Testy, testy. Don't get your tit in a knot, chuckChuck.
Here I was being civil with your old study because it would have taken two years to compile, evaluate, and then publish 1993 to 2005 data. It is old and out of date by anyone's standard (including Statistics Canada).
Go back to your bowl of sprouts, or answer my original query, properly, not some irrelevant study pulled out of your encylopedia.
Here I was being civil with your old study because it would have taken two years to compile, evaluate, and then publish 1993 to 2005 data. It is old and out of date by anyone's standard (including Statistics Canada).
Go back to your bowl of sprouts, or answer my original query, properly, not some irrelevant study pulled out of your encylopedia.
Comment