• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper agrees to G7 'decarbonization' by 2100

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Prime Minister Stephen Harper agrees to G7 'decarbonization' by 2100

    Canada commits to G7 plan to end use of fossil fuels

    Steven Chase

    KRÜN, Germany — The Globe and Mail

    Published Monday, Jun. 08, 2015 11:01AM EDT

    Last updated Tuesday, Jun. 09, 2015 1:16AM EDT

    Canada has joined other Group of Seven leaders in pledging to stop burning fossil fuels by the end of the century, but Canadian officials are playing down the promise as an “aspirational” target and Stephen Harper says it will only be reached through advances in technology.

    In their end-of-meeting statement, G7 leaders called for an end to fossil-fuel use by the global economy by 2100 as well as cuts to greenhouse-gas emissions by 2050 that lower them as much as 70 per cent from 2010 levels.
    Canada, Japan push for slow approach to carbon reduction at G7 (BNN Video)

    The G7 statement represents a watered-down goal from what German Chancellor Angela Merkel as host of the‎ summit had sought. Ms. Merkel had been pushing for a commitment to a low-carbon economy, or relatively light use of fossil fuels, by 2050.

    A Western diplomat said European countries in the G7 went into the meeting looking for stronger language about moving to a global low-carbon economy, and it was Canada, a net exporter of energy, along with Japan, who wanted to push back the stated timelines for that ambition. In the end, one diplomat noted, the G7’s final communiqué, which calls for decarbonisation of the global economy “over the course of this century,” allows each country to put a different interpretation on whether that would happen nearer to 2050 or 2100. But the notion of decarbonisation, at least, was agreed upon.

    Lutz Weischer, the team leader for international climate policy at Germanwatch, a non-government organization that advocates sustainable development, said, ultimately, Canada didn’t want to be seen as “a one-country minority.”

    The Prime Minister’s Office denied that Canada had been trying behind the scene to soften language and commitments on fighting climate change. “There was a consensus and Canada supported that outcome,” PMO spokesman Stephen Lecce said.

    By having the G7 leaders present a united front on climate, Ms. Merkel did achieve her goal to lay the groundwork for an international agreement on climate, to be discussed in Paris in December.

    “Mindful of this goal … we emphasize that deep cuts in global greenhouse-gas emissions are required with a decarbonisation of the global economy over the course of this century,” the leaders of the U.S., U.K., Germany, France, Japan, Italy and Canada said in a communiqué.

    G7 member countries agreed to a goal of limiting the increase in global temperature to less than 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

    For Mr. Harper, a politician from petroleum-rich Alberta, the pledge comes as a surprise, since it amounts to slapping to an expiry sticker on one of Canada’s major economic drivers, including the oil sands. But these commitments impose no firm obligations on Mr. Harper’s government in the short term and he said results will be achieved through technology, not economic sacrifice.

    “I don’t think we should fool ourselves. Nobody is going to start to shutdown their industries or turn off the lights,” Mr. Harper told reporters after the G7 summit wrapped up in Germany’s Bavarian Alps. “To achieve these kinds of milestones over the decades to come will require serious technological transformation,” he said.

    A senior Canadian government official tried to allay the impression that Mr. Harper had written off the oil patch, calling the G7 statement an “aspirational target” and repeating the Prime Minister’s comments that it’s up to technology to save the day.

    In the oil sands, scores of companies have abandoned expansion projects in response to the sharp drop in commodity prices.

    But others are pushing ahead with plans to substantially boost production for decades to come, confident that new technologies will offset more stringent environmental controls, should they be imposed on the sector.

    They include Suncor Energy Inc., which is building a $13.5-billion oil sands mine it says will pump 180,000 barrels a day for 50 years, starting in 2017. Imperial Oil Ltd., a unit of U.S. oil giant Exxon Mobil Corp., plans to more than double output from an existing mine and says it could add some 4.7 billion barrels of new resource to its Alberta reserves by 2030.

    “The challenge we all face is how to reduce [greenhouse-gas] emissions while global demand for energy is increasing and we transition to lower carbon energy over the next several decades,” Tim McMillan, president and chief executive of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, said in a statement. “While it is impossible to tie technological breakthroughs to a timetable, our industry is focused on technological innovation and have already reduced our GHG emissions per barrel by about 30 per cent since 1990.”

    Mr. Harper has long resisted ambitious action on climate change His government, for instance, promised to cut carbon emissions by 17 per cent from 2005 levels by 2020. But last fall, the federal government’s commissioner of the environment warned there’s growing evidence “the target will be missed.”

    David Mc‎Laughlin, the former head of the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy, a federal environmental agency, said ‎the commitment to phase out fossil fuels is so far off it imposes no burden of responsibility on the Harper government. The Conservatives have not made sufficient investment in technological research to generate the breakthroughs that will be needed to move beyond fossil fuels, he said.

    With reports from Jeff Lewis in Calgary and Campbell Clark in Ottawa

    #2
    When did close to two year old news become new news. This is the first anyone has "heard" from citizen Harper in months upon months Few seem to be able to remember June 2015; even less want to.
    Some years from now I will drag up an even much older news report that certainly isn't embarrassing or short sighted ...but is so contrary to refusing to accept current reality that some persons still won't have the first clue what the point was.

    Now while its a waste of time arguing with some messengers.... with even a little bit of a following the masses can turn into an effective army.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by oneoff View Post
      When did close to two year old news become new news. This is the first anyone has "heard" from citizen Harper in months upon months Few seem to be able to remember June 2015; even less want to.
      Some years from now I will drag up an even much older news report that certainly isn't embarrassing or short sighted ...but is so contrary to refusing to accept current reality that some persons still won't have the first clue what the point was.

      Now while its a waste of time arguing with some messengers.... with even a little bit of a following the masses can turn into an effective army.
      Where was your outrage when Harper said the same thing essentially? 2 years ago is not very long. The electorate has a short memory. It is always about politics. This is an opportunity for Conservatives to criticize even though the previous prime minister was saying we need to phase out fossil fuels by 2100. Hypocritical is the word that comes to mind.

      Comment


        #4
        At the end of a century or 2100 so really in the next 84 years we should have something other than oil. But JT said phase out now and go green.

        Why dig up harper, Maybe we can blame this on Grant Devine also. Who knows.

        Trudeau is the Leader of Canada its his baby and he is slowly drowning the child.

        Comment


          #5
          Well the National Energy Program did happen under a Trudeau Some remember the devastation in Western Canada that resulted.

          And Harper was in power in 2015; and that type of devastation didn't happen and might not have if he was still in power in 2100.

          But JT owns what he does whilst he has the reigns. And we can count on him pressing forward with his plans Don't we all agree

          And would it be surprising if indeed it doesn't again result in devastation to Western Canada.

          No hypocrisy present...not even a Conservative vote from this writer.

          Comment


            #6
            If I understand you correctly you are defending Trudeau's desire to shut down the oilsands by quoting old comments from Harper. I thought everyone on the left despised Harper and everything he stood for? I think at some point we will discover a new superior energy source to oil, at the present there isn't one.

            Comment


              #7
              Is there any leader/country on earth yet saying screw the carbon BS, we are NOT participating in the lie?
              perhaps Trump will be first and lead to the unraveling of the whole can of worms, over paid elite/civil servants/green groups, giving themselves a reason to exist. Distracting from REAL issues/concerns.

              Comment


                #8
                The National Energy Program (NEB) occurred around the time of huge run up in international oil prices. Keeping energy costs lower for all Canadians was part of the plan as all Canadians were suffering due to the oil shock. So Alberta being the main oil producer not western Canada earned less but all Canadians saved something on energy prices. The oil industry is not the only industry in Canada btw. Consumers and all industries benefit when energy prices are lower. So you should go back to the NEB and see what life was like for average Canadians and not just Albertans. Most of you have no clue what it would be like to govern a country with all the various provinces and competing interest groups to manage. Get off your asses and find out.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Should read NEP.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    The oilrigs in Alberta were sold at auction and went to Venezuela during the NEP era.

                    This time (with carbon taxes) oil sands will be phased out, coal will be done; oil will be ridiculed and despised; but irreplaceable for base loads and we will have a whole new set of problems to deal with. Nuclear is a non starter and the sun won't shine 24 hours a day and the wind won't always blow. Nobody wants another dam; nobody wants pipelines; nobody can count on or use trains and Western Canada has a harsh climate; and either we are allowed to stay warm, be comfortable and have the standard of living that is close to be deemed necessary or we aren't going to be satisfied happy campers. Like devastating changes forced before they are ready, price increases that can't be afforded by many, division and unrest as is evident in the USA when the peasants; and protesters say enough is too much.

                    I'm willing and able and ready to give Trump a chance. He's got 4 years of getting his way and I bet he does as he has promised. The Austrailian example of rescinding their carbon scheme is proof that plans can be overturned. Those examples can and will be replicated in other countries...given the right circumstances.

                    That was a wise statement that I heard not long ago "there will be many elections before 2030"

                    Just because immigration or temporary workers or "green energy" or hydrogen powered engines are on the drawing boards doesn't mean that all the problems are solved. It just that problems created are put off into the immediate and distant future by pretending that time is needed to address them later.

                    One of the biggest oversights is that; even in Germany; industry is exempt from impacts of their radical changes. After all somebody needs to export that new technology to meet their targets.

                    But its like a pyramid scheme that works best for those first in; providing you've got a good successful marketing plan. Otherwise everyone gets burnt.


                    Sorry burnt. That definitely isn't meant to be any lind of a joke.joke

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...