Global warming and manufactured doubt Debate in peer-reviewed science about human-ind

[chuckChuck]

LEP that is good advice for you and everyone else on this site. It pretty much goes without saying.

Do you believe the peer reviewed science on global warming?

How did we get to this level of technological advancement without relying on experts who's life, education, and research is devoted to understanding very specific fields?

Would you let a farmer decide what are the long term trends in global climate change and what is causing climate change? Would you let a farmer calculate the rocket science math to get to the moon? Would you let a farmer design a jet air craft?

[stonepicker]

Most scientists once thought the earth was flat, most scientists once thought the sun and planets revolved around the earth. Troll.

[chuckChuck]

So don't trust anything from science? How can you farm with fertilizers and pesticides? They are products of science! Stop using them because as far as Stonepicker is concerned the earth is still flat!

[LEP]

Chucky what is your position on vaccines ? Gmos?

I find it interesting that the precious generation believes whole heartedly in climate science but is suspect of vaccines and gmos, Nuclear power and other peer reviewed scientificically supported developments.

[fjlip]

ChCh, just talking/pasting to hear yourself ROAR? None here will be converted ,so talk to the walls, just as effective.

[chuckChuck]

Vaccines are good. GMOs are probably safe but have primarily been used to make sure farmers are tied to using expensive seed and totally dependent on glyphosate.

[Stampsguy]

Daniel Smith just interviewed on Calgary radio a scientist who said their is NO consensus in the scientific community on global warming and yet the fear mongers say their is something like 94% and they keep on repeating it over and over, figuring if they keep on repeating the lie enough then people will eventually believe it.

Listen to Dr Tim Ball if you have an open mind and you may learn what a big scam this all is. He says CO2 only makes up 4% of the green house gases and he can't figure out why they are going after CO2 as the main culprit.

Also, another recently interviewed scientist puts it all in perspective when he says that their is 88000 molecules in a certain volume of atmosphere. Of that, 33 are CO2 and of that 33 only 1.5 to 2 are man made the remainder come from mother nature.

And how about the scientists that have been caught altering data just to profit from this whole climate change scam.

[workboots]

In his spare time, Stonepicker rolls his own cigarettes. Takes good long pulls into his COPD/cancer filled lungs. All the while muttering to himself about that silly doctor that keeps telling him smoking is bad for him

"he's just a stupid troll and so are all the rest of the anti smokers too, hack! Hack!"

his go to argument that seems to be all he has for an sad argument

"because my father smoked and so did his before that..HAcK!! HAcK!"

I think Climate change deniers are really the offspring of the smoking kills deniers.

[fjlip]

Stamps guy....ChCh will call it all FAKE NEWS, but who makes money on NO climate change, nothing to see here just move on , keep living s you were, that beats the CLIMATE change FEAR!

[chuckChuck]

https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php

Check out the link above as it compares the myths and lies being spread about climate science with what the actual science says.

stampguy you have been taken in by sources from manufactured doubt.