• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Oh Chuck.....

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Japanese government planning to build 45 new coal fired power stations to diversify supply
    ABC Rural
    By Babs McHugh

    Updated about 11 hours ago

    The Japanese government is moving ahead with its plans to build up to 45 new coal fired power stations.

    The power plants will utilise high energy, low emissions (HELE) technology that use high-quality black coal.

    Japan is the largest overseas market for Australian coal producers, taking more than a third of all exports.

    Tom O'Sullivan, a Tokyo based energy consultant with Mathyos Global Advisory, said in the wake of the Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011, Japan started importing more liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Australia.

    But he said the move to more coal fired power was because coal was cheaper than LNG, and the energy security was priority for the government.

    "Japan needs to import 95 per cent of all its energy sources," he said.

    "So it's trying to diversify its fuel sources and it doesn't want to be too reliant on any one market."

    Japan has ratified the Paris Climate Agreement and committed to a 26 per cent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions by 2030.

    But Mr O'Sullivan said Japan was yet to price carbon emissions.

    "Although Japan spent $US36 billion dollars on commercial solar power last year, and is planning much more, there is no carbon price," he said.

    "So at this stage there is no incentive to not build coal fired power station, unlike other countries and states that can have a price as high as $US35-40 per tonne of carbon dioxide emitted."

    Mr O'Sullivan said while community and environmental groups had expressed concerns about the construction of a major coal power station, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe was firmly behind the plans.

    He said the decision would ensure the use of coal in Japan would continue well into the middle of the century.

    "These guys [private companies] are not going to go ahead and [put money into] in large capital investments unless they have a 30-year depreciation period," he said.

    "So if they're building these coal power plants now it is reasonable to expect them to be still on the books by the end of 2050."
    HELE power plants and emissions reduction

    There are a number of different types of HELE power station technologies. In Australia, the CSIRO has been working on different programs to further the use of them.

    The Minerals Council of Australia and the Federal Government are on the record saying HELE coal fired power plants produce half of the emissions of traditional plants.

    But David Harris, a CSIRO research director in the Low Emissions Technology Department, said it was not as straight forward as that.
    "The average global efficiency of existing power plants now is probably less than about less than 34 per cent," he said.

    "If we could raise that global average to around 40 per cent, that's equivalent to removing two gigatons of carbon dioxide a year.

    Comment


      #12
      The previous 2 articles give some background as to why Japan is investing in coal to replace Nuclear. As I have said before we are still going to need fossil energy sources for a long time. But renewables will become more and more of the diverse supply.

      "Although Japan spent $US36 billion dollars on commercial solar power last year, and is planning much more, there is no carbon price," he said.

      Comment


        #13
        stiffening competition compliments of the tax payer sounds familiar.

        Comment


          #14
          The horseshit above coming from the cut and paste service of someone who plans on burning all the fossil fuels that he may need "for a long time into the future"

          His words printed numerous times lately.

          So although there are staunch supporters who will lecture; they are certainly not those who lead.

          Look at the powerhousesolar.ca for Ontario Hydro Solar PV for the month of January just finished.

          A two week stretch of diffuse sunlight producing a fraction of a few measly Kwh from a bit of diffuse sunlight for a very limited number of hours. Just the example Western Canada should follow?
          In case some haven't noticed; a certain Mr Trump praised good clean Kentucky coal and vowed to get those miners back on the job. And for those who are intent on making their economies uncompetitive and running on uncontrolled debt....does anyone think this economic plan will turn out well?????

          I'm going back to sleep and quit wasting time on nonsense.

          Comment


            #15
            What is wrong with cutting and pasting relevant articles? If you don't want to read them don't.

            Before you make any decision do you rely on only what you know or do you do some research and get some analysis from other sources that have some expertise or opinions?

            We have heard you argument about solar production in winter. This is not news.

            What about wind? What is your analysis on the proposed Sask Power 1600 Mw of wind?

            Comment


              #16
              Where is your leadership on coal? Are you using coal to heat your numerous houses and shops, dry your grain, power your farm machinery? If coal is so wonderful and cheap why are you not building a small scale coal burning generating station?

              Comment


                #17
                Coal plants run 24/7 rain or shine. ..with or without wind.....sun or no sun....pretty important for a industrialized country.

                Even more important for a exporting nation like Canada. ...


                It's really too bad that fukashima didn't have a small wave for them to make improvements to factor in a 1 in 1000 year tsunami.


                Not sure if engineers factor for that....

                Just a random thing that occurred that isn't textbook....until it happens.


                Nuclear should be safe on the Canadian shield one would think....they mine it there. ...they could refine it and have it making power as well....


                But you never can tell if something might go wrong up there as well....so coal is probably the best pick...near the coal mine....

                Comment


                  #18
                  small individually operated coal fired power supply is unsustainable as large solar or wind power is unsustainable or economically viable. now reverse this scenario and voila.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Binthere, If wind is not viable why is Saskpower proposing 1600 Mw of wind capacity?

                    Comment


                      #20
                      I realize small scale coal generating is not feasible, but space heating with coal is still in use on farms.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...