• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Co-operatives

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    stone picker. i do not know where you live.
    maybe southern or western alberta , maybe you had movement.

    but we had nothing.
    i had booked sales into march, in late november.
    only because they would not book a sale earlier.
    that was only to get bags out of the field,and some cash,
    forget about the bins. the basis was horrid.

    then i had to seed around the bags, only got to haul it in october.
    bins were 80 % full going into harvest, good thing i had a bagger,

    by then we were well trained , with the backlog , that if we wanted to move a bushell
    it had to be contracted 6 months ahead, no matter how bad the terms

    i am know i am not the only one that had those problems.
    stop trying to rewrite history, that it never happened

    ask vicki dutton out of battleford, what % of their car orders of peas / lentils they got to ship.
    then tell me again, how it did not cost us anything.
    Last edited by sawfly1; Dec 28, 2016, 05:09.

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by Hopalong View Post
      See renewed interest in a farmer owned grain handler for southern Saskatchewan.
      Preliminary proposal looks to be investor owned with linkage to amount of cropland.
      Might be useful to look at co-operative entities in USA and Australia and ask why they survived while our own prairie farmer owned ones have died.
      Also to ask about other parts of the world where farmer owned and/or co-operative grain handlers have either survived or failed.
      Some of us will remember when co-operative farms were big in Communist governed countries and wonder if any of them survive.
      There was also support from Sask govt for co-ops, don't know if any of that remains.
      Hi Hopalong,

      I think you are referring to Comtrax proposal in the SE.

      I think the reference to crop land that you are referring to is to simply put farmers in a frame of mind that it is doable. For example for farmers to raise $30,000,000 look at it as $5 per acre for 5 years on 1,200,000 acres which is 200 - 250 farmers.

      In no way is the intention to run as coop. Some farms will invest more some will invest far less. We will go to non farm investors to make up the difference if we have to.

      Major objective is to be fully capitalized. Most common recipe for failure is under capitalization and debt.

      Also to clarify competetiveness, Comtrax will be fee for service public house with take or pay agreements allowing multiple experienced grain traders to operate through the facilty.

      Comtrax won't just be grain will be trans loading other commodities as well. Will have competetive advantage of 134 to 260 car spot.

      West coast in 5 years will have excess capacity and will be looking for origination.

      Comment


        #18
        Mbatrud. I was involved in a company that was a toll processor. Be careful when setting up your agreement with companies. If they don't own the facility they don't worry about the number of turns they make. If they pay by the tonne if can be a convenient collection point for periodic shipment.

        So in other words storage and handling both need a price assigned.

        I also know someone who looked at building a fertilizer storage facility. They were going to charge a larger fee for the first turn and less for subsequent turns giving incentive to maximize use, thereby lowering their average cost.

        Just ideas.

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by LEP View Post
          Mbatrud. I was involved in a company that was a toll processor. Be careful when setting up your agreement with companies. If they don't own the facility they don't worry about the number of turns they make. If they pay by the tonne if can be a convenient collection point for periodic shipment.

          So in other words storage and handling both need a price assigned.

          I also know someone who looked at building a fertilizer storage facility. They were going to charge a larger fee for the first turn and less for subsequent turns giving incentive to maximize use, thereby lowering their average cost.

          Just ideas.
          Noted. Take or pay agreement will address minimum turns.

          Comment


            #20
            Not defending or even supporting co-ops or other farmer owned entities but note that many were successful until they started putting profit to investors ahead of service at cost to members.
            Don't believe that grain handlers are making such exorbitant profits that newcomers can easily break into the business.
            Start up ones need member loyalty to succeed and think it is less likely to last than that for co-ops in past.
            Have respect for a profit driven system that encourages investors, no matter who they are or where they live, to put their money where it will bring best return.

            Comment


              #21
              Mbratrud

              Does the new facility have the ability to load containers ?


              It seems before the 2008 meltdown.... bulk freight had got expensive enough to use containers.

              Comment


                #22
                Originally posted by bucket View Post
                Mbratrud

                Does the new facility have the ability to load containers ?


                It seems before the 2008 meltdown.... bulk freight had got expensive enough to use containers.
                If this can go ahead, commercial partners would have a lot of say in the facilty. But definatly have had conversations around container loading. CP fairly protective of GTH infrastructure

                Comment


                  #23
                  Mbratrud

                  Unless you meant something else you said ....."If this can go ahead, commercial partners would have a lot of say in the facilty."


                  Can you sell this to producers when it sounds like you are building a turnkey facility for one of the commercials using producers money.


                  The more I think about this ....the right place to do this project would be at a port.....for all the smaller players looking for a throughput ....producer cars and smaller companies that don't have the resources at export....

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by bucket View Post
                    Mbratrud

                    Unless you meant something else you said ....."If this can go ahead, commercial partners would have a lot of say in the facilty."


                    Can you sell this to producers when it sounds like you are building a turnkey facility for one of the commercials using producers money.


                    The more I think about this ....the right place to do this project would be at a port.....for all the smaller players looking for a throughput ....producer cars and smaller companies that don't have the resources at export....
                    You have a point Bucket. Producer cars are becoming thing of past due to no place to unload. Right to load producer car is gone.

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Instead of kissing the industry's ass and calling it something for farmers ....why not actually do something that can bypass the commercials....thereby setting up a system that uses markets not target price orders.

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by bucket View Post
                        Instead of kissing the industry's ass and calling it something for farmers ....why not actually do something that can bypass the commercials....thereby setting up a system that uses markets not target price orders.
                        Commercial can mean a lot of things. Grain company, grain trader, Miller, crusher.. The proposed grain facilty portion of Comtrax will have input from its "customers" which will be buyers of Grains, oilseeds and Pulses. The plan is to bring New buyers to the Market place while maintaining control of the services provided to farmers. We are open to ideas. Contact me I'd be happy to discuss any ideas you have. We just want to start building farmer investment in an industry that has gotten out of touch.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Mbratrud

                          I asked about bringing a warehouse to store farmers product in a centralized location that allows bagged or bulk product to be offered to end users in another thread .....you could become the alibaba of farm products.....sort of like a giant global farmers market....

                          Peas....lentils....mustards. ...chickpeas....and other specialty crops that could be sourced from one bonded warehouse in western Canada. ....


                          But I still think.... after pondering it....the west coast port idea would service smaller players in western Canada better ....most of the product will be exported.

                          Sourcing isn't the bottleneck ....having a place to put it on ships could be...

                          And having a port position to import fertilizer will be viable after Trudeau shitcans fertilizer production in western Canada. ...I guess he would rather see flares than fertilizer plants....I digress.

                          Comment

                          • Reply to this Thread
                          • Return to Topic List
                          Working...