• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Second wind for power project

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Second wind for power project

    Second wind for power project, if it blows over well with landowners
    D.C. Fraser, Regina Leader-Post

    Published on: January 5, 2017 | Last Updated: January 5, 2017 3:23 PM CST

    A 177 megawatt wind turbine project is getting a second chance in southwest Saskatchewan, but first has to pass the test with the province and landowners in the area.

    SaskPower and Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. announced Thursday a new location for a wind farm originally planned for a site near Chaplin. Environmental concerns — it was too close to a migratory bird flight path — led to a needed change of location for the proposed 77 wind turbines.

    That new location will put the turbines in the Blue Hills area, between Herbert and Neidpath, in southwest Saskatchewan.

    Landowners in the area say they were recently approached by agents representing the Ontario-based Algonquin Power.

    Tom Donnelly, a retired farmer in the area, says it is still early in the process, but he has been approached with a lease agreement.

    “I have mixed feelings about it. I don’t particularly like the idea of obstructions on the farm land, but it is clean energy, it generates without pollution. So it’s a good idea, but kind of a nuisance,” he said. “We have some concerns, whether you’re making the right deal or not.”

    He said some neighbours are against it, some neighbours are for it and some are indifferent. As it stands now, he is hoping a meeting can happen with all those involved in the proposal.

    “It seems to be a general lack of information coming from the company there, we really don’t seem to get much information,” he said.

    Beyond securing the land to put the turbines on, Algonquin is also tasked with passing through the province’s regulatory review process.

    When Algonquin’s Chaplin site was rejected in September, the province introduced more detailed guidelines for wind turbines in the province. The document details certain areas to avoid, like national or provincial parks, certain rivers and areas with significant bird populations. It also recommends design elements to minimize effects on wildlife.

    Tim Schuster, director of independent power producer development for SaskPower, says early indications of Algonquin’s Blue Hills site are positive.

    “It seems to be a good site, but the detailed work has to be done, the studies have to be done,” he said.

    A news release from SaskPower says it is expected to be in service by 2020.

    Algonquin originally won a request-for-proposal process with SaskPower to provide wind power in 2012 at its proposed Chaplin site.

    When the Chaplin site was rejected by the province, SaskPower gave the company “an opportunity for an alternative site” according to Schuster.

    The 177 megawatts produced at the Blue Hills location, if approved, will make up about 11 per cent of the wind power SaskPower is hoping to have online by 2030.

    SaskPower is opening up a tendering process for another 200 MWs of wind power next month, as it aims to have 1,600 MWs of wind-generated power by 2030.

    dfraser@postmedia.com

    #2
    Anyone know where these things are made?

    Comment


      #3
      Sask Power and Private owned Sask.electricity production from Wikipedia

      Coal 1686 mw
      Hydro 853 mw
      Gas 1612 mw
      Wind 199 mw
      Co-Generation Waste heat 20 mw
      Bio-Mass 10mw

      Total 4380 mw

      Coal share of total 38%
      Gas Share of Total 37%
      Hydro share of total 19%

      Comment


        #4
        So if Saskpower intends to have 1600mw of wind power by 2030 then coal's share will fall to 28%or lower depending on how much more is converted to gas. By the looks of it we are not going to be very dependent on coal in the future. My bet is more natural gas conversions to allow wind to take a bigger share.

        Comment


          #5
          More gas and wind in Saskatchewan! Sounds like what we get from Agriville!!

          Comment


            #6
            Straight from the horse's mouth.

            Comment


              #7
              If they're using vesta turbines they used to be made in Denmark

              Comment


                #8
                How do you win when the conservation groups shut the Chaplin site down?


                A few birds get chewed up....and that's the criteria.....ffs.
                Last edited by bucket; Jan 9, 2017, 15:49.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Set them up on the banks of the Ottawa River....probably only take out vultures, old buzzards, stool pigeons and flying "pigs".

                  Comment

                  • Reply to this Thread
                  • Return to Topic List
                  Working...