding grain contracts by the end of March. Otherwise, the minister said Tuesday, producers will be able to start collecting interest.

    © 2014 iPolitics Inc.
    Email This Post




    Login | Signup
    0 Comments
    powered by:

    #2
    Well maybe silence is a better title but
    being since we can't edit posts on this
    ol cockshutt of a site......

    Comment


      #3
      Why wait un till the end of March We have contract that are way past 90 days overdue, don't want to cancel them they where still for a good price . Time for all of us in this situation to send a storage bill to the grain co.s. Then they can send it on to the railways where the fault lies.

      Comment


        #4
        "Meanwhile, Ritz has ordered grain companies and railways to clear up any outstanding grain contracts by the end of March. Otherwise, the minister said Tuesday, producers will be able to start collecting interest."
        Everyone be sure to demand the interest! What maybe 1%, 1/365% per day, oh joy! 100 T's wheat@ $6/bu x 1%= $220 per year, $0.60/day. That will really hurt the RR's.

        Comment


          #5
          The last cheque the railways wrote for overcharging farmers, took a couple years to get and it went to the WGRF any way.

          No chance the farmers are going to see any penalty money.

          Ritz just continues to talk.

          He has no plan. Or this wouldn't have become a crisis in the first place.

          He had the unload numbers, he had farmers calling him back in November. He chose to ignore any good advice he got.

          He is just a completely blind stupid man. No other words can describe a guy that couldn't correlate numbers.

          This isn't rocket science. You can do the math with a walmart calculator or the one on a smart phone.

          Comment


            #6
            Lisa Raitt was very fast with back to work legislation when Air Canada and CN rail were under threat of a labour dispute. The justification was impact on the economy. Would not the same justification apply to grain movement? Harper, Ritz, and Raitt are either incompetent or don't want piss off their railways on this issue. Are railways more important than farmers? Railways are too important to Canada's economy to be left on their own to decide what level of service they provide. If the railways are not interested in doing the job in a timely and competent manner at a reasonable and fair cost then the government should get involved and legislate. They should also open up the railways to competition with joint running rights.

            Comment


              #7
              chuckchuck

              I do live in a bizzarro world. First I agree with you.

              And second if the government can force workers back to work then they can tell management to move grain as well.

              Your points are bang on.


              For those of you that read this from the political side. Pay the **** attention, farmers are slowly uniting because this issue doesn't divide them, it unites them.

              Comment


                #8
                Who's going to enforce the penalties?
                That used to be in the scope of Asst
                Commissioners, But this gov't did away
                with that protection.

                In the Compas review and the last
                review I suggested that there should be
                3 Asst in Alberta 3 in Sask and 2 in
                Man. Looking after producers interests.
                They would have been nipping this in the
                butt all along and we would have had
                protocols in place to deal with this.

                Comment


                  #9
                  How to contact Lisa Raitt:
                  http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/minister/honourable-lisa-
                  raitt

                  Comment


                    #10
                    "Railways are too important to Canada's economy to be left on their own to decide what level of service they provide."

                    Careful. I've heard people say that same thing about farmers and food production. I want my product to move as much as the next guy, but I don't want the "Government" "helping" me with my business.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      The Government gave the railways the Monopoly in return they have a duty to provide service, that's why the government must act.No ifs ands or buts.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Slapshot. If you haul your grain on public roads, use tax reduced fuel on your farm, claim a GST refund, use crop insurance, received an excess moisture payment, received an Agristability payment, recieved a AgriInvest payment, then the government is already involved in your farm.

                        You can't have an economy lose billions of dollars and put farmers out of business because the railways are not doing their job!

                        In a truly competitive market, alternatives would have stepped up.
                        Since there is no competitive alternative to the railways the only choice is legislation.

                        It is a duopoloy and in many cases it is a monopoly. The market won't solve this problem because the country is too big and the distances are too far. The only solution is the regulation of good service and a fair return on investment for the railways.

                        You can't have a strong economy if you don't have good transportation policy.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          You are just scaring me now chuckchuck!

                          Been thinking this for a while now. Well put.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Bang on Chuck, well summarized." there is no competitive alternative to the railways", says it all. Transportation is lifeblood of this far flung country. It is obvious to farmers at this time. There simply is no export ag without guarantees set in STONE.
                            Slapshot, if farmers were refusing to produce enough to feed Canada we would deserve to be forced or removed.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              The rail beds should be owned and
                              operated by the Federal Government.
                              Just like the Trans Canada Highway. And
                              like the Trans Canada Highway, it should
                              be twinned. Thus is a matter of
                              national interest and should not be left
                              to the likes of Hunter Harrison.

                              The railroads can continue to own and
                              operate their rolling stock in
                              competition with anyone else that wants
                              to provide transportation services. In
                              other words, joint running rights.

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...