Is a canola sample with higher oil content reflected with a higher bushel weight? If it is, is this how we are compensated for higher oil? just curious
Look for years I never got paid for protein in my wheat and I am certainly not sure it made a difference in my net returns. I have always focussed on yields and grade quality. Now I have to contract a reference grade and protein level and get what the machine tells me I have.
Seems once that decision was made everyone had to buy on that parameter whether they liked it or not, I believe it was a regulatory change.
Those regions that purportedly have lower oil contents like the more southern latitudes can grow corn and soybeans and other broad acre crops that do not fit in our geography.
Seems to me that if my region can typically grow markedly higher oil content canola and that is the driver of the crush than why the product cannot be further segmented and priced accordingly.
When we had a crush plant in our region, by the way that facility and siding has now been converted to ship hydrocarbons in it's new life, I believe if my memory serves me correct we were paid an oil premium. This was some 30 years ago or so at the start of my career so those slips are long in the burn barrel.
On the wheat issue what drove the change to pay for protein. Areas that consistently grew higher protein wheats that lobbied to be paid for it?
Seems on our farm we pay a lot of levy on canola and when I have asked for an explanation on this issue from those that collect it I never get a satisfactory answer.
Is it another one of those questions that gets answered by the question of "follow the money?".
Look for years I never got paid for protein in my wheat and I am certainly not sure it made a difference in my net returns. I have always focussed on yields and grade quality. Now I have to contract a reference grade and protein level and get what the machine tells me I have.
Seems once that decision was made everyone had to buy on that parameter whether they liked it or not, I believe it was a regulatory change.
Those regions that purportedly have lower oil contents like the more southern latitudes can grow corn and soybeans and other broad acre crops that do not fit in our geography.
Seems to me that if my region can typically grow markedly higher oil content canola and that is the driver of the crush than why the product cannot be further segmented and priced accordingly.
When we had a crush plant in our region, by the way that facility and siding has now been converted to ship hydrocarbons in it's new life, I believe if my memory serves me correct we were paid an oil premium. This was some 30 years ago or so at the start of my career so those slips are long in the burn barrel.
On the wheat issue what drove the change to pay for protein. Areas that consistently grew higher protein wheats that lobbied to be paid for it?
Seems on our farm we pay a lot of levy on canola and when I have asked for an explanation on this issue from those that collect it I never get a satisfactory answer.
Is it another one of those questions that gets answered by the question of "follow the money?".
Comment