• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sask Power CCS (some details typically not reprinted)

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Well just for giggles; global warming is supposedly all about increasng temperatures.

    So grassy comes up with anecdotal evidence that only a minor temperature would cause frosts and crop disasters around the world.

    Show me any correlation that just because minor decreases (of same order as your example; or even a couple of degrees Centigrade (not Farenheit) greater; would cause global crop production reductions. It might be found that some areas would benefit from a temperature increase; farming areas might increase in total acreage; and plant growth flourish with increased CO2.

    In short; your analysis and conclusion might be well off the mark.

    Comment


      #32
      Third try - ammonia as gas, for gassy.

      DU, being in the fowl meat production business, should have few problems teaming up with a beef producer. That doesn't add anything to your being accepted with letters of support from groups promoting plant protein.

      Comment


        #33
        So DU aren't an environmental group? that's twisting it a bit far Chicken. Don't think your fellow posters would agree.

        Comment


          #34
          Still talking meat, gasfarmer. Myself included. lol

          DU is in the business of managing government water resources as water does not belong to private businesses. DU's objective is to offer landowners small incentives to keep its water fowl hunting culture well supplied. Nothing more, nothing less.

          Gas , naturally, has accepted DU's bribes because heaven forbid he can't afford to provide enough groceries for his packing plant on his own property. Bravo, way to fix your costs, but you just lost another bit of independence and control.

          The patsy sold out again, but I will agree that you are an expert in knowing moving expenses.

          Comment


            #35
            You seem only to be an expert at getting it wrong, I keep "checking" to see if you've smartened up but thus far it hasn't happened. Never taken a cent from DU nor signed any type of conservation agreement with them. Try again - or on second thoughts don't bother, it's tedious.

            Comment


              #36
              Yes, but did you get them to pay you for grazing out the portions of their land that they wanted grazing. If you didn't, then you're still a patsy.

              Comment


                #37
                No dummy, wrong again. Not a cent.

                Comment


                  #38
                  You are not a very sharp negotiator then gassy. But you don't negotiate, don't listen, you only tell.

                  Those with sheep herds that pasture graze spurge problems wouldn't sign on for simple material to fill their animal guts. There would be a charge.

                  Beekeepers wouldn't sign on to almond grove farmers problem of pollination just for the honey they would produce. There would be charge.

                  DU felt they had a problem on their land, and the patsy took it on for the grazing rights. Total dummy.

                  Comment

                  • Reply to this Thread
                  • Return to Topic List
                  Working...