• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Canadian business leaders call for 'bold leadership' on carbon pricing

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Canadian business leaders call for 'bold leadership' on carbon pricing

    Canadian business leaders call for 'bold leadership' on carbon pricing

    Bruce Cheadle, The Canadian Press
    Energy

    Energy, The Canadian Press

    OTTAWA -- Canadian corporate executives whose companies together employ more than a million people are urging Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the premiers to press ahead with collective climate action, including putting a price on carbon emissions.

    An open letter to the first ministers was released Thursday morning ahead of a planned meeting early next month in Ottawa, where the federal Liberals hope to finalize a pan-Canadian plan with all the provinces and territories.

    "Canada has a history of taking far-sighted policy actions to capitalize on the opportunities created by global economic change," says the letter.
    "The time is right for the same kind of bold leadership."

    The 60-plus signatories include business leaders representing oil and gas, mining, forestry products, cement making, aluminium smelting, information technology, banking, grocery retail and building materials. Together, their businesses have revenues exceeding $300 billion annually.

    Through the Smart Prosperity Institute based out of the University of Ottawa, they've made common cause with clean energy associations, environmental advocacy groups, organized labour and environmental think tanks.

    Their common message is that enlightened self-interest dictates Canada strive to be at the front of the pack as the global economy makes a historic shift.

    That includes putting a price on CO2 -- "the most cost-effective way to reduce emissions, stimulate innovation and drive energy efficiency," says the two-page letter.

    Michael Crothers, the president of Shell Canada, said the open letter was conceived in September -- before the election of U.S. president-elect Donald Trump shook the climate policy world -- and is aimed less at the premiers than at fostering discussions with other industrial sectors across Canada.

    "I've had a few with peers in our (oil and gas) sector but also with other business leaders," Crothers said in an interview.

    "It really starts to help crystallize into the implementation phase what are some of the key issues that people are concerned about, and how can we address those."

    As the letter states, revenues from carbon taxes can be used to help vulnerable households but also to help "businesses to remain globally competitive while making the low carbon transition."

    That the signatories include the heads of the Aluminium Association of Canada and the Cement Association of Canada -- two sectors considered most vulnerable to energy costs and emissions reductions -- speaks volumes.

    Aluminum association president Jean Simard said Canada now has the lowest carbon footprint aluminum in the world, and competes mainly with China, which controls half of global production.

    The carbon intensity of aluminum production is down 60 per cent in Canada, while absolute emissions have fallen by quarter, Simard told The Canadian Press.

    "We think that now Canada has reached a point -- not only for our industry but other industrial sectors -- where we have to bring together a mix of policies, including carbon pricing on a national basis, in order to get Canada's economy as the best-in-class in the mid term," he said.

    It's a message that still has many detractors.

    Lisa Raitt, a former Conservative cabinet minister now contending for the federal party's leadership, rose in the House of Commons on Wednesday to decry Liberal climate policies, including a new national floor price on carbon "that will drive up the cost of everything and force business to lay off workers."

    Those concerns have only intensified since Canada's dominant trading partner elected a Republican president and Congress that are decidedly cool to the fight against global warming.

    Simard suggested factors such as the strength of the U.S. dollar will have at least as much impact on Canada-U.S. trade as carbon pricing.

    "We think we've passed the point of no return in terms of world commitment on carbon reduction," he said, adding that what's needed now are government policies to "accelerate the transition" while keeping Canadian industries competitive.

    According to the World Bank, seven of the world's 10 largest economies have priced emissions of carbon dioxide in some fashion. China is set to bring in a cap and trade system next year, which will be the world's largest carbon market.

    Smart Prosperity chairman Stewart Elgie said the low-carbon economy transition is underway, yet the world will continue to use oil and gas, cement and minerals for decades to come.

    "Canada's niche in that low-carbon economy is to be one of the cleanest producers of those products," said Elgie.

    "The only question for Canada is: 'Are we going to keep pace with that change so we can secure our future prosperity?"'

    #2
    That's right send the bill to the taxpayers not the polluters.....then ask for government support under a green jobs initiative. ....


    Why am I not surprised the way they are playing this.

    Oh well bodes well when the farm ag groups start saying they want to be paid for their contribution to cleaning up others mess. Crickets so far.
    Last edited by bucket; Nov 24, 2016, 08:06.

    Comment


      #3
      Somebodies got to pay for the money into the pot that vulnerable "households" are expected to get cheques from.

      The real question is how this tax can reduce the use of fossil fuels in individual manufacturing, commercial and farming operations whilst not becoming uncompetitive in the global marketplace.

      As for aluminum smelter support; I suspect helps tp have an already built hydro electric dam at some place like Island Falls (if I remember correctly from 30 to 40 years ago)

      Maybe the plan should be for everyone to get busy and construct their own dams.. Strongly LOL at idiots who would be the first to stop that dumb solution.

      Comment


        #4
        The "debate" will shift from to ways to avoid payment and collect the maximum.Strike that. There isn't a debate. As was said the point of no return on this matter is long past.

        All that's left is the fallout for Canada ...and 50 cent dollars for starters.

        Comment


          #5
          Evraz has basically a dedicated power plant to melt steel....they get regular injections of cash from the government.....and a sweet deal on power....but since they are a recycler it's all good....no carbon footprint there. ...although I thought steel was carbon.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by oneoff View Post
            Somebodies got to pay for the money into the pot that vulnerable "households" are expected to get cheques from.

            The real question is how this tax can reduce the use of fossil fuels in individual manufacturing, commercial and farming operations whilst not becoming uncompetitive in the global marketplace.

            As for aluminum smelter support; I suspect helps to have an already built hydro electric dam . Now good on Alcan.and let it be cited as a rare example of foresight and putting together a most successful business and sustainable set of plans

            This from Wikipedia (The municipal town of Kitimat came into existence in the 1950s after the Provincial Government of British Columbia invited Alcan to develop hydroelectric facilities to support one of the most power-intensive of all industries — the aluminum smelting industry. The company built a dam, 16 km (10 mi) tunnel, powerhouse, 82 km (51 mi) transmission line, a deep sea terminal and smelter. The company also designed, laid out and assisted with the initial construction of the city. At the time, the combined development was considered "the most expensive project ever attempted by private industry.")

            But what chance of success would there be for anyone or any business to put together such a dam or pipeline or powerline ; let alone all of them at once and without grants and handouts

            Is it being suggested by the think tank that the plan should be for everyone to get busy and construct their own dams and all of the above.. Strongly LOL at idiots who would be the first to stop that dumb solution.
            Now the edit says the message is too short so here's another few letters#%*$##

            Comment


              #7
              The advantage of a price on carbon is it uses market signals to reduce carbon emissions. This is a free market oriented solution.

              As far as making Canadian industries more or less competitive there is usually no single factor such as energy costs that determines competitive advantage.

              We don't have a level playing field in many of these industries anyway. And if Canadian industries adopt cleaner more efficient energy use before our competitors then this may be a competitive advantage.

              Brad Wall can take the carbon revenue and pick winners and losers if he so chooses. He may well negotiate a deal on coal electrical generation to allow for more transition time. He may well rebate low income and rural residents to minimize the increased costs.

              He has already chosen carbon capture and storage which is one of the most expensive options. I think it it may have a fit but not at the cost of 1.3 billion.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by bucket View Post
                Evraz has basically a dedicated power plant to melt steel....they get regular injections of cash from the government.....and a sweet deal on power....but since they are a recycler it's all good....no carbon footprint there. ...although I thought steel was carbon.
                Mild steel is about 0.5%, so no.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Chuck2 have to be honest I have grown tired of debating with you. But I have one thing I need to say in relation to a previous post. Was just watching Global National, they were reporting on a workplace accident in China where 67 workers were killed when a scaffolding collapsed will they were working on a cooling tower of a new coal electricity generation plant. Then she stated that China continues to build 2 coal electricity plants a week. All your left leaning cut and paste articles appear to be a lot of wishful thinking, enough said!

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Reads same kind of #'s, LOTS of coal plants being built in China...tired of PRO CARBON/CO2 bullshit to! Can't wait for WARMER!

                    Comment


                      #11
                      China will hold many records.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Hard to believe they want to be leaders on carbon reduction when they can't adopt basic smog control.
                        50 yr old technology.
                        It's all about putting the people to work and a higher standard of living even if they can't breath the air.

                        Comment

                        • Reply to this Thread
                        • Return to Topic List
                        Working...