And It Starts

[tmyrfield]

Well if Your Anti Science (climate denier) then your right in there with Jenny Macarthy and the Ant- vaxxers and the anti go crowd. You Can't pick and choose the science you believe in for your convenience

Your smart enough ( I think) for you to do your Own search on climate papers.
BUT here's the catch please read the ones that been peer reviewed , they are legit. The NON peer reviewed is just an opinion

I prefer to think of myself as an anthropogenic climate change skeptic. using the word denier has a connotation that is no way helpful to the debate but is solely used to denigrate one side of the argument.

If you had bothered to look at the articles I linked you would see well heeled climatologists and researchers posting actual data and accepted theories as to what is happening to the earth. By ignoring them you are showing your total acceptance of climate change dogma.

Again please site just one peer reviewed paper that unequivocally shows the link that an increase of 20 ppm co2 over the past 50 years causes dangerous runaway global warming.
here is a study that shows anthropogenic co2 portion of the atmosphere hasn't changed for 150 years.
Since you were the one to insist on science and peer reviewed studies. I suspect you will ignore this link as well.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/10/bombshell-from-bristol-is-the-airborne-fraction-of-anthropogenic-co2-emissions-increasing-study-says-no/